Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300258 times)

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1830 on: October 23, 2020, 01:56:39 PM »
That is, in my opinion, a ludicrous statement.
I agree...I think the evidence from CBs friends is far more reliable

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1831 on: October 23, 2020, 01:58:52 PM »
Afaiaa Smith and his wife have been supportive of the McCanns so he cannot still believe he saw Gerry carrying Maddie

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1832 on: October 23, 2020, 02:28:36 PM »
That is, in my opinion, a ludicrous statement.
Perhaps you could explain why Martin Smith's recall of a fleeting glimpse of a stranger passing him in the street weeks earlier, should be any more reliable than the anecdotal evidence of people who were close to CB?  I look forward to your rationale.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1833 on: October 23, 2020, 03:20:45 PM »
Perhaps you could explain why Martin Smith's recall of a fleeting glimpse of a stranger passing him in the street weeks earlier, should be any more reliable than the anecdotal evidence of people who were close to CB?  I look forward to your rationale.

Perhaps you could explain why Martin Smith's recall of a fleeting glimpse of a stranger passing him in the street

Seems the e-fit was a very good likeness IMO

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article2371953.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/E-fit.jpg

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1834 on: October 23, 2020, 03:33:27 PM »
Perhaps you could explain why Martin Smith's recall of a fleeting glimpse of a stranger passing him in the street

Seems the e-fit was a very good likeness IMO

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article2371953.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/E-fit.jpg
You do realise that the e-fits were created well after Gerry McCann had become world famous don't you?  And that if Mr Smith was absolutely certain he'd seen Gerry he could have just told the e-fit artist to copy a picture of Gerry's face?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Myster

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1835 on: October 23, 2020, 04:03:20 PM »
Perhaps you could explain why Martin Smith's recall of a fleeting glimpse of a stranger passing him in the street

Seems the e-fit was a very good likeness IMO

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article2371953.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/E-fit.jpg
Looks more like Desperate Sceptic Dan to me...
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1836 on: October 23, 2020, 04:05:20 PM »
Perhaps you could explain why Martin Smith's recall of a fleeting glimpse of a stranger passing him in the street

Seems the e-fit was a very good likeness IMO

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article2371953.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/E-fit.jpg
I thought Mr Smith didn’t have his glasses on (?)

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1837 on: October 23, 2020, 04:12:53 PM »
You do realise that the e-fits were created well after Gerry McCann had become world famous don't you?  And that if Mr Smith was absolutely certain he'd seen Gerry he could have just told the e-fit artist to copy a picture of Gerry's face?

Don't you think the police would have been aware of that when they showed it on crime watch years later?

Yet still showed it as a possible suspect.

Seems it definitely wasn't CB that he saw...at least you admit it does look like gmcc to compare it to a picture of gmcs face..

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1838 on: October 23, 2020, 04:24:14 PM »
I thought Mr Smith didn’t have his glasses on (?)

Oh right why do you think that

Could be the reason he was only 60/80% sure rather than 100% imo

He obviously could see to describe the colour of clothing.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1839 on: October 23, 2020, 04:34:21 PM »
Carrying a child with a description "very close to that of Madeleine McCann" Redwood 2013,very fleeting in deed.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1840 on: October 23, 2020, 04:42:22 PM »
Perhaps you could explain why Martin Smith's recall of a fleeting glimpse of a stranger passing him in the street

Seems the e-fit was a very good likeness IMO

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article2371953.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/E-fit.jpg

Of Paulo Cristovao.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1841 on: October 23, 2020, 04:56:57 PM »
Don't you think the police would have been aware of that when they showed it on crime watch years later?

Yet still showed it as a possible suspect.

Seems it definitely wasn't CB that he saw...at least you admit it does look like gmcc to compare it to a picture of gmcs face..
No I didn't, that's in your imagination.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1842 on: October 23, 2020, 05:08:29 PM »
No I didn't, that's in your imagination.

You do realise that the e-fits were created well after Gerry McCann had become world famous don't you?  And that if Mr Smith was absolutely certain he'd seen Gerry he could have just told the e-fit artist to copy a picture of Gerry's face?

Your post, not my imagination.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1843 on: October 23, 2020, 05:27:04 PM »


Not once have SY said

a) That there's no evidence against the McCanns

& b) That they didn't do it.

Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1844 on: October 23, 2020, 05:59:49 PM »
You do realise that the e-fits were created well after Gerry McCann had become world famous don't you?  And that if Mr Smith was absolutely certain he'd seen Gerry he could have just told the e-fit artist to copy a picture of Gerry's face?

Your post, not my imagination.
I know what I wrote.  Where do I admit anything at all?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".