Author Topic: PM query .  (Read 8164 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: PM query .
« Reply #30 on: October 25, 2013, 05:46:24 PM »
But what's to stop anyone saying you are a sh!t parent if that's their opinion?  It may not bother you, it may not bother the McCanns and I totally fail to see why it bothers a whole bunch of people enough to start carting abuse at those that don't agree with their more favourable opinions of the McCanns.  It's like that "leave Britney alone" weirdo all over again.

You seem totally unable to understand a simple point..it is not the MCCanns being shit parents per se that is the subject of the discussion but the fact that angelo claims that the [ censored word] do not post abusive posts. You shoulf of(sic)
noticed that

Offline Mr Gray

Re: PM query .
« Reply #31 on: October 25, 2013, 05:50:35 PM »
I carefully did not name you and the thread has been deleted.   I missed nothing by the way.   But you have started the abuse again - and people suggest only the "[ censored word]" are abusive.   Genocide starts when one group of people are treated as outside society by others, and all members of that group are treated as outsiders.

I shall not answer further and I hope admin will remove all these references as they did the previous thread.

A shame, as you at least had the decently to virtually apologise to me for some of what you said the other day

It isn't abuse its an opinion based on a lot of evidence. As you have brought up genocide.... I would also criticise the state of Israel for its appalling treatment of the Palestinians..is that racist too

Offline John

Re: PM query .
« Reply #32 on: October 25, 2013, 06:14:35 PM »
they may get the same message but you have just supported a poster being abusive towards the McCanns. that's up to you but for angelo to say that the [ censored word] are abusive and the pros aren't is ridiculous

He wasn't abusive Davel, he was stating an opinion based on the observation that their stupidity resulted in the loss of a child.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline imustpointout

Re: PM query .
« Reply #33 on: October 25, 2013, 06:15:22 PM »
I wonder if admin/mods have noticed the goading comments that are currently being posted on various threads.

C.Edwards

  • Guest
Re: PM query .
« Reply #34 on: October 25, 2013, 06:17:39 PM »
He wasn't abusive Davel, he was stating an opinion based on the observation that their stupidity resulted in the loss of a child.

This is absolutely correct.  If Angelo said, "it is a matter of fact that the McCanns are shit parents" then he would be stating a fact. As it is, he's saying something along the lines of (and apologies for paraphrasing Angelo) "despite the McCanns saying that what they did was well within the bounds of responsible parenting, I think they are shit parents as their actions have resulted in them losing a daughter."  If anyone thinks that is abusive, they need a new dictionary.

Offline Eleanor

Re: PM query .
« Reply #35 on: October 25, 2013, 06:20:05 PM »
I wonder if admin/mods have noticed the goading comments that are currently being posted on various threads.

I suspect that the likes of me are considered to be big enough and ugly enough to cope.  This has to be a compliment.
And if I get censured for replying in kind, then so be it.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: PM query .
« Reply #36 on: October 25, 2013, 06:20:50 PM »
He wasn't abusive Davel, he was stating an opinion based on the observation that their stupidity resulted in the loss of a child.

he was abusive in the criticism of the posters grammar

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: PM query .
« Reply #37 on: October 25, 2013, 06:22:42 PM »
This is absolutely correct.  If Angelo said, "it is a matter of fact that the McCanns are shit parents" then he would be stating a fact. As it is, he's saying something along the lines of (and apologies for paraphrasing Angelo) "despite the McCanns saying that what they did was well within the bounds of responsible parenting, I think they are shit parents as their actions have resulted in them losing a daughter."  If anyone thinks that is abusive, they need a new dictionary.

Freedom of thought under attack & freedom of speech on the other thread. Are the McCanns really that important?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Angelo222

Re: PM query .
« Reply #38 on: October 25, 2013, 06:24:39 PM »
You seem totally unable to understand a simple point..it is not the MCCanns being shit parents per se that is the subject of the discussion but the fact that angelo claims that the [ censored word] do not post abusive posts. You shoulf of(sic)
noticed that

I didn't say that Dave, try reading it again mate.

[ censored word] don't post about the McCanns the way pros do about Amaral.  No wonder they get reprimanded.

Do the [ censored word] make personal comments about what the McCanns wear, what they look like etc...  People in glass houses comes to mind.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Jazzy

Re: PM query .
« Reply #39 on: October 25, 2013, 06:38:35 PM »
I didn't say that Dave, try reading it again mate.

Actually Angelo I had a conversation with an "anti" on here recently, she took great delight in posting photographs of the "overjoyed" Mccanns days after their child's loss.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: PM query .
« Reply #40 on: October 25, 2013, 07:18:37 PM »
This is absolutely correct.  If Angelo said, "it is a matter of fact that the McCanns are shit parents" then he would be stating a fact. As it is, he's saying something along the lines of (and apologies for paraphrasing Angelo) "despite the McCanns saying that what they did was well within the bounds of responsible parenting, I think they are shit parents as their actions have resulted in them losing a daughter."  If anyone thinks that is abusive, they need a new dictionary.

he didn't say that