If The Germans Have It Almost In The Bag...

[Vertigo Swirl]

No, but the absence of the transcripts could suggest he destroyed them.

Yes, that sounds like logic that might be applied to Brueckner so I'm going with that.

It certainly does sound like Spamlogic. 

[Mr Gray]

I think we all have to wait and see what the German ev is

[Wonderfulspam]

As far as I’m concerned Bruckner demonstrates a callous disregard for the well being of little children and sees them as objects to be consumed to satiate a hunger and discarded when finished with, much like fast food in fact.

Brueckner is a paedophile, yes, we get that.

Now, what evidence is there he abducted raped & murdered Maddie, other than a second hand confession & some alleged concrete?

[Wonderfulspam]

I think we all have to wait and see what the German ev is

No, I think it's better we accept unsubstantiated claims of concrete evidence as certainty of guilt myself.

I think Wolters sets an example that should be rolled out across justice systems worldwide.

If you're guilty of crime A, you are therefore guilty of crimes B through to Z.

It sounds harsh but it would reduce crime eventually, once everyone is banged up on suspicion of crimes they might never have committed.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Brueckner is a paedophile, yes, we get that.

Now, what evidence is there he abducted raped & murdered Maddie, other than a second hand confession & some alleged concrete?

You keep asking, it’s explained to you, you mock the explanation so not playing that game again.

Out of interest do you think Brückner despite talking about abducting, raping and murdering childten with a friend is really not the sort of person to actually commit such crimes?  If not why not?

[Vertigo Swirl]

No, I think it's better we accept unsubstantiated claims of concrete evidence as certainty of guilt myself.

I think Wolters sets an example that should be rolled out across justice systems worldwide.

If you're guilty of crime A, you are therefore guilty of crimes B through to Z.

It sounds harsh but it would reduce crime eventually, once everyone is banged up on suspicion of crimes they might never have committed.

Please try not to be too silly.

[Wonderfulspam]

You keep asking, it’s explained to you, you mock the explanation so not playing that game again.

Out of interest do you think Brückner despite talking about abducting, raping and murdering childten with a friend is really not the sort of person to actually commit such crimes?  If not why not?

Maybe he would commit those crimes.
But there isn't any evidence that he has.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Maybe he would commit those crimes.
But there isn't any evidence that he has.

Is it usual for the police to update you on all the evidence they have against a suspect prior to charges being brought?

[Wonderfulspam]

Is it usual for the police to update you on all the evidence they have against a suspect prior to charges being brought?

What is he being charged with?

[jassi]

What is he being charged with?

Whatever they think they can get away with - hence the late script re-write.

IMO

[Vertigo Swirl]

What is he being charged with?

I didn't say he was being charged I said is it usual for the police to contact you to divulge what evidence they have against a suspect prior to charges being brought?  Can you please tell us, as apparently you already know HCW has nothing at all.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Whatever they think they can get away with - hence the late script re-write.

IMO

Infamy, Infamy, they've all got it in fer Chrissy!  Because of course the German state just wants to frame this man for no good reason coz they just don't like him. 

[Uncle Jr]

I think there's more to merely 'collecting additional evidence' at work here with HCW.
He clearly thinks he has some compelling circumstantial evidence, but yet he waits.

Two issues spring to mind - what was the term of his latest conviction, 7 years? In Germany it's likely he'll do a third of that, due to their stance on rehabilitation. He's done at least a year, maybe more. I'm not saying he'll be released, just that his eligibility for parole is a milestone that's pending.
Then there's the issue of a fair trial, i.e. he won't get one. There must be high level machinations going on trying to square the circle HCW has created with his continued, public proclamations of CB's guilt.
I'm not legal expert (...cue the Stewart Lee bit about the Loch Ness monster "I don't know anything about zoology, biology, geology, geography, marine biology, cryptozoology, evolutionary theory, evolutionary biology, meteorology, limnology, history, herpetology, palaeontology or archaeology but I think; what if a dinosaur had got in the lake").....but I don't think it's possible for him to get a fair trial. A trial will never happen.

[jassi]

I think there's more to merely 'collecting additional evidence' at work here with HCW.
He clearly thinks he has some compelling circumstantial evidence, but yet he waits.

Two issues spring to mind - what was the term of his latest conviction, 7 years? In Germany it's likely he'll do a third of that, due to their stance on rehabilitation. He's done at least a year, maybe more. I'm not saying he'll be released, just that his eligibility for parole is a milestone that's pending.
Then there's the issue of a fair trial, i.e. he won't get one. There must be high level machinations going on trying to square the circle HCW has created with his continued, public proclamations of CB's guilt.
I'm not legal expert (...cue the Stewart Lee bit about the Loch Ness monster "I don't know anything about zoology, biology, geology, geography, marine biology, cryptozoology, evolutionary theory, evolutionary biology, meteorology, limnology, history, herpetology, palaeontology or archaeology but I think; what if a dinosaur had got in the lake").....but I don't think it's possible for him to get a fair trial. A trial will never happen.

A death in prison might.

Certainly would solve the problem, even if  he isn't involved.

Police could declare that they are not looking for anyone else and everyone can pack up and go home.

"It's justice Jim, but not as we know it"

[Wonderfulspam]

I didn't say he was being charged I said is it usual for the police to contact you to divulge what evidence they have against a suspect prior to charges being brought?  Can you please tell us, as apparently you already know HCW has nothing at all.

The burden of proof is on Wolters.
Not me.