Author Topic: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits  (Read 98987 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #255 on: December 22, 2013, 11:06:27 PM »
Why is it so important to you to try and criminalise The Mccanns?  There has to be a reason.
Why is it so important to you to try and accuse people of criminalising the McCanns ?
There has to be a reason.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #256 on: December 22, 2013, 11:09:05 PM »
Because they seem to have no theories of their own, but just try and discredit, in a manner somewhat similar to a defence lawyer, the evidence that exists which is not favourable to the McCanns. Most people on here understand that the evidence that exist either way would not stand up in a court of law and most want to get to the truth of what happened.
Yes and nothing more.
The rest belongs to justice.

Offline sadie

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #257 on: December 22, 2013, 11:09:47 PM »
I limited myself to read what Ms Tanner had to say. She didn't justify the "blank face" with a turned away head.
So if she saw the face clearly why do you think she didn't put a face on it Anne?

And btw, turned away doesn't necessarily mean deliberately turned away.  Could be just far enough away to not give a good enough view. 

Better not to have a face at all, than the wrong face, doncha think?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #258 on: December 22, 2013, 11:12:12 PM »
The front door is a burglars dream. 
Especially if, being not locked, it's easy to open it. This is why your abductor didn't lift the shutters.

Offline sadie

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #259 on: December 22, 2013, 11:15:05 PM »
Because they seem to have no theories of their own, but just try and discredit, in a manner somewhat similar to a defence lawyer, the evidence that exists which is not favourable to the McCanns. Most people on here understand that the evidence that exist either way would not stand up in a court of law and most want to get to the truth of what happened.

They both understand the dogs readings which many of us, including Amaral did not.  They keep re-iterating the facts.  They have to do that because so many posters do NOT understand what the dogs reactions meant ... and these people, probably unknowingly, are promoting lies.

We need people like debunker, Ferryman and Davel to put the lies right.  Several other posters fully understand the dogs reactions, but few if any, on the anti side, do it seems.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #260 on: December 22, 2013, 11:15:59 PM »
So if she saw the face clearly why do you think she didn't put a face on it Anne?

And btw, turned away doesn't necessarily mean deliberately turned away.  Could be just far enough away to not give a good enough view. 

Better not to have a face at all, than the wrong face, doncha think?
Better have an average face than a blank one that arouses suspicion. What did Jane see that made her suppress the face, the most singular part of a person ?


AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #262 on: December 22, 2013, 11:18:04 PM »

We need people like debunker, Ferryman and Davel to put the lies right.
@)(++(*

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #263 on: December 22, 2013, 11:22:53 PM »
They both understand the dogs readings which many of us, including Amaral did not.  They keep re-iterating the facts.  They have to do that because so many posters do NOT understand what the dogs reactions meant ... and these people, probably unknowingly, are promoting lies.

We need people like debunker, Ferryman and Davel to put the lies right.  Several other posters fully understand the dogs reactions, but few if any, on the anti side, do it seems.

We really can't have members promoting myths & lies.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2866.0

To allow such things would be a gross travesty of justice.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline sadie

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #264 on: December 22, 2013, 11:29:51 PM »
Why didn't Kate shout from the apartment to the tapas, Sadie?

You tried to convince us Madeleine could have done. Why didn't Kate?
We dont know, but Gerry is her rock.  No doubt about that.  She ran to him and it is only about 75 metres away.
World record time for 100 metres, women, is under 11 seconds  So at the same rate 150 metres could be run in under  17 seconds.  Kate is no slouch, and she had half that distance at about 75 metres, so lets assume that she ran the 75 metres in the time for 150 metres.

She yelled them before she got there, but we will ignore that

So under 17 seconds to her rock and all her friends ... and she knew they would hear her clearly if she went.

Most likely her gut reaction was to get Gerry and I doubt she lucidly thought this out liike I have suggested.  However, the facts stand that she probably ran it in 15 -17 seconds.


Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #266 on: December 22, 2013, 11:34:00 PM »
We dont know, but Gerry is her rock.  No doubt about that.  She ran to him and it is only about 75 metres away.
World record time for 100 metres, women, is under 11 seconds  So at the same rate 150 metres could be run in under  17 seconds.  Kate is no slouch, and she had half that distance at about 75 metres, so lets assume that she ran the 75 metres in the time for 159 metres.

She yelled them before she got there, but we will ignore that

So under 17 seconds to her rock and all her friends ... and she knew they would hear her clearly if she went.

Most likely her gut reaction was to get Gerry and I doubt she lucidly thought this out liike I have suggested.  However, the facts stand that she probably ran it in 15 -17 seconds.

But unfortunately she just couldn't quite muster the superhuman strength required to pick up the phone & call the police.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline sadie

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #267 on: December 22, 2013, 11:35:06 PM »
We really can't have members promoting myths & lies.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2866.0

To allow such things would be a gross travesty of justice.
Do you object to Ferryman and Davel presenting facts/

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #268 on: December 22, 2013, 11:35:31 PM »
We dont know, but Gerry is her rock.  No doubt about that.  She ran to him and it is only about 75 metres away.
World record time for 100 metres, women, is under 11 seconds  So at the same rate 150 metres could be run in under  17 seconds.  Kate is no slouch, and she had half that distance at about 75 metres, so lets assume that she ran the 75 metres in the time for 150 metres.

She yelled them before she got there, but we will ignore that

So under 17 seconds to her rock and all her friends ... and she knew they would hear her clearly if she went.

Most likely her gut reaction was to get Gerry and I doubt she lucidly thought this out liike I have suggested.  However, the facts stand that she probably ran it in 15 -17 seconds.

And when they get back, who sees the window open?

Offline sadie

Re: The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits
« Reply #269 on: December 22, 2013, 11:47:49 PM »
Who is a proven liar ! How many different personas has it appeared as and how many professions has it claimed to be thus far ?

OP you are hardening and changing the meaning of what I said.  That is a kind of falsification. 
Post 267 sadie
Quote
They both understand the dogs readings which many of us, including Amaral did not.  They keep re-iterating the facts.  They have to do that because so many posters do NOT understand what the dogs reactions meant ... and these people, probably unknowingly, are promoting lies.

Many people on here still seem not to understand the meanings and non meanings of the doigs reactions.