Was this written in a monotone?
Isnt this what the McCanns used to excuse the dogs findings and spouted on about Zapata and his trail etc the dogs evidence couldnt be used?
Zapata, 68, was charged with first-degree murder last year after the dogs indicated they sniffed human remains in a small basement "crawl space" at the former family home in Madison and other properties linked to him.
But Dane County Judge Patrick Fiedler ruled last month that the evidence that led to the charge could not be put before the jury.
He said the dogs were too unreliable in detecting the odour of remains and noted that no remains were actually found.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Oh yeh and what happened in that case then....
THE DOGS SCORED A HOME RUN, they were right all along as he confessed in 2008 to killing her and carrying her body around to different hiding places.
Good doggy..... 
Note to self. Not one pro McCann answered this post wonder why?
Hummmm >@@(*&) oh I can guess because the dog was CORRECT even without a body the doggy told his master he could smell a dead body.
The McCanns used the Zapata case to prove a point about how unreliable the dogs were, but it sadly backfired as the guy eventually confessed to a lesser charge.
He had been carrying his dead wives body around.
Its funny how no one wants to know that lol....
DOGGIES 2 ....... MCCANNS 0 