Author Topic: The sad mantra about neglect  (Read 75216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #210 on: August 03, 2013, 08:55:30 PM »
Thanks for that, Sadie.  I said 4.5 hour time-frame as I wanted to use only independent witnesses who saw Madeleine on the 3rd, to pre-empt any "Payne is lying", etc.  posts.  Your post is very interesting and makes the "window of opportunity" for any wrong-doing by the McCanns very slim indeed.


David payne visit:
- neithed Gerry or Kate mentioned it in their first statements, and for thatmatter, none of the others in the whole group

- he says he entered the apartment and had a three to five minute conversation with kate mccann IIRC timewise, with her in just a towel but doesnt remember what she was wearing

- she said he just popped his head round the door (you know the unlocked patio door while she was having a shower with her  three kids left playing alone)  answered it in her  towel, and didnt come in and this was all of 30 seconds

- he said the kids were all in their pyjamas, predomonantly *white*, err, Madeleinehad a bright pink top on

ps Sadie still waiting for you to provide proof that Payne said Gerry returned home at 8 pm, its ok, dont bother yourself, it doesnt exist, as it doesnt exist that Kate was bathing her kids at any time post 6pm, seeing as they both bathed them according to their statements by 6 pm before Gerry left for tennis


so Rachel, what we have is a 4.5 window or opportunity reduced to 3.5 hours if you believe the Payne story



load of stuff to pick through here dor anyone with hedex pills  and stamina LOL

1485    ”And imagine, remember what you saw.”
Reply    ”Mm.”
1485    ”Did you open the door, slid door? Or was it already open? Or…”
Reply    ”Err I think it was already open, I think it was already open. Err you know, as I say, I walked up there, Kate was you know I say looking very relaxed and err I say a comment to her I said well crikey it’s early, early for them to be getting ready you know for bed, as I say she said ah no, I’ve had such a good, you know such a good day and afternoon err so you know, and Gerry’s just obviously finishing off playing tennis and err so you know hopefully try and get them down and as I say we were just, you know I, I know, it does sound bizarre but I just looked at the three of them and I couldn’t, you know they were just so well presented and so clean and immaculate it was, you know I was, and you know they just looked such healthy children, err you know, there’s, there’s you know nothing that normally…”
1485    ”Yeah.”
Reply    ”Triggers in my mind like that but it was just how well that they looked and err…”
1485    ”Try to remember where in, where they were in the apartment.”
Reply    ”Err, I mean the, the time that I was there err you know all, all of them err all the children and Kate were in the, err as soon as you go through the patio doors err you know they were all in the immediate area you know in front of you, err that was the area that they generally, you know when I saw them, so I didn’t, no I didn’t go any further into the apartment, you know it was just a conversation that I like, you know walked into the, you know through the French doors, I went into the lounge err you know the open plan area and err you know just had a brief conversation, you know things started off by as I say, saying about the, how well they looked and you know, it’s early to get them ready for bed and then I said oh Gerry’s, you know just finished over there, we’re going over to play a bit of tennis, err I probably said is there any problems with that and she said ah no, no fine, you know carry on, and err you know perhaps a bit more of a conversation err but you know it, it wasn’t many minutes that I was, was there.”
1485    ”Yeah.”
Reply    ”But err certainly enough time just to see, you know, certainly the apartment, there was nothing that was untoward, that was you know err the children all looked extremely happy, there was no, you know signs of any problems with err you know Kate, you know or indeed the relationship that Kate had got with any of the three children. None of the children had been told off, none of the children looked like they were you know in trouble for anything, you know they were err still all talking and playing around. Err so you know it was just a very err transient you know that I’d gone in there, but as I say it just struck me how well they all looked.”
1485    ”Yeah.”
Reply    ”And content I suppose is the other word to use.”
1485    ”Did you actually go into the apartment?”
Reply    ”I did.”
1485    ”Or did you do the conversation from the door?”
Reply    ”No, definitely was inside the apartment, you know whether it be two or three steps into the apartment or you know however many, but I was definitely in the apartment.”
1485    ”Okay, so now what I’m gonna try and ask you to recollect, what everybody was wearing.”
Reply    ”I’m afraid that is, you know I’m, I cannot recall at all. I know that’s, you’d think that’d be an obvious thing to remember, I cannot remember. As I say the, from the children point of view predominantly I can remember the, you know, white, but I couldn’t say exactly what they were wearing. Err…”
1485    ”But could you remember what Kate was wearing for example?”
Reply    ”I can’t, no.”
1485    ”And did you actually set eyes on each individual child?”
Reply    ”All three children I saw, yeah.”
1485    ”And were they standing up? Sitting down?”
Reply    ”Err they were generally standing up, yeah.”
1485    ”Did they actually acknowledge you?”
Reply    ”Err oh yeah, you know I’m very sure that if you’d have asked them, you know that evening or the next day they’d all say ah yeah, I popped in. You know I, you know I did know the children very well, we’d all you know, met up many times before err you know I, you know again I’d be playing with Madeleine you know in the, err the play area err you know during that week, you know lifting her up, twizzing her round and everything, I knew her that well, you know, to do that, and as I say err she’d definitely know who I was and certainly, as I say, just to reinforce that she looked very happy.”
1485    ”Yeah. Was that the last time you saw Madeleine?”
Reply    ”It was.”
1485    ”How many minutes, you said as a matter of minutes and then you went back and then you played tennis.”
Reply    ”Mm.”
1485    ”I’m gonna pin you down and ask you how long you think you were in there for. I know you say minutes.”
Reply    ”In their apartment, it, it, I’d say three minutes, five maximum.”
1485    ”Three to five?”
Reply    ”Yeah.”
1485    ”So then you step back out, did you leave the doors open or did you close them?”
Reply    ”Err I couldn’t remember. You know, again, I’ve got the, in my mind that the doors were open when I went in and I probably would have just walked out back that way, you know, it still, I mean it’s still relatively nice outside, it was light and everything so err you know I, I, whether they kept the door open it’s just nice when it’s the end of the evening you know, sorry, you know the end of the afternoon, but if I’m perfectly honest the answer to that question is I can’t remember.”
1485    ”Okay. So then you went back and then you played, you played a game for about an hour?”
Reply    ”Yeah.”
1485    ”You think from seven, from about seven till about eight?”
Reply    ”Yeah, I mean it must, I mean it was before, I mean we got back before eight o’ clock err you know so perhaps just before seven, err sorry, err yeah just before seven so it was just before eight o’ clock. As I say when I got back I think I was cutting it fine and Fiona was still keen to go for a run and we started to get everyone ready for bed.”
1485    ”Yeah.”
Reply    ”And err so it was, as I say, about an hour but certainly we’d finished before eight o’ clock.”
1485    ”Okay, and when you finished, I’m just trying to put this in order here, when you actually, when you finished and you went back to the apartment, did you say anything to Gerry about, about the fact that his family were fine? Or…”
Reply    ”Yeah, err yeah, I haven’t mentioned this before, but yes, yeah I’d certainly, when we met up I said oh yeah, you know everything’s fine there, you know probably along the lines of you know you’ve got a bit more of a free pass you know you can carry on for a bit longer, Kate’s fine without everyone you know all the children are, are happy, there’s no difficulties with bath time or anything so you know, without actually saying all that just conveying to him that you know I don’t think you need to err rush back, you’ve got a free pass for a bit longer.”
1485    ”Alright.”
Reply    ”Err yeah.”
1485    ”So was that as soon as you got back to the, to the tennis courts?”
Reply    ”Yeah that would have been when we got back.”
« Last Edit: August 03, 2013, 10:21:05 PM by Redblossom »

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #211 on: August 03, 2013, 09:09:36 PM »

so Rachel, what we have is a 4.5 window or opportunity reduced to 3.5 hours if you believe the Payne story
But there's another Payne story : both Paynes with both McCanns in the flat at 19h.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #212 on: August 03, 2013, 09:25:21 PM »
But there's another Payne story : both Paynes with both McCanns in the flat at 19h.
well... So many stories, confusing isnt it
perhaps SY will sort  it all out and no one can bleat translation or other errors then
 8((()*/

« Last Edit: August 03, 2013, 09:33:47 PM by Redblossom »

Offline sadie

Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #213 on: August 03, 2013, 09:46:35 PM »
But there's another Payne story : both Paynes with both McCanns in the flat at 19h.
Source please

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #214 on: August 03, 2013, 09:49:29 PM »
well... So many stories, confusing isnt it
perhaps SY will sort  it all out and no one can bleat translation or other errors then
 8((()*/
A poster saw a correlation (don't remember which thread) between the fact the Paynes were always late and Mr Payne's difficulty in evaluating times.  How this had a multiplying effect on protagonists remains a mystery.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #215 on: August 03, 2013, 09:57:22 PM »
PJFiles, Volume XIII, pp. 3909-15

From DC 1756 Mike MARSHALL to Ricardo Paiva

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #216 on: August 03, 2013, 10:10:57 PM »
Source please



http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATERINA-PAYNE-INCIDENT.htm

Eta oops, sorry, cross posted anne

Odd statement if payne in his roggy said he went home at 8 pm

And also very very  odd statement if he said the last time he saw her was at 5 pm!!! Long before Gerry asked him  to go check in at 6 30 and long before the kids were let out of nursery, wierd
 >@@(*&)
hope SY are taking NOTES

« Last Edit: August 03, 2013, 10:37:48 PM by Redblossom »

Offline sadie

Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #217 on: August 03, 2013, 10:34:43 PM »
That is NOT Davids statement.  It is by a third party.

Please use Davids statements and prove your point.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #218 on: August 03, 2013, 10:36:18 PM »
This 17h must be some lost in passing from the 12am/pm system to the 24hours one.
19>7>17

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #219 on: August 03, 2013, 10:40:13 PM »
This 17h must be some lost in passing from the 12am/pm system to the 24hours one.
19>7>17
yes but still does not  make sense at 7pm either
 @)(++(*

By all their accounts

Something veryvery wrong here
« Last Edit: August 03, 2013, 10:43:01 PM by Redblossom »

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #220 on: August 03, 2013, 10:46:46 PM »
I think someone should have said thank you.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #221 on: August 03, 2013, 10:47:27 PM »
Are you seriously suggesting a small child let alone an adult could see anyone inside that restaraunt and from all that distance, and in the dark? and reversely, anyone inside it, see or hear the other way?

Matt Oldfield

The question asked, he relates that, due to the large size of the whole group, comprising nine adults (four couple and FP's mother), the deponent and the others always occupied the same table because it was the only one that could handle so many people.

Asked, he relates that, from where that table was positioned the group would have sight of the apartments they were occupying.

Nevertheless, he admits that it was a tenuous sight considering the distance to the apartments (estimated as about 50 to 100 metres), and further, due to their vision being impaired by a transparent oilcloth [tarpaulin] that covered the area in which the tables were located.

Consequently, he admits it being possible for someone to have entered the ground-floor apartments without being detected, through [by way of] the patios that were round the back of the residential block.

Martin Brunts video from 13.47

You can see the oilcloth and his view of the low visibility



 

Jo Moura, PI, investigated on the ground....No visual whatsoever

3.38


and again at 16.20



There are other references too.

Bump for sadie who likes bumping but ignores difficult questions, in yer own time though   8**8:/:


« Last Edit: August 04, 2013, 03:03:56 AM by John »

Offline Chinagirl

Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #222 on: August 03, 2013, 10:48:46 PM »
Because you've never heard of something doesn't mean it never happens.  People do go out and forget to lock doors, they leave keys under mats etc - (very handy if someone is watching).    This idea that no-one in the world only the McCanns have ever done the same as they did  - whether by accident or intentionally is just daft IMO.

Of course it was a mistake Faith.  They did not deliberately or maliciously put the children they adored in danger any more than the parents of children who drown in garden pools or in the bath or die in car accidents deliberately and knowingly caused those tragedies to happen.      But if you treat those parents the same as you treat the McCanns -  then in every instance you can make the same case against them as you do against the McCanns - because at the end of the day they were responsible and it was because of their actions, or lack of action that the tragedy happened. 

Thankfully most of us are far too busy feeling terribly sad for those parents to even want to add to their agony by starting up with the 'blame game', and that's because we know that as parents none of us can guarantee that we will never make a mistake ourselves.   We put it down to human error, and why the McCanns are not allowed by some people to be to be guilty of human error like everyone else is a mystery to me.         

         

Good post, Benice.  The McCanns were guilty of human error - not neglect.
A

Offline sadie

Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #223 on: August 03, 2013, 10:52:28 PM »
Thanks for that, Sadie.  I said 4.5 hour time-frame as I wanted to use only independent witnesses who saw Madeleine on the 3rd, to pre-empt any "Payne is lying", etc.  posts.  Your post is very interesting and makes the "window of opportunity" for any wrong-doing by the McCanns very slim indeed.

The time table for times that an opportunity arose between different independant witnesses seeing Madeleine, was unfortunately on another thread

I have copied it over herewith:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The only periods that Kate, or Kate and Gerry together, were alone with their family


Please note:
I have taken all the times from one statement or another ... and I haven't handpicked the statements.  Have just used the statements as they came to hand.

David Payne and Matt Oldfield and Jane Tanner are independent witnesses.

David saw Madeleine alive and well at about 6.35/6.40pm

Kate and Gerry were at the tapas restaurant apart for a short break from 8.30 to 10 pm.
[/size]


That leaves a period of 1 hour 50 minutes total when no-one outside the family saw Madeleine.

During that time, for 35 minutes both Mum and Dad were together with the children.  However,  during that 35 minute period Gerry showered and changed ready for the tapas restaurant.  Do you think a dirty deed was done then?



Alternatively considering kate on her own with the children
Davids visit was at 6.35 / 6.40pm.  He saw all three children alive and well.   Gerry arrived at about 7.55.   
That is a period of only 1hour 15minuteswhen Kate was alone with them. During this period Kate read to them and put them to bed.  She also showered, made up, did her hair and changed to clear the bathroom, ready for Gerry coming back.  Not much time left, was there?

Additionally had anything happened to Madeleine, she would have screamed Gerry or fetched him immediately.  Gerry has been her rock thru all this.

Nah ... nothing happened then either.


No other opportunities apart from in this 1 hour 50 minute period which I have just analysed for you, showing the unlikelyhood of such a thing happening as Zilch, tbh.




Summary of results
THe longest periods that Kate or Kate and Gerry together were alone with the three little ones.

Kate on her own = I hour 15 minutes, but busy all that time - see above
Gerry was never on his own except for the fleeting visit at about 9.05- 9.10

Gerry came back for 35 minutes and joined Kate so,
Kate and Gerry together = 1 hour 50 minutes, but Gerry busy at that time. - see above


AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The sad mantra about neglect
« Reply #224 on: August 03, 2013, 10:56:10 PM »
Good post, Benice.  The McCanns were guilty of human error - not neglect.
What kind of error isn't human, Chinagirl ?