Author Topic: Prosecution evidence?  (Read 62162 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #105 on: November 18, 2013, 10:33:10 PM »
Me too

And me.  I want Leonor Cipriano to know that she hasn't been forgotten.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #106 on: November 18, 2013, 10:38:32 PM »
So NO ONE here has provided any evidence thatleonor didnt write that 2009 letter...hmmmm....pot kettle black vis a vis evidence

Offline Eleanor

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #107 on: November 18, 2013, 10:44:01 PM »
So NO ONE here has provided any evidence thatleonor didnt write that 2009 letter...hmmmm....pot kettle black vis a vis evidence

And you haven't proved that she did.  But thanks for the link.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #108 on: November 18, 2013, 10:46:35 PM »
And you haven't proved that she did.  But thanks for the link.

I dont have to prove anything.....the accuser ie YOU has to prove its a fake, cheers

Offline Eleanor

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #109 on: November 18, 2013, 10:59:20 PM »
I dont have to prove anything.....the accuser ie YOU has to prove its a fake, cheers

Not so, Sweetie.  You produced the link as gospel when it clearly isn't.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #110 on: November 18, 2013, 11:07:58 PM »
Not so, Sweetie.  You produced the link as gospel when it clearly isn't.

Its evidence, if you say its a fake its your job to prove so.....simples


gosh  so much supporting murderers is getting pretty vile now...and all because...to make the mccanns white,, fail......
 8((()*/


Offline Eleanor

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #111 on: November 18, 2013, 11:13:22 PM »
Its evidence, if you say its a fake its your job to prove so.....simples


gosh  so much supporting murderers is getting pretty vile now...and all because...to make the mccanns white,, fail......
 8((()*/

You can always leave.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #112 on: November 18, 2013, 11:31:06 PM »
You can always leave.

You could even attempt to answer questions withanswers.....something youhave proved is too hard for you as youve evaded every single one....oh well.......says it all...youre attempts atbullying and intimidation andevasion  equal 0/10 so far,no surprise



 8)--))

Leave? leave where? Fantasist
« Last Edit: November 18, 2013, 11:33:43 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Anna

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #113 on: November 18, 2013, 11:44:45 PM »
The 8 page statement It seems the Blogger's name is Astro He lives in Portomao and he has an email Which is the easiest way to find out if what he posted was authentic or not, but I cant make a connection. It
does look pretty real though and I have read it elsewhere which I had to translate. It is a statement and not a cconfession, I believe
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline sadie

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #114 on: November 19, 2013, 08:13:09 PM »
The 8 page statement It seems the Blogger's name is Astro He lives in Portomao and he has an email Which is the easiest way to find out if what he posted was authentic or not, but I cant make a connection. It
does look pretty real though and I have read it elsewhere which I had to translate. It is a statement and not a cconfession, I believe

I think Astro is considered an avid anti.  I have never met him on a forum, but heard of him.

I, personally, would scrutinize everything he said.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #115 on: November 19, 2013, 08:24:33 PM »
Its evidence, if you say its a fake its your job to prove so.....simples


gosh  so much supporting murderers is getting pretty vile now...and all because...to make the mccanns white,, fail......
 8((()*/

 doesn't matter whether its real or fake...perhaps she did write it..

she tried telling the truth..where did that get her ..beaten to a pulp and a  20 yr prison sentence...perhaps she would lie to try and get out of prison..I would  and I wouldn't blame her

Offline j.rob

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #116 on: January 28, 2014, 04:19:19 PM »
im asking where the information comes from...yours as well while we are at it...the more I look at this case the more I think they are innocent

I see nothing at all to support your extraordinary view. Neither did the justice system. The pair are/were the most horrible sounding people. The child was treated appalllingly.

Of course criminals who want to get away with murder are going to lie and try to frame other people That's what criminals do.

 "Guilhermino da Encarnação: "This is extremely difficult because, in 30 years of criminal investigation, I've never seen the confession of such a serious crime without the arguidos saying they were tortured, attacked or raped so that this, for us police officers, and I tell you, unfortunately, it has become the norm, natural. Therefore I don't give it a lot of credence."

Kate McCann chose to bring up this case in her book, in order to cast doubt on Amaral, She should have looked a bit more closely at the behaviour of the murdered child's mother and the way this child was neglected.

It says a great deal about the McCann's lack of integrity, among other things, that they tried to use this case as a way of discrediting Amaral. A great deal.

There is not a single thing I have read about the case that leads me to a conclusion that there has been a miscarriage of justice.


Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #117 on: January 28, 2014, 04:37:57 PM »
I see nothing at all to support your extraordinary view. Neither did the justice system. The pair are/were the most horrible sounding people. The child was treated appalllingly.

Of course criminals who want to get away with murder are going to lie and try to frame other people That's what criminals do.

 "Guilhermino da Encarnação: "This is extremely difficult because, in 30 years of criminal investigation, I've never seen the confession of such a serious crime without the arguidos saying they were tortured, attacked or raped so that this, for us police officers, and I tell you, unfortunately, it has become the norm, natural. Therefore I don't give it a lot of credence."

Kate McCann chose to bring up this case in her book, in order to cast doubt on Amaral, She should have looked a bit more closely at the behaviour of the murdered child's mother and the way this child was neglected.

It says a great deal about the McCann's lack of integrity, among other things, that they tried to use this case as a way of discrediting Amaral. A great deal.

There is not a single thing I have read about the case that leads me to a conclusion that there has been a miscarriage of justice.

They should have got longer sentences, that is the only miscarriage of justice here.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Carana

Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #118 on: January 28, 2014, 07:38:19 PM »
They should have got longer sentences, that is the only miscarriage of justice here.

What is your opinion based on? I had assumed that they were guilty as well until I started looking at the actual evidence... And discovered there was nothing material of any significance.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Prosecution evidence?
« Reply #119 on: January 28, 2014, 07:41:11 PM »
They should have got longer sentences, that is the only miscarriage of justice here.

The mother got a longer sentence for perjury.....small mercies