Was 50 metres from the apartment 50 metres too far?

[Mr Gray]

Google 0552165158 Davel for far more honesty that the PR/legal peeps have.

you haven't supplied a cite

[pegasus]

LOL - what's LDLTHS, please?
I reserve judgement on the calibre of staff MW may have employed in the UK for a job abroad.

No idea what it stands for Misty. Your guess is as good as mine. Leicester Devon & London Table Hogging Society? 

[pegasus]

you haven't supplied a cite

Page 60 Davel I'm citing "23H50" and claiming that is 45 minutes after 23H05.
If you don't believe me try Processos Vol 10 page 2541 line 47.
As I said, this witness is honest , it's the PR peeps who mislead.
And BTW the parent-child distance was 100 metres rather than the usual 90 metres.

[mercury]

Page 60 Davel I'm citing "23H50" and claiming that is 45 minutes after 23H05.
If you don't believe me try Processos Vol 10 page 2541 line 47.
As I said, this witness is honest , it's the PR peeps who mislead.
And BTW the parent-child distance was 100 metres rather than the usual 90 metres.

The poster doesnt do links, quotes and reading the files much, they need help, lets give him it

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN_ARGUIDO.htm

Regarding this night she says that none of the children cried, she would have noticed as she was in the room. Regarding the fact that Madeleine on the next morning, Thursday, during breakfast said to both of them that she had been crying and that nobody had come to her room, she presumes that this crying must have been before she and Gerry returned to the apartment. When she asked Madeleine about this however, the child gave no importance to the matter. On this night they also checked on the children every half hour; however she thinks that 45 minutes had gone by from the time of the last check to when they arrived, as exceptionally they went to the Tapas bar. On this day she thinks that Gerry arrived at the apartment around 23:50 and she arrived 5 minutes afterwards. She went to sleep in Madeleine's room 15/20 minutes afterwards. Before this she spent a few minutes in her bed next to Gerry's.

[Miss Taken Identity]

The important point is: they could not see the children and didn't want to look in on them either- just that old trustworthy listening service they had.

[mercury]

The important point is: they could not see the children and didn't want to look in on them either- just that old trustworthy listening service they had.

Good question is why the dad at least as we havent a quote from mum , but a near enough insinuation, did he actually even bother going indoors to check if he never actually checked..

[pegasus]

Good question is why the dad at least as we havent a quote from mum , but a near enough insinuation, did he actually even bother going indoors to check if he never actually checked..

A good listening check could be done by just opening the sliding door a few cm, listening, then closing it again and back to the restaurant.

[mercury]

A good listening check could be done by just opening the sliding door a few cm, listening, then closing it again and back to the restaurant.

Yes but then you wouldnt be able to say i saw my daughter and thought how lucky i was....!

[G-Unit]

Yes but then you wouldnt be able to say i saw my daughter and thought how lucky i was....!

Which would mean the children weren't seen at all between 8.30pm and 10pm, unless you count Matthew seeing some humps in cots in that two windowed bedroom.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Which would mean the children weren't seen at all between 8.30pm and 10pm, unless you count Matthew seeing some humps in cots in that two windowed bedroom.

Indeed which opens up that 'window of opperchancity' <  love that word! lol

And of course one would think they would have been even more cautious, than prevous nights and physically checked the children after Maddies plea for answers to 'where were you last night'...

This could be the reason Gerry claimed he did a physical check (and added he felt someone was in the room), and why JT saw an abductor.... on the same street at the same time as other witneses who saw not her and not the abductor!
and why Kate found Maddie missing... that door being measured very carefully by so many- so that the time scale was narrowed.
 They didn't account for people checking and finding with all the claims of checking and being 'in the garden' that
they didn't bump into the bloody abductor! oh apart from JT  that is.

Kate gave a good description of saying 'yeah,yeah there was only a small window  of opportunity'  CLUCK CLUCK... that interview said a lot about their attitude.

[Brietta]

Indeed which opens up that 'window of opperchancity' <  love that word! lol

And of course one would think they would have been even more cautious, than prevous nights and physically checked the children after Maddies plea for answers to 'where were you last night'...

This could be the reason Gerry claimed he did a physical check (and added he felt someone was in the room), and why JT saw an abductor.... on the same street at the same time as other witneses who saw not her and not the abductor!
and why Kate found Maddie missing... that door being measured very carefully by so many- so that the time scale was narrowed.
 They didn't account for people checking and finding with all the claims of checking and being 'in the garden' that
they didn't bump into the bloody abductor! oh apart from JT  that is.

Kate gave a good description of saying 'yeah,yeah there was only a small window  of opportunity'  CLUCK CLUCK... that interview said a lot about their attitude.

It is my understanding that the notion an intruder may have already been in the apartment was a retrospective one.

If you know different, would you please supply a cite for Dr McCann saying at the time ... 
"(and added he felt someone was in the room)"

[Miss Taken Identity]

It is my understanding that the notion an intruder may have already been in the apartment was a retrospective one.

If you know different, would you please supply a cite for Dr McCann saying at the time ... 
"(and added he felt someone was in the room)"

Retrospective? ahh I see he added that bit on afterwards for effect. That always bothered me, mind you why say it restrospectivly if you 'felt it at the time'..hmmm no cite today- can't be bothered. You have already agreed he did say it.

[Eleanor]

Indeed which opens up that 'window of opperchancity' <  love that word! lol

And of course one would think they would have been even more cautious, than prevous nights and physically checked the children after Maddies plea for answers to 'where were you last night'...

This could be the reason Gerry claimed he did a physical check (and added he felt someone was in the room), and why JT saw an abductor.... on the same street at the same time as other witneses who saw not her and not the abductor!
and why Kate found Maddie missing... that door being measured very carefully by so many- so that the time scale was narrowed.
 They didn't account for people checking and finding with all the claims of checking and being 'in the garden' that
they didn't bump into the bloody abductor! oh apart from JT  that is.

Kate gave a good description of saying 'yeah,yeah there was only a small window  of opportunity'  CLUCK CLUCK... that interview said a lot about their attitude.

Gerry did not say that he felt someone was in the room.  This is a gross distortion of Facts.

[Brietta]

Retrospective? ahh I see he added that bit on afterwards for effect. That always bothered me, mind you why say it restrospectivly if you 'felt it at the time'..hmmm no cite today- can't be bothered. You have already agreed he did say it.

You are unable to provide a cite for the simple reason there is none.  What you have posted is therefore inaccurate and you should therefore amend your post to reflect your error.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Retrospective? ahh I see he added that bit on afterwards for effect. That always bothered me, mind you why say it restrospectivly if you 'felt it at the time'..hmmm no cite today- can't be bothered. You have already agreed he did say it.

Brietta quoted

"It is my understanding that the notion an intruder may have already been in the apartment was a retrospective one."

unquote


Did he or did he not say it  retrospectivly or not? where is your cite he said it retrospectivly?