An Inept Investigation?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not impossible though? Lending a phone isn't an offence ?

The Loch Ness Monster isn't impossible, however it's also not very likely.  Same with what you're suggesting IMO.  It's implausible and illogical.  IMO.

[Mr Gray]

The press said he said.

I think his lawyer said

[Snowgirl]

The Loch Ness Monster isn't impossible, however it's also not very likely.  Same with what you're suggesting IMO.  It's implausible and illogical.  IMO.

No problem with you having your opinion if you allow me to have mine  however implausible you find it . 😊

[jassi]

Oes anyone know how long phone records were kept for back in 2007 ?

google gives a variety of answers

[Vertigo Swirl]

No problem with you having your opinion if you allow me to have mine  however implausible you find it . 😊

I’m not standing in your way of having an opinion. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Oes anyone know how long phone records were kept for back in 2007 ?

google gives a variety of answers

Long enough for them to be of use to the Germans in this case it would seem.

[barrier]

Long enough for them to be of use to the Germans in this case it would seem.

Yet we're led to believe OG forensically examined all the evidence , but never made a link, or there isn't one.

[jassi]

Presumably these are from records collected on a specific date in 2007, so they can't go back and see  other calls that were made by the phones prior to this, or perhaps even since. IE they collected  only calls made from PDL area on the 3rd May.

Would that be right ?

[Eleanor]

Not impossible though? Lending a phone isn't an offence ?

No.  The phone wasn't borrowed.  The call was made by someone else.  Who answered the phone is the question.

Have none of you actually got this yet.  How stupid are you?

We don't know who made The Call or even who answered it, but it is hardly rocket science.

You can all dream up whatever you like but Breuckner answered that phone call.  So he was where they thought he was.

But what that has got to do with anything is neither here nor there.  It proves nothing.

[barrier]

No.  The phone wasn't borrowed.  The call was made by someone else.  Who answered the phone is the question.

Have none of you actually got this yet.  How stupid are you?

We don't know who made The Call or even who answered it, but it is hardly rocket science.

You can all dream up whatever you like but Breuckner answered that phone call.  So he was where they thought he was.

But what that has got to do with anything is neither here nor there.  It proves nothing.

Nope, CB might not have answered, even if he did, could have been a date, all manner of things, like you say it proves nowt.

[jassi]

I wonder if that was the only activity on his phone that night? Not that it really matters, but it might help to identify where it was at say 10.30 that evening.

[G-Unit]

Presumably these are from records collected on a specific date in 2007, so they can't go back and see  other calls that were made by the phones prior to this, or perhaps even since. IE they collected  only calls made from PDL area on the 3rd May.

Would that be right ?

Just three days of records were collected, from the masts covering a certain location;

The telephone operators TMN, Vodaphone and Optimus be asked for the preservation and conservation in digital format (CD or DVD) of all the information relating to MOBILE PHONE TRAFFIC, including roaming calls, with an indication of the mobile phone numbers, date and time of the telephone conversations that took place on 2, 3 and 4th May 2007 with respect to the mobile phones that cover the following geographical locations:

Apartment:

N - 37,088863 // N37º 5' 19,91"
W - 8,730775...// W 8º 43' 50,79"

Tapas Restaurant

N - 37,088378 // N37º 5' 18,16"
W - 8,730979...// W 8º 43' 51,52"

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MOBILE_PHONE_ANALYSIS.htm

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yet we're led to believe OG forensically examined all the evidence , but never made a link, or there isn't one.

Why would Operation Grange have known about Brückner or his phone number when they were assessing the phone data?

[jassi]

How was this phoned identified as belonging to Brueckner ?
Was he foolish enough to use a phone registered in his name ?

Whatever, the release of the two numbers doesn't seem to have achieved anything, other than media publicity about Brueckner, which perhaps was really the purpose.

[Eleanor]

Ah well you see, no one knew of this in those days.  No one knew that they could be pin pointed.

But Breckner's phone was there in Praia da Luz.  You may make what you like of that.