Brueckner charged with sexual offences in cases unrelated to Madeleine

[Eleanor]

I think Madeleine is but a bye story in the CB saga, I see its said on sleuths that a Madeleine docu was shown again on German TV appealing for victims to come forward, murder victims can't so that must mean sex crime victims, strangely in all of this only one alleged murder victim ?

How do you know there weren't any others if they are all dead?

[barrier]

How do you know there weren't any others if they are all dead?

How does a murder victim come forward? I think it's fair to say CB appears to be some kind of sexual deviant, yet only one alleged murder victim ?

[Eleanor]

How does a murder victim come forward? I think it's fair to say CB appears to be some kind of sexual deviant, yet only one alleged murder victim ?

Even Murderers have to start somewhere.

[barrier]

Even Murderers have to start somewhere.

Indeed they do but that was in 2007 allegedly, the charges for his sex crimes put dates between 2005 and 2017  no more alleged murders in between? even now with all the publicity since June 2020 .Wolters never claimed concrete evidence in the sex crimes but yet brings charges, concrete evidence in the Madeleine  case and no charges, go figure.

[Eleanor]

Indeed they do but that was in 2007 allegedly, the charges for his sex crimes put dates between 2005 and 2017  no more alleged murders in between? even now with all the publicity since June 2020 .Wolters never claimed concrete evidence in the sex crimes but yet brings charges, concrete evidence in the Madeleine  case and no charges, go figure.

Brueckner was extraordinarily lucky to escape notice in 2007.  Go figure that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

How does a murder victim come forward? I think it's fair to say CB appears to be some kind of sexual deviant, yet only one alleged murder victim ?

Why do you have a problem with this?  Is there a law that says a murderer must always commit more than one murder if not immediately apprehended?  In any case he may have murdered others either before or after Madeleine, how can be sure he didn’t?

[barrier]

Why do you have a problem with this?  Is there a law that says a murderer must always commit more than one murder if not immediately apprehended?  In any case he may have murdered others either before or after Madeleine, how can be sure he didn’t?

I'm sure you'll reveal how you know he killed Madeleine

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm sure you'll reveal how you know he killed Madeleine

When did I say I knew he killed Madeleine?  Please don’t be a plonker.

[barrier]

When did I say I knew he killed Madeleine?  Please don’t be a plonker.

You said he may have murdered before or after Madeleine therefore indicating he murdered Madeline, cut the siping out.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You said he may have murdered before or after Madeleine therefore indicating he murdered Madeline, cut the siping out.

I’ve no idea what siping is but your comprehension skills are sorely lacking.  For the avoidance of any doubt: I do not KNOW he killed Madeleine, not did I ever say that I did.  Now grow up.

[Brietta]

Quite obviously it is a waste of time posting links to intelligent points made by knowledgeable and intelligent commentators.

Allow me to reiterate some points made  https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12454.msg693663#msg693663  Brueckner has a supportive following for one reason only and that is entirely because of the incapability some have of viewing his crimes for what they are and not through the prism of Madeleine McCann's case.

Whether or not Brueckner is guilty of crimes against Madeleine "He's a man that's been committing sexual crimes for long periods of time.
"The likelihood is that he would have committed many, many offences, most of them would have gone unrecorded and unreported. This would be just the tip of the iceberg for him." and last week the German authorities charged him with crimes against women and children "in Portugal, spanning 17 years between 2000 and 2017."

I don't know if it is normal behaviour for those leaping to the defence of the indisputably already convicted sexual predator and sadist Brueckner to throw their collective weight behind similar offenders facing further charges, only they will know.
But it is an interesting thought that on this Justice forum there are those for whom the only case to be made is for perpetrators only and incredibly, everything is the fault of the victim.  Incredible but true.

[Eleanor]

The only victim of a miscarriage of justice for some appears to be Brueckner.

[Wonderfulspam]

Brueckner is a terrible man, rapist & paedophile.

Behan was a bit stupid going to bed & leaving the door unlocked after she thought someone had been in her room.

I think both of these statements are true.

[Brietta]

The only victim of a miscarriage of justice for some appears to be Brueckner.

In the full knowledge of the crimes for which Brueckner is presently doing jail time, the spectacle of members leaping to judgement and rubbishing the nature of the present charges he faces is nothing short of extraordinary.

"'I puked, to be honest with you, as reading about it took me right back to my experience.'" H. Behan https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8548021/Investigation-reopened-rape-ordeal-linked-Madeleine-McCann-kidnap-suspect.html

I recommend those currently victim blaming Ms Behan follow the link I have provided and glance at the balconies at the hotel, one of which Brueckner is charged with climbing through complete with his rape kit, to carry out the despicable attack he is accused of.

[Brietta]

The only victim of a miscarriage of justice for some appears to be Brueckner.

If the Portuguese had carried out proper investigation into the sex crimes rampant in their jurisdiction there was a fair chance that forensic evidence from the Behan rape (2004) and the DM rape (2005) could have been linked and dealt with appropriately at the time.
If he hadn't been at large in 2007 he would have had the firm alibi his apologists claim for him.