The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect

[Brietta]

Gerry McCann searched under the beds;

He remembers that after it was known that Madeleine had disappeared he looked for her all over the apartment. He particularly remembers having looked under all the beds
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-ARGUIDO.htm

I know she was small for her age, but would she have fitted under there?

Every normal and natural reaction of parents to the most stressful event of their lives is cynically questioned by you who cannot even know for certain that is the bed Gerry actually looked under.

Didn't the Portuguese police also check under the beds for a missing, possibly hiding child?  If they didn't - why didn't they! 

Standard procedure I would have thought.

In which way does your post approximate information regarding any known facts about Brueckner.

In which way does it address speculation about Brueckner. 

Is it your suggestion that Brueckner may have been hiding under the bed you think Gerry may have looked under when it was discovered Madeleine was missing?

[barrier]

Yeah there is a distinct possibility that Brueckner was already in the apartment and was startled by Gerry's return but I don't think he lit up necessitating ventilation.
There are any number of reasons why he may have opened the window but without a doubt that was not one of them; for example it did not appear to be his MO as it has not been reported or suggested by any of his other victims.

The point of the cigarette ash contamination is that anecdotal evidence has police officers on hand contaminating the crime scene; there never was any suggestion that the perpetrator stopped what he was doing to have a break for a ciggy; but you know that already don't you - but why pass up the opportunity to try another tiresome wind up.

Is it to be taken you know for certain CB is the alleged abductor and was in 5a , seems your post is a statement of fact.

[Brietta]

Eleanor & Vertigo seem quite keen on the idea.

and it really isn't my fault the 'abduction' of Madeleine McCann presents so much opportunity for ridicule.

I don't find it appropriate to make fun of or ridicule the fact that a little three year old child was taken from her family and has never been seen since.

I find it ridiculous that there are people who obviously derive some sort of satisfaction from the "wind up" material provided by the fact a druggie paedophile and rapist is the BKA prime suspect in the her murder and have no shame in anonymously broadcasting the fact.

[Wonderfulspam]

Is it to be taken you know for certain CB is the alleged abductor and was in 5a , seems your post is a statement of fact.

"I don't find it appropriate to make fun of or ridicule the fact that a little three year old child was taken from her family and has never been seen since."


That's the problem see, Brietta knows as a matter of fact that Maddie was definitely abducted, although she doesn't explain how she knows this.

She is of course, completely wrong, since I know that infact she wasn't.

[Brietta]

"I don't find it appropriate to make fun of or ridicule the fact that a little three year old child was taken from her family and has never been seen since."


That's the problem see, Brietta knows as a matter of fact that Maddie was definitely abducted, although she doesn't explained how she knows this.

She is of course, completely wrong, since I know that infact she wasn't.

For the purposes of this thread the sad but true FACT of the matter is that Brueuckner is the only declared suspect for what German investigators have said is the murder of a child.

[Wonderfulspam]

The list is rather long, this is but a few from memory, no doubt many many more ,Peter Stuyvesant, Marlborough, Gauloises, Embassy , B&H, roll ups, them menthanol ones, oh which one would it be ?

Brueckner presumably smoked weed, harden stoners know the secret of menthol spliffs, not so sure about smoking methanol though, not sure I'd advise that.

[G-Unit]

I don't find it appropriate to make fun of or ridicule the fact that a little three year old child was taken from her family and has never been seen since.

I find it ridiculous that there are people who obviously derive some sort of satisfaction from the "wind up" material provided by the fact a druggie paedophile and rapist is the BKA prime suspect in the her murder and have no shame in anonymously broadcasting the fact.

I don't see people ridiculing the fact that a child disappeared. I see people ridiculing some of the ridiculous theories which have been proposed to explain that disappearance.

My problem with the German authorities is that they seem to have found their suspect by listening to various informants, then set out to find evidence of his involvement. Some years on, they still don't appear to have found enough to lay charges. His previous convictions, although they suggest he could be the perpetrator, are not evidence that he was involved.

[barrier]

For the purposes of this thread the sad but true FACT of the matter is that Brueuckner is the only declared suspect for what German investigators have said is the murder of a child.

Yep, don't make him right though .

[barrier]

Brueckner presumably smoked weed, harden stoners know the secret of menthol spliffs, not so sure about smoking methanol though, not sure I'd advise that.

Good spot, I wondered who would see it, this weed stuff , I never could find it on the shelf .

[jassi]

Good spot, I wondered who would see it, this weed stuff , I never could find it on the shelf .

Have you tried a Garden Centre ?

[barrier]

Have you tried a Garden Centre ?

In-between the flower pot men I always presumed,

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't see people ridiculing the fact that a child disappeared. I see people ridiculing some of the ridiculous theories which have been proposed to explain that disappearance.

My problem with the German authorities is that they seem to have found their suspect by listening to various informants, then set out to find evidence of his involvement. Some years on, they still don't appear to have found enough to lay charges. His previous convictions, although they suggest he could be the perpetrator, are not evidence that he was involved.

Yet you seem to have a very high tolerance for all the ridiculous theories of parental involvement.  No one here who has been ridiculed today or yesterday has put forward a ridiculous theory to explain Madeleine's disappearance so you will have to come up for another reason for why we are being ridiculed. 

[The General]

Good spot, I wondered who would see it, this weed stuff , I never could find it on the shelf .

I've smoked methanol. In 'nam.

[Mr Gray]

I don't see people ridiculing the fact that a child disappeared. I see people ridiculing some of the ridiculous theories which have been proposed to explain that disappearance.

My problem with the German authorities is that they seem to have found their suspect by listening to various informants, then set out to find evidence of his involvement. Some years on, they still don't appear to have found enough to lay charges. His previous convictions, although they suggest he could be the perpetrator, are not evidence that he was involved.

To have a suspect pointed out then find evidence against them is standard police practice... Exactly what happened with levi Bellfield.. So I don't know what you find strange about that.

The BKK have what they refer to as concrete evidence and are 100 %  CB is their man. Do you really think they don't have compelling evidencce...

[The General]

To have a suspect pointed out then find evidence against them is standard police practice... Exactly what happened with levi Bellfield.. So I don't know what you find strange about that.

The BKK have what they refer to as concrete evidence and are 100 %  CB is their man. Do you really think they don't have compelling evidencce...

What about the guy they have a conviction for? I suppose a means to an end for your lot.