Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance.

[kizzy]

If you think GA has more support in his beliefs... You are deluded. He has been proved wrong on the evidence he has relied on

Well, he is still going strong ....even wrote another book.

Who knows he may even end up making a movie.

[Wonderfulspam]

He seems to have been well known in certain circles in his adopted home town Luz.  People such as he were apparently priority interviewees.  Nobody interviewed him despite him being on the police radar.  Why not?  Why did it take until 2013 and Operation Grange to locate his phone number in evidence from 2007?

Motive and Cui Bono comes into it yet again.  The most obvious here being money.

Because they didn't have any evidence, or the slightest indication that he, in particular, was in any way involved in Madeleine's disappearance, perhaps?

Mind you, they didn't have any evidence Maddie was actually abducted in the first place, other than because the McCanns said so.

[Wonderfulspam]

Well, he is still going strong ....even wrote another book.

Who knows he may even end up making a movie.

Can't wait to see Brueckner's movie.

[kizzy]

You tell me - you're the moderator around here.  I'm thoroughly confused about what is and isn't allowed on here these days (you seem ok with the idea of me examining Murat's possible motive for example).  I will say however that it's quite hard to destroy the good name of a convicted rapist, thief and child molester and further than it's already been been destroyed by his own proven actions.

All it boils down to is simply did he abduct Maddie....if you don't believe Maddie was abducted in the first place

 How can he be

[Brietta]

Well, he is still going strong ....even wrote another book.

Who knows he may even end up making a movie.

Who knows, I rather doubt it.  But he could entitle it as "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance?"

For many documented reasons the person with an exceedingly strong motive for much of what happened in 2007 and since was the PJ office boy.
Maybe Amaral could expand on that from rags to riches theme in his movie.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not really as at the beginning who would have thought this was going to turn out as it did.

I don't think for one minute the book would have taken off [as a best seller] if it wasn't for the mccs suing GA.

I would say most then bought the book in support of GA, I did it myself although it was in Portuguese.

IMO the reason for him writing the book was in a way to be a voice for Maddie.

He truly believes the abduction was faked....and the mccs had a motive to do that.

Answer to your other post,...

I truly believe in my heart that the mccs are involved in Maddie's disappearance....otherwise there is no way ever I would still be on here.

As for the slur, I don't believe their story...I have no sympathy at all.

There is nothing wrong with following your principles...or beliefs if you truly believe them to be right.

Re your claim above.  Have you any idea what you are talking about I wonder?  What date did Amaral publish his book?  I'll tell you - it was in 2008 the day after the case was archived and it became an instant bestseller in Portugal.  Now, any idea when the McCanns decided to launch a legal action against Amaral?    Obviously not because if you had you'd know that what you've written is nonsense. 
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/may/17/mccanns-sue-portugese-detective-madeleine

[Brietta]

What are you trying to say in your post - all it reminds me of is Roy Cropper.

Would you care  B if it had been about CB or GA?

The post topic is - "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance?"  Please bear that in mind when posting. TY

[faithlilly]

He seems to have been well known in certain circles in his adopted home town Luz.  People such as he were apparently priority interviewees.  Nobody interviewed him despite him being on the police radar.  Why not?  Why did it take until 2013 and Operation Grange to locate his phone number in evidence from 2007?

Motive and Cui Bono comes into it yet again.  The most obvious here being money.

Yet OG did nothing with the information that they acquired.

[Admin]

Please attack the post and not the poster!  I will remove any posts which breach this rule.

Admin

[G-Unit]

                                 "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance."

Your concern for the rights of a career criminal convicted of brutal rape and child sexual abuse does you proud on this a "Justice" Forum.

Though one struggles with the suggestion Brueckner has been "defamed" here.

What isn't OK is to defame innocent people and I regret that rather than recognising the posts on this thread and objecting to it you appear to condone as well as contribute.  Strange one that.

You seem to think that anyone with a criminal record can't be defamed.

Who are these 'innocent people' who, iyo, are being defamed here, btw?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You seem to think that anyone with a criminal record can't be defamed.

Who are these 'innocent people' who, iyo, are being defamed here, btw?

Is it OK to defame people without a criminal record by discussing their motives for staging an abduction and disposing of a body?  You still haven't answered. 

[kizzy]

Is it OK to defame people without a criminal record by discussing their motives for staging an abduction and disposing of a body?  You still haven't answered.

Most people can have a motive to do things without a criminal record.

What my point was who had the motive to make Maddie disappear? CB or them mccs

Simply because C B it seems by some is the abductor with no evidence to back that up.

I do think a motive for CB is a bit thin on the ground judging by posts.

As usuall posts full of attack are made defending the mccs ...when it isn't unnatural to believe the mccs had more of a motive than CB.

It's between who you believe was responsible for Maddie's disappearance...after all the mccs were the last person to c Maddie -  what proof is there that CB was.

[Wonderfulspam]

You seem to think that anyone with a criminal record can't be defamed.

Who are these 'innocent people' who, iyo, are being defamed here, btw?

Well she can't mean the McCanns, because they haven't proven their innocence.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Most people can have a motive to do things without a criminal record.

What my point was who had the motive to make Maddie disappear? CB or them mccs

Simply because C B it seems by some is the abductor with no evidence to back that up.

I do think a motive for CB is a bit thin on the ground judging by posts.

As usuall posts full of attack are made defending the mccs ...when it isn't unnatural to believe the mccs had more of a motive than CB.

It's between who you believe was responsible for Maddie's disappearance...after all the mccs were the last person to c Maddie -  what proof is there that CB was.

In my opinion your posts are becoming more and more nonsensical.  There is no solid evidence that backs up the theory that the McCanns disappeared their daughter is there?  Because if there was they would have been charged wouldn't they?   There are some people here who believe that the more time that elapses without charging a suspect the less likely they are to have committed the crime.  Where does that leave the McCanns as suspects then?  Even less likely to have committed the crime than Bruckner!  Amazing logic huh? 

[Brietta]

You seem to think that anyone with a criminal record can't be defamed.

Who are these 'innocent people' who, iyo, are being defamed here, btw?

                                "Who had the motive for Maddie's disappearance."

Remaining with the topic but not the spirit of the thread.
Who do you think had the motive to abduct Madeleine, and how do you think they got away with it up till now.