The Leonor Cipriano case reviewed... AGAIN!

[Mr Gray]

You dont know that and have no evidence to support that.....

It was proved in court

[Redblossom]

It was proved in court

It was proved in court that he covered up torture? Oh my, really? Do link the text....

[carlymichelle]

It was proved in court that he covered up torture? Oh my, really? Do link the text....

i dont know how you put up with answering davel best  thing i ever did was  ignore......... they only see what they want too

[Mr Gray]

It was proved in court that he covered up torture? Oh my, really? Do link the text....

What do you think he got his conviction to then...speeding

[Mr Gray]

i dont know how you put up with answering davel best  thing i ever did was  ignore......... they only see what they want too

Are you a grown up carly

[Redblossom]

What do you think he got his conviction to then...speeding

it was not for covering up torture.....you stated it, up to you to scurry off now and find the proof.....

[Mr Gray]

it was not for covering up torture.....you stated it, up to you to scurry off now and find the proof.....

Yes it was

[Redblossom]

Yes it was

i know you said it was, you dont need to repeat it, just show the proof....after all you want facts dont you, and not myths,  show us them.....that the court judged amaral was guilt of covering up torture....

[Mr Gray]

i know you said it was, you dont need to repeat it, just show the proof....after all you want facts dont you, and not myths,  show us them.....that the courf judged amaral was guilt of covering up torture....

Its one of the basic facts...have a look back at the July..august posts...you will find it there...if not may or June...take your time

[Redblossom]

Its one of the basic facts...have a look back at the July..august posts...you will find it there...if not may or June...take your time

nope, nowhere.........did you actually read the court  documents? Obviously  not

leave yu to ferret them out..the proper ones....and not some wayside interpretation....

Nite nite now

[Mr Gray]

nope, nowhere.........

So what was he convicted for...

[Redblossom]

So what was he convicted for...

You made  the allegation up to you to prove it....not pass the buck...bye now

[Mr Gray]

You made  the allegation up to you to prove it....not pass the buck...bye now

Its not a matter of passing the buck...the judgement was in Portuguese...I've given my interpretation.. I've seen the judgement described as perjury...what's your interpretation

[Mr Gray]

What's happened to Stephen..has he gone to fix his keyboard.  I think he was having problems with the caps lock key

[AnneGuedes]

You dont know that and have no evidence to support that.....he signed off a report about  her getting injuries after attempting to throw herself off the stairs.......thats all we know...he wasnt there...he trusted his officers... If yu know more do tell...everyone would like to know what happened, doesnt help if yu just make stuff up or dont back up any claims, ta

I wonder which proof the MP had that Mrs Cipriano had been assaulted on the PJ premisses.
The only thing that should be absolutely required would be to identify the people who assaulted her there. Who had something to gain with it ?