Maddie Basta de Mentiras

[Brietta]

INTERVIEW
Gonçalo Amaral. The "fear" of Portuguese justice and the "lies" of German justice in the Maddie case
Oct 14, 2021 - 16:54 • Celso Paiva Sol

On the day his new book "Maddie - Enough Lies" hits the retail market, the former PJ inspector, who led the first few months of research, says what he thinks of the German investigation and goes back to saying that the parents of the English child still have much to explain about that day May 3, 2007.

Gonçalo Amaral accuses the public prosecutor and the Judicial Police of being afraid to investigate the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Of witnessing an unforgivable breach of a violation of national sovereignty, apparently, for fear of reaching politically incorrect conclusions.

On the day his new book "Maddie - Enough Lies" hits the retail market, the former PJ inspector, who led the first few months of research, says what he thinks of the German investigation and goes back to saying that the parents of the English child still have much to explain about that day May 3, 2007.

We started this conversation with the challenge to answer the question you put on the cover of the book. 14 years later, why don't we know the truth?

For fear of the police and the Portuguese prosecutors, I have no doubt about it.

Afraid of what?

Fear of an investigation that is not politically correct. The Portuguese judicial authorities seem to prefer others to resolve the matter, and this is an abstention from their duties as a sovereignty body in relation to our own sovereignty. Portugal cannot abstain in any case, in this or others that it seems that they want to associate with it. Cooperation cannot lead to this, and there is only this kind of cooperation, which is not any cooperation, because the Public Ministry and the Judicial Police are afraid, and prefer another solution.
"It seems that in Portugal is afraid of this investigation"
But there is a Portuguese investigation. The inquiry runs its terms.

There is a Portuguese, but if there is a Portuguese investigation we have our doubts. If there was a Portuguese investigation, Portugal had to have already questioned the individual who is detained in Germany, and interviewed as a witness the people, or the person, who say that he confessed to the practice of this crime of pseudo-abduction.

It seems that in Portugal one is afraid of this investigation, and then one thinks: 'ah, do they solve? Then let them sort it out. That's not us.'

Germany, and this prosecutor, are becoming owners and lords of other situations that happened in Portugal, in which it is said that the individual is also suspected. It was also he who raped another person, who abused, the German authorities say that in addition to the Madeleine case, which they already assume are them investigating, which is no longer Portugal, there are other cases that happened in Portugal. And then I ask. How does the prosecution allow this?

The German public prosecutor's office promises to complete its work soon. In the book it is clear that he considers that this investigation has no credibility.

There's nothing to link the individual to Madeleine McCann. Nothing. Nor in the material that was found in the searches carried out in Germany, were objects, machines, photographs, computers, computer things and not only, nor in what was seized by the Portuguese police inside the apartment where the child disappeared.

They can't get the guy into that apartment. So what do they do? They do what they're all about. He raped an old American woman on Luz Beach, he's been abusing an Irish woman, and so on, he's got a lot of lawsuits.

Okay, he may have done all this, but where are the clues linking him to Madeleine McCann? And then they will answer to him that there is a witness, who to them is a witness without any motivation and credible, who gave a spontaneous statement regarding what happened. And it's all about this witness.

Until another type of more credible evidence appears, it continues to value above all the progress report that its team produced in 2007. According to these findings, do the child's parents still have much to explain?

The only thing I can tell you is the point at which the investigation was in September 2007, in which it is said that the corpse was concealed, that there was an accidental death of the child, and that the disappearance is precisely due to this accidental death.

The only thing I can tell you is the point at which the investigation was in September 2007, in which it is said that the corpse was concealed, that there was an accidental death of the child, and that the disappearance is precisely due to this accidental death.

The only thing I can tell you is the point at which the investigation was in September 2007, in which it is said that the corpse was concealed, that there was an accidental death of the child, and that the disappearance is precisely due to this accidental death.

"The investigation has to know what is the relationship between taking this medicine and the possible death of the child"

Therefore, there is an involvement of the parents – who had responsibility for the custody of the child – in their disappearance. And we're not going any further than that, I don't talk about criminal involvement. I try to be as objective as possible, and more objective is to say that there are indications in the involvement of the mysterious disappearance of the child.
There's strong evidence of a kidnapping crime. We ask, and we keep asking, if it's said there's a real kidnapping why do you simulate a kidnapping? The way forward, not being them to speak, has to be through the reconstitution of the facts with everyone, which after 14 years is still plausible to do.

In this book Gonçalo Amaral explores more deeply the absence of information about the child who disappeared. He says that Portuguese research never had access, for example, to his medical history.

In an investigation into disappearance, child abduction, child abuse, the first thing you need to know is the victim. And this victim, we were never allowed to know her, particularly with such a medical history.

These children were medicated, or given to sleep a medically named Calpol, which is an antihistamine, that put them to sleep. The investigation has to know what is the relationship between taking this medicine and the possible death of the child. And for that we need the clinical history. We need to know if she had a problem.
https://rr.sapo.pt/noticia/pais/2021/10/15/goncalo-amaral-o-medo-da-justica-portuguesa-e-as-mentiras-da-justica-alema-no-caso-maddie/256864/

[Eleanor]

Definitely mentally unstable, if he thinks we are all as daft as he is, or have very short memories.

[G-Unit]

Are you saying Amaral does not enjoy active support from McCann sceptics in this country and elsewhere?  That he does not have supporters who post on forums and other social media?  Is that what you believe?  Oooook then, that’s up to you. 

If you want me to believe your hyperbolic pronouncements some evidence supporting them woulld help.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If you want me to believe your hyperbolic pronouncements some evidence supporting them woulld help.

What exact do you find hyperbolic about the term “Amaral’s supporters”?

[Vertigo Swirl]

If you want me to believe your hyperbolic pronouncements some evidence supporting them woulld help.

Was Amaral completely deluded when he wrote this in your opinion?

Dr Amaral has a message of thanks for his friends and supporters <3

https://www.facebook.com/goncalodesousa.amaral/posts/815996971813683

"Friends, I have to thank the many messages of support that I have arrived. This support has been translated also through The Blog Project Justice Goncalo Amaral, created in 2009 by a group of friends to help me in the fight for the truth and the achievement of justice. It is through this project that has been channelled the material support, without which would not have come here. I hope I can continue to be with you for your help. Thank you very much." http://pjga.blogspot.pt/

Amigos, não posso deixar de agradecer as numerosas mensagens de apoio que me têm chegado. Este apoio tem-se traduzido também através do blogue Projecto Justiça Gonçalo Amaral, criado em 2009 por um grupo de amigos para me ajudar na luta pela verdade e pela realização da justiça. É através deste Projecto que se tem canalizado o apoio material, sem o qual não teria chegado aqui. Espero poder continuar a contar com a vossa ajuda. Muito obrigado."

[Vertigo Swirl]

“What a genuinely lovely man😀”
“He will always have our support , we love his strength and courage x”
“☺️ shame the world doesn't have more decent men like him x”
“What a courageous man! 😘”
“He has a lot of people on his side why should he suffer for the likes of those pair Lovely Man he is”
“There are very few courageous gents in this world but goncola you are 1 of them xxx”
“Go Amaral !   im on ur side ,,,  please keep going”
“Don't give up GA as we are all behind you here. This is one set back that is unjust. But you will reach justice soon. Here in Australia I'm gutted for you ( devastated)”

Just a tiny fraction of the messages of support from Amaral’s supporters.  Do let me know if you’d like some more evidence that Amaral has supporters and I will supply it.  And if you need evidence that bears poop in the woods and that the Pope is a Catholic I can probably supply that as well (an address for where to send the bear shit might be necessary however).

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

You think you are reliably informed... I'm sure you are not.

I've seen some of the book... More fantasy from aamaral.
He says now that the only certain thing is the child disappeared... So it's clear he's backtracking

Interesting you see apparent "backtracking" as yet "more fantasy from Amaral"!

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

INTERVIEW
Gonçalo Amaral. The "fear" of Portuguese justice and the "lies" of German justice in the Maddie case
Oct 14, 2021 - 16:54 • Celso Paiva Sol

On the day his new book "Maddie - Enough Lies" hits the retail market, the former PJ inspector, who led the first few months of research, says what he thinks of the German investigation and goes back to saying that the parents of the English child still have much to explain about that day May 3, 2007.

Gonçalo Amaral accuses the public prosecutor and the Judicial Police of being afraid to investigate the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Of witnessing an unforgivable breach of a violation of national sovereignty, apparently, for fear of reaching politically incorrect conclusions.

On the day his new book "Maddie - Enough Lies" hits the retail market, the former PJ inspector, who led the first few months of research, says what he thinks of the German investigation and goes back to saying that the parents of the English child still have much to explain about that day May 3, 2007.

We started this conversation with the challenge to answer the question you put on the cover of the book. 14 years later, why don't we know the truth?

For fear of the police and the Portuguese prosecutors, I have no doubt about it.

Afraid of what?

Fear of an investigation that is not politically correct. The Portuguese judicial authorities seem to prefer others to resolve the matter, and this is an abstention from their duties as a sovereignty body in relation to our own sovereignty. Portugal cannot abstain in any case, in this or others that it seems that they want to associate with it. Cooperation cannot lead to this, and there is only this kind of cooperation, which is not any cooperation, because the Public Ministry and the Judicial Police are afraid, and prefer another solution.
"It seems that in Portugal is afraid of this investigation"
But there is a Portuguese investigation. The inquiry runs its terms.

There is a Portuguese, but if there is a Portuguese investigation we have our doubts. If there was a Portuguese investigation, Portugal had to have already questioned the individual who is detained in Germany, and interviewed as a witness the people, or the person, who say that he confessed to the practice of this crime of pseudo-abduction.

It seems that in Portugal one is afraid of this investigation, and then one thinks: 'ah, do they solve? Then let them sort it out. That's not us.'

Germany, and this prosecutor, are becoming owners and lords of other situations that happened in Portugal, in which it is said that the individual is also suspected. It was also he who raped another person, who abused, the German authorities say that in addition to the Madeleine case, which they already assume are them investigating, which is no longer Portugal, there are other cases that happened in Portugal. And then I ask. How does the prosecution allow this?

The German public prosecutor's office promises to complete its work soon. In the book it is clear that he considers that this investigation has no credibility.

There's nothing to link the individual to Madeleine McCann. Nothing. Nor in the material that was found in the searches carried out in Germany, were objects, machines, photographs, computers, computer things and not only, nor in what was seized by the Portuguese police inside the apartment where the child disappeared.

They can't get the guy into that apartment. So what do they do? They do what they're all about. He raped an old American woman on Luz Beach, he's been abusing an Irish woman, and so on, he's got a lot of lawsuits.

Okay, he may have done all this, but where are the clues linking him to Madeleine McCann? And then they will answer to him that there is a witness, who to them is a witness without any motivation and credible, who gave a spontaneous statement regarding what happened. And it's all about this witness.

Until another type of more credible evidence appears, it continues to value above all the progress report that its team produced in 2007. According to these findings, do the child's parents still have much to explain?

The only thing I can tell you is the point at which the investigation was in September 2007, in which it is said that the corpse was concealed, that there was an accidental death of the child, and that the disappearance is precisely due to this accidental death.

The only thing I can tell you is the point at which the investigation was in September 2007, in which it is said that the corpse was concealed, that there was an accidental death of the child, and that the disappearance is precisely due to this accidental death.

The only thing I can tell you is the point at which the investigation was in September 2007, in which it is said that the corpse was concealed, that there was an accidental death of the child, and that the disappearance is precisely due to this accidental death.

"The investigation has to know what is the relationship between taking this medicine and the possible death of the child"

Therefore, there is an involvement of the parents – who had responsibility for the custody of the child – in their disappearance. And we're not going any further than that, I don't talk about criminal involvement. I try to be as objective as possible, and more objective is to say that there are indications in the involvement of the mysterious disappearance of the child.
There's strong evidence of a kidnapping crime. We ask, and we keep asking, if it's said there's a real kidnapping why do you simulate a kidnapping? The way forward, not being them to speak, has to be through the reconstitution of the facts with everyone, which after 14 years is still plausible to do.

In this book Gonçalo Amaral explores more deeply the absence of information about the child who disappeared. He says that Portuguese research never had access, for example, to his medical history.

In an investigation into disappearance, child abduction, child abuse, the first thing you need to know is the victim. And this victim, we were never allowed to know her, particularly with such a medical history.

These children were medicated, or given to sleep a medically named Calpol, which is an antihistamine, that put them to sleep. The investigation has to know what is the relationship between taking this medicine and the possible death of the child. And for that we need the clinical history. We need to know if she had a problem.
https://rr.sapo.pt/noticia/pais/2021/10/15/goncalo-amaral-o-medo-da-justica-portuguesa-e-as-mentiras-da-justica-alema-no-caso-maddie/256864/

Sloppy to continue to mix up Calpol and Fenergan.

[G-Unit]

What exact do you find hyperbolic about the term “Amaral’s supporters”?

Nothing. It was this rather vulgarly put assertion; "all the people who are busting a gut trying to buy his crappy book"

[Mr Gray]

Interesting you see apparent "backtracking" as yet "more fantasy from Amaral"!

I don't... His book  contains both

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

I don't... His book  contains both

In your opinion.

[Mr Gray]

In your opinion.

No it's factual

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nothing. It was this rather vulgarly put assertion; "all the people who are busting a gut trying to buy his crappy book"

Don’t lie please.

You challenged my post
“Well I'm not on there if that's what you're implying.  Strange there are so few Amaral supporters defending their man on there though, what's stopping them all?”
with the following

“Perhaps there's no such thing as 'Amaral supporters'? Not cast in the same mould as 'McCann supporters anyway, imol

I have proven there is such a thing as Amaral supporters.  If you want eveidence of these supporters busting a gut to put money in Amaral’s bank account for a book they can’t even read I suggest you wander back to your favourite forum and open your eyes..

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

No it's factual

Amaral's book? I certainly thought his first one was factual. He presented the evidence and put forward three main theories. It's no secret that he personally believes the strongest theory, in his opinion, is that this is a case of parental child neglect, accidental death and concealment of a corpse. He seems to agree with the suspicion of Kate McCann that the children may have been drugged. In my opinion he is barking behind the wrong sofa when he makes reference to Calpol. A strange error especially so when drugs that actually were antihistamines were found in 5A.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Amaral's book? I certainly thought his first one was factual. He presented the evidence and put forward three main theories. It's no secret that he personally believes the strongest theory, in his opinion, is that this is a case of parental child neglect, accidental death and concealment of a corpse. He seems to agree with the suspicion of Kate McCann that the children may have been drugged. In my opinion he is barking behind the wrong sofa when he makes reference to Calpol. A strange error especially so when drugs that actually were antihistamines were found in 5A.

Is he still going on about Calpol?  And people wonder why some think he's an idiot.