Maddie Basta de Mentiras

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Wolters has got a bit more to go on than Amaral had.

I'd say he's got far less.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What do the dog alerts mean to you? Do you believe Eddie was barking at the presence of blood and not cadaverine? Also, you should cut Amaral a bit of slack. Wasn't it some British officers who reportedly told him "we'd have brought people in for less"? In addition he was somewhat misled, imo, with the earliest reports from the FSS.... I believe he got the impression initially that some of the results were more conclusive than the later report.... Remember: Q - "Could this be Madeleine's DNA?"... A - "the short answer is yes".....  ?

What was the long answer?

[Mr Gray]

What do the dog alerts mean to you? Do you believe Eddie was barking at the presence of blood and not cadaverine? Also, you should cut Amaral a bit of slack. Wasn't it some British officers who reportedly told him "we'd have brought people in for less"? In addition he was somewhat misled, imo, with the earliest reports from the FSS.... I believe he got the impression initially that some of the results were more conclusive than the later report.... Remember: Q - "Could this be Madeleine's DNA?"... A - "the short answer is yes".....  ?

have you read amarals book...there is some absolute rubbish in there.


I dont know what Eddie alerted to ...i dont think anyone does but what i know is taht amaral was wrong.

amaral claimed the alerts CONFIRMED the pat presence of  abody in 5a. That is not true....do you understand that, So amaral iswrong on that point amd tahts what his theory is based on.

The only reports for what you have posted are from amaral and I dont trust aword he says..because of the above and what comes next.

Amaral claimed there was an initial report from the FSS....i think thats another one of his mistakes. According to a report in Netflix aamaral and the PJ only read the first papargraph where it said the sample had 15 out of 19 markers..he didnt raed the rest...total idiot. From what i can see amaral is totally incompetent and when Wolters reveals his evidence amaral will be proved to be  a total fool

[Eleanor]

I'd say he's got far less.

The McCanns have never so much as been arrested let alone convicted of Rape and Paedophilia.

[Mr Gray]

I'd say he's got far less.

Most sceptics cant beleive Wolters because it would mean.amaral...the dogs and grime are wrong. I think you fall into that group. Wolters has the evidence taht will show just how wrong tehy all were...imo

[jassi]

The McCanns have never so much as been arrested let alone convicted of Rape and Paedophilia.

Has it ever been suggested they should have been ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

The McCanns have never so much as been arrested let alone convicted of Rape and Paedophilia.

Or even of lying as has the author of “Enough Of the Lies”.  Ironic innit.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Has it ever been suggested they should have been ?

yes.

[Eleanor]

Has it ever been suggested they should have been ?

Are you being serious?

[jassi]

Are you being serious?

I just wondered why you should mention something that has never happened .

[Eleanor]

I just wondered why you should mention something that has never happened .

You could try following the conversation.

[jassi]

You could try following the conversation.

I take each post as it is presented.

[Brietta]

Do you really think his supporters care about factual accuracy when it comes to anything he says or writes?  Of course not!  As long as he’s still spouting the same “parents dunnit “ mantra he can do no wrong in their eyes.

I think Amaral continues signalling severe psychosis with every interview he gives.  What motivates his supporters to encourage him in this is certainly a strange one to fathom. 

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

What was the long answer?

That the result was "inconclusive" . 15 of Madeleine's DNA markers were identified in some samples, but there were at least two other contributors (I wonder who?).... Science moves on... and we already have Dr Purlin claim he can make sense of the raw data if allowed to examine the results.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

have you read amarals book...there is some absolute rubbish in there.


I dont know what Eddie alerted to ...i dont think anyone does but what i know is taht amaral was wrong.

amaral claimed the alerts CONFIRMED the pat presence of  abody in 5a. That is not true....do you understand that, So amaral iswrong on that point amd tahts what his theory is based on.

The only reports for what you have posted are from amaral and I dont trust aword he says..because of the above and what comes next.

Amaral claimed there was an initial report from the FSS....i think thats another one of his mistakes. According to a report in Netflix aamaral and the PJ only read the first papargraph where it said the sample had 15 out of 19 markers..he didnt raed the rest...total idiot. From what i can see amaral is totally incompetent and when Wolters reveals his evidence amaral will be proved to be  a total fool

I've read his book twice and watched the video. I think he gets closer to an answer than OG ever did, in my opinion. I'm sure I didn't agree with all his book, but I don't recall anything standing out as "fantasy". As for the dog alerts I think it is fanciful to suggest that Eddie was not alerting to what he's been trained to alert to. Furthermore Keela also alerted in some of the same areas and as we know forensic evidence (blood, in my opinion) was collected and examined by the FSS. As you know the results were "inconclusive", but Eddie and Keela certainly did what they are trained to do.