« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 152 153 [154] 155 156 ... 224   Go Down

Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300604 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2295 on: October 30, 2020, 10:11:55 PM »
Quote from: G-Unit on October 30, 2020, 10:09:06 PM
The Porto team, you mean? That was in 2013 and in 2017 do Carmo said he didn't know what happened to Madeleine, so I wouldn't get too excited if I were you.

PDC said no evidence..no suspect s..but don't get too upset
Logged

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2296 on: October 30, 2020, 10:32:20 PM »
Quote from: Miss Taken Identity on October 30, 2020, 09:27:45 PM
whereas the investigation into parental involvement was...? never investigated properly due to media blocking and shifting timelines and refusal to take part in a reconstruction.

Just because they were never charged due to lack of physical evidence/and eye witness- does no mean they have no case to answer
It is a falsehood that they refused to take part in a reconstruction ... why on earth did you post it  - you must know it is not true?
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2297 on: October 30, 2020, 10:41:33 PM »
Quote from: G-Unit on October 30, 2020, 10:09:06 PM
The Porto team, you mean? That was in 2013 and in 2017 do Carmo said he didn't know what happened to Madeleine, so I wouldn't get too excited if I were you.
What makes you think I’m excited?  That is certainly not the appropriate word.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2298 on: October 31, 2020, 12:58:49 AM »
Quote from: Brietta on October 30, 2020, 10:32:20 PM
It is a falsehood that they refused to take part in a reconstruction ... why on earth did you post it  - you must know it is not true?

Oh come, come now....while technically that’s true the situation was a little more nuanced. lMO, the parents used their friends refusal to participate to scupper the reconstition.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2020, 11:32:14 PM by Angelo222 »
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2299 on: October 31, 2020, 07:13:06 AM »
^^^ still spreading propaganda 13 years later^^^
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2300 on: October 31, 2020, 08:12:59 AM »
Quote from: faithlilly on October 31, 2020, 12:58:49 AM
Oh come, come now....while technically that’s true the situation was a little more nuanced. lMO, the parents used their friends refusal to participate to scupper the reconstition.
Can't beat s bit of opinion based as fact to spread disinformation.....when the truth isn't good enough...make something up seems to be some posters MO
« Last Edit: October 31, 2020, 11:32:57 PM by Angelo222 »
Logged

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2301 on: October 31, 2020, 08:42:48 AM »
Quote from: Davel on October 31, 2020, 08:12:59 AM
Can't beat s bit of opinion based as fact to spread disinformation.....when the truth isn't good enough...make something up seems to be some posters MO

Like Madeleine was abducted you mean.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2302 on: October 31, 2020, 08:44:55 AM »
Quote from: Eleanor on October 29, 2020, 10:32:25 PM
If only they had been just useless.  Criminally Negligent more like.

Best get comfy, its like the Mousetrap its going to run,and run,and run.......
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2303 on: October 31, 2020, 08:55:11 AM »
Quote from: barrier on October 31, 2020, 08:42:48 AM
Like Madeleine was abducted you mean.
I think it's highly probable there is now proof or at least concrete evidence of abduction
Logged

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2304 on: October 31, 2020, 08:59:35 AM »
Quote from: Davel on October 31, 2020, 08:55:11 AM
I think it's highly probable there is now proof or at least concrete evidence of abduction
Nope,opinion of doesn't constitute evidence or proof of.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2305 on: October 31, 2020, 09:31:35 AM »
Quote from: barrier on October 31, 2020, 08:59:35 AM
Nope,opinion of doesn't constitute evidence or proof of.

Im not talking about opinion im talking about physical evidence
Logged

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2306 on: October 31, 2020, 10:00:50 AM »
Quote from: barrier on October 31, 2020, 08:42:48 AM
Like Madeleine was abducted you mean.

What is the evidence that Madeleine wasn't abducted?
Logged

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2307 on: October 31, 2020, 10:04:31 AM »
Quote from: Lace on October 31, 2020, 10:00:50 AM
What is the evidence that Madeleine wasn't abducted?

Martin Smith.

Kate's prints on the window.

Shifty parents.

Logged
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2308 on: October 31, 2020, 10:14:30 AM »
Quote from: Davel on October 31, 2020, 09:31:35 AM
Im not talking about opinion im talking about physical evidence

It's your opinion that physical evidence exists.
Logged
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2309 on: October 31, 2020, 11:16:09 AM »
Quote from: G-Unit on October 31, 2020, 10:14:30 AM
It's your opinion that physical evidence exists.

Based on what HCW has said in several interviews... including his statement re material evidence
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 152 153 [154] 155 156 ... 224   Go Up
« previous next »