Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Mr Gray]

Competence will only be proved once Wolters reveals how the two came together for his suspect to have done for Madeleine,previous reports had him admitting no forensics,no body,one hell of a tea leave reader.

Gilroy...no body...no forensics...no proof of death...guilty

[barrier]

Gilroy...no body...no forensics...no proof of death...guilty

Thats not CB or Germany is it? did police go on tv proclaiming what they had before any trial?

[Mr Gray]

Thats not CB or Germany is it? did police go on tv proclaiming what they had before any trial?

quite simply...you dont need a body or forensics for a guilty verdict as you seem to think

[kizzy]

Dont misrepresent what I have said...HCW made it clear he was talking about the end of the year....the rest of your post is just sceptic specualtion. Sceptics are so convinced of the McCanns guilt they cannot accept that CB even may be involved. as another poster posted...

The sceptic tank installed in 2007 is now overflowing with effluent and needs a good clearout and cleansing to bring it up to date with current investigations by a competent German police force.

Ridicule as much as you like if all else fails turn to insults lol, that's what usually happens imo.

You havent a clue what HCW will come up with ...in which clue is all he has it seems.

Whereas a book was written with factual evidence gathered from the investigation way back in 2008.

Although the mccs pulled out all the stops to have it banned they failed.

Everything else since has come to nothing.

ImO either CWH is trying to buy more time with the end of the year bit ...or you are imo.

[barrier]

quite simply...you dont need a body or forensics for a guilty verdict as you seem to think

How many in Germany have been brought to court with out?

In recent times according to wiki,the grand total of one.

[Brietta]

The sceptic tank installed in 2007 is now overflowing with effluent and needs a good clearout and cleansing to bring it up to date with current investigations by a competent German police force.

I'm so envious I didn't think of that one, Myster, you've summed it up in one sentence.

We don't yet know what the Germans have on Brueckner but I don't think we are going to have to wait for much longer until we find out.
But even without it there is already enough proven fact in the public domain to spend a lot of time thinking about what he is capable of and what he may be capable of and the danger he represents to women of all ages and to innocent children.

Yet we are being asked to make comparison between this creature and the parents of a missing child.  Such a comparison really does represent a cess pit in my opinion and I think I like your description so much because it conjures up the mental image I get when I read some of the ordure put about to get the boot into people who must really be in bits at the moment.

Imagine how anyone would feel if their missing child was mentioned in the same breath as Brueckner.

[kizzy]

I'm so envious I didn't think of that one, Myster, you've summed it up in one sentence.

We don't yet know what the Germans have on Brueckner but I don't think we are going to have to wait for much longer until we find out.
But even without it there is already enough proven fact in the public domain to spend a lot of time thinking about what he is capable of and what he may be capable of and the danger he represents to women of all ages and to innocent children.

Yet we are being asked to make comparison between this creature and the parents of a missing child.  Such a comparison really does represent a cess pit in my opinion and I think I like your description so much because it conjures up the mental image I get when I read some of the ordure put about to get the boot into people who must really be in bits at the moment.

Imagine how anyone would feel if their missing child was mentioned in the same breath as Brueckner.

We don't yet know what the Germans have on Brueckner but I don't think we are going to have to wait for much longer until we find out.
But even without it there is already enough proven fact in the public domain to spend a lot of time thinking about what he is capable of and what he may be capable of and the danger he represents to women of all ages and to innocent children.


Its not about what he has done or how vile he is.

Its about was he the so called abductor of Maddie........nothing else IMO

[barrier]

How many in Germany have been brought to court with out?

In recent times according to wiki,the grand total of one.

[faithlilly]

Gilroy...no body...no forensics...no proof of death...guilty

The dogs alerted. That’s what did it.

[Mr Gray]

So you have confirmed it's possible...and Wolters has said as much

[barrier]

So you have confirmed it's possible...and Wolters has said as much

See my post in off topic.

[Brietta]

We don't yet know what the Germans have on Brueckner but I don't think we are going to have to wait for much longer until we find out.
But even without it there is already enough proven fact in the public domain to spend a lot of time thinking about what he is capable of and what he may be capable of and the danger he represents to women of all ages and to innocent children.


Its not about what he has done or how vile he is.

Its about was he the so called abductor of Maddie........nothing else IMO

We are discussing Brueckner in the context you chose to discuss him in - Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

So I am afraid it is about what he is capable of based on information about what he has done.

It is about how vile (your word) he is.

There is absolutely no comparison between two distraught parents who have performed superhumanly in their efforts and a "vile" person like Brueckner.

But you chose to make the comparison.  I wonder what prompted you to do that.

[kizzy]

We are discussing Brueckner in the context you chose to discuss him in - Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

So I am afraid it is about what he is capable of based on information about what he has done.

It is about how vile (your word) he is.

There is absolutely no comparison between two distraught parents who have performed superhumanly in their efforts and a "vile" person like Brueckner.

But you chose to make the comparison.  I wonder what prompted you to do that.

whatever crimes he has commited has nothing to do with the so-called abduction of maddie.

Wasn't there 600 IIRC on a list more than probable equally as vile as CB.

All there seems to me in this case of CB is a prosecutor trying to make a name for himself ...a chancer.

What CB has done all though repulsive there are a lot of them around some even worse than him probably.

But seems he was the nearest one with to try and fit the crime with the phone pink...that has come to nothing in nearly five months.

I will pass on the distraught parents bit.

Vile........ has surrondeed this case from day one imo.

[Brietta]

whatever crimes he has commited has nothing to do with the so-called abduction of maddie.

Wasn't there 600 IIRC on a list more than probable equally as vile as CB.

All there seems to me in this case of CB is a prosecutor trying to make a name for himself ...a chancer.

What CB has done all though repulsive there are a lot of them around some even worse than him probably.

But seems he was the nearest one with to try and fit the crime with the phone pink...that has come to nothing in nearly five months.

I will pass on the distraught parents bit.

Vile........ has surrondeed this case from day one imo.

It is a bit chilling that in a small resort town specifically advertised to unsuspecting families as being "child friendly" you think there may have been six hundred paedophiles "probably as vile as Brueckner" wandering around.

But the thread which you started - Is there more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB - just doesn't take the presence of that number of perverts into consideration.

You are defending Brueckner's human rights while for thirteen+ years denying the McCanns theirs by making comparison with innocent parents and a rapist and paedophile which is what Brueckner is.

What is your justification for doing that?   Why would anyone think it appropriate to do that?

[Eleanor]

I remember in the beginning when someone said that there were loads of Paedophiles wandering around Praia da Luz.
I thought that this was really funny and decidedly not possible.  It now seems that it could have been correct.

Who will ever know?