Author Topic: The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect  (Read 158132 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

The point is that CB has shown he has the ability to launch a libel action if he wants.. So why hasn't he sued Wolters

Offline jassi

Was he prosecuted for this animal neglect ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

The point is that CB has shown he has the ability to launch a libel action if he wants.. So why hasn't he sued Wolters

CB hasn't launched a libel action. He has made a criminal complaint.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

CB hasn't launched a libel action. He has made a criminal complaint.

A criminal complaint re defamation... Another word for libel.. LOL

So after all your claims... Why hasn't he done the same re Wolters

Offline jassi

I don't think Wolters has actually named him publicly, so that might make a difference.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

I don't think Wolters has actually named him publicly, so that might make a difference.

He has

Offline jassi

Really? I thought Wolters  always  referred to him as CB and it's the media that has done all the expose
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Really? I thought Wolters  always  referred to him as CB and it's the media that has done all the expose
He has referred to him as Christian B.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

He has referred to him as Christian B.
I've already given a cite where he acknowledged his full name

Offline Myster

It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.


Offline Vertigo Swirl

HCW dropped the clanger around 13:10 minutes in...

https://omny.fm/shows/they-ve-taken-her/maddies-dead?in_playlist=they-ve-taken-her!podcast
Perhaps Brückner hasn’t heard this. Maybe one of his fan club should forward it to his lawyer.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Myster

Perhaps Brückner hasn’t heard this. Maybe one of his fan club should forward it to his lawyer.
FF is looking for the Exit door, so it'll have to be the next sucker waiting in line.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline G-Unit

A criminal complaint re defamation... Another word for libel.. LOL

So after all your claims... Why hasn't he done the same re Wolters

Criminal defamation differs from civil defamation, so the two aren't the same LOL. Perhaps a complaint about Wolters has been made for all we know.

It seems the 'half a fingerprint' evidence in the Behan case is a journalistic invention. It's very difficult to decide which are 'known facts' and which are speculations, that's for sure.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Criminal defamation differs from civil defamation, so the two aren't the same LOL. Perhaps a complaint about Wolters has been made for all we know.

It seems the 'half a fingerprint' evidence in the Behan case is a journalistic invention. It's very difficult to decide which are 'known facts' and which are speculations, that's for sure.
says who?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".