An Inept Investigation?

[G-Unit]

It eas set up to investigate Madeleines abduction after thr scoping exercise showed this was the most likely scenario..  In investigating the abduction it could have discovered an abduction didn't happen.... That doesn't seem to have happened

There was no action in response to Gamble's report. It was the intervention of Rebecah Brooks which triggered the setting up of Operation Grange.

[Mr Gray]

There was no action in response to Gamble's report. It was the intervention of Rebecah Brooks which triggered the setting up of Operation Grange.

There was a scoping exercise before the remit was written.
All the evidence from the first investigation could be looked at.
If you want to think SY did not look at the evidence against the family.. That's up to you.  I think it's a barmy idea

You should be more concerned thst the initial investigation did not investigate CB

[G-Unit]

There was a scoping exercise before the remit was written.
All the evidence from the first investigation could be looked at.
If you want to think SY did not look at the evidence against the family.. That's up to you.  I think it's a barmy idea

You should be more concerned thst the initial investigation did not investigate CB

It's unthinkable that an inquiry was set up without a full and free investigation into the evidence previously collected, but there is reason to believe it happened.

I can think of no reason why the initial investigation should have investigated CB. His so-called friends saw no reason to inform on him at the time.

[Mr Gray]

It's unthinkable that an inquiry was set up without a full and free investigation into the evidence previously collected, but there is reason to believe it happened.

I can think of no reason why the initial investigation should have investigated CB. His so-called friends saw no reason to inform on him at the time.

Sy stated they looked at all the evidence against the mccanns.  I dint see there has been any restriction on SY it's just there's no evidence against the mccanns.  It's a Portuguese investigation.. Are the Portuguese restricted.. No.

In a recent interview amaral said the y knocked on CBs door but he wasn't in.. so they did have reason but failed to investigate him

[Mr Gray]

It's unthinkable that an inquiry was set up without a full and free investigation into the evidence previously collected, but there is reason to believe it happened.

I can think of no reason why the initial investigation should have investigated CB. His so-called friends saw no reason to inform on him at the time.

You should think again..



In the «Bild» interview, Amaral followed twice. Brückner’s name was on a list of well-known pedophiles in the region around Praia de Luz shortly after Maddie disappeared. “There was a knock on his door, but he wasn’t home,” he explains. Amaral does not believe that the German broke into the McCanns’ vacation home

[Snowgirl]

 

I think you really should be asking why the Policia Judiciaria did not use the phone evidence which was available to them in 2007.

You really do not know what evidence the German investigation holds for the simple reason that they aren't telling you and rightly so - Madeleine's is a case which is under active investigation.

I' m not asking that which you advise I should because although evidence shows the phone was used  ,  not by whom .
 Lots of instances I see  a phone  being used , e.g. " can I borrow your phone for a minute I've left mine in the car ? " when it's not the owner using  it

[Mr Gray]

*&^^&I' m not asking that which you advise I should because although evidence shows the phone was used  ,  not by whom .
 Lots of instances I see  a phone  being used , e.g. " can I borrow your phone for a minute I've left mine in the car ? " when it's not the owner using  it

You are absolutely right... Simple explanation.. CB could stop all this speculation and clear his name in an instant..... But he's not doing that is he

[Snowgirl]

You are absolutely right... Simple explanation.. CB could stop all this speculation and clear his name in an instant..... But he's not doing that is he

Perhaps  Wolters hasn't instigated questioning  him  on that point yet ?

[jassi]

Perhaps  Wolters hasn't instigated questioning  him  on that point yet ?

Apparently not.
Why answer questions that haven't been asked. Healy didn't  answer questions, even when asked. 

[Mr Gray]

Perhaps  Wolters hasn't instigated questioning  him  on that point yet ?

Hes already said he won't answer any questions... So not much point at the moment

[barrier]

Hes already said he won't answer any questions... So not much point at the moment

The press said he said.

[Vertigo Swirl]

*&^^&I' m not asking that which you advise I should because although evidence shows the phone was used  ,  not by whom .
 Lots of instances I see  a phone  being used , e.g. " can I borrow your phone for a minute I've left mine in the car ? " when it's not the owner using  it

If someone asked to borrow his phone to make a 30 minute phonecall from the vicinity of the OC then it's unlikely they went to visit CB at his home to ask him and then drove into town to make the call.  He would have been nearby also.  IMO.

[jassi]

*&^^&I' m not asking that which you advise I should because although evidence shows the phone was used  ,  not by whom .
 Lots of instances I see  a phone  being used , e.g. " can I borrow your phone for a minute I've left mine in the car ? " when it's not the owner using  it

I don't think that argument stands up, as the phone in question received the 30 minute call.

However, I suppose that the phone could have been previously stolen.

[Eleanor]

I have been wondering if there was any point in me commenting.  But obviously not.

In so far as I am concerned then the McCann [ censored word ]s can have it.  It proves nothing.

I don't know about The Paedohile, Rapist, but I suspect that there is much more to this than first appears.  He could well have been open to blackmail from certain persons.

I know who did this.  They just thought that it would never see the light of day.

[Snowgirl]

If someone asked to borrow his phone to make a 30 minute phonecall from the vicinity of the OC then it's unlikely they went to visit CB at his home to ask him and then drove into town to make the call.  He would have been nearby also.  IMO.

Not impossible though? Lending a phone isn't an offence ?