Author Topic: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?  (Read 155585 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #345 on: April 02, 2014, 07:47:17 PM »
Be interesting to know if Aoife did one as she saw the man passing close by and by the street light so possibly got  a better look and she was sober.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2014, 07:53:24 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #346 on: April 02, 2014, 08:06:36 PM »
Be interesting to know if Aoife did one as she saw the man passing close by and by the street light so possibly got  a better look and she was sober.
Also observant was the boy who was the only one in the group who remembered the child's bare feet and the man's jacket/coat, so he is another possibility re efit source JIMO.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #347 on: April 02, 2014, 08:12:00 PM »
Also observant was the boy who was the only one in the group who remembered the child's bare feet and the man's jacket/coat, so he is another possibility re efit source JIMO.

Agreed. It would be interesting to know what new information SY have got from all 9 in regards to the sighting.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline John

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #348 on: April 02, 2014, 08:48:11 PM »
I would love to hear what the Smiths have to say about these e-fits.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #349 on: April 02, 2014, 08:51:58 PM »
I would love to hear what the Smiths have to say about these e-fits.

Maybe we will one day. Saying that though, one of the things that makes them so credible is their complete refusal to get caught up in the media circus.


Estuarine

  • Guest
Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #350 on: April 02, 2014, 09:00:33 PM »
Agreed. It would be interesting to know what new information SY have got from all 9 in regards to the sighting.

I wonder if DCI Redwood is an ace rummy player? All of sudden all cards down and he yells "gin" and everyone else is left saying what?.

Offline pegasus

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #351 on: April 02, 2014, 11:17:28 PM »
An innocentman was found and this caused a 'revelation'. Could that happen a second time?
« Last Edit: April 02, 2014, 11:20:08 PM by pegasus »

Offline sadie

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #352 on: April 02, 2014, 11:25:14 PM »
I would love to hear what the Smiths have to say about these e-fits.
Why dont you drive over and have a chat with them, John?

Just a suggestion.

Offline pegasus

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #353 on: April 03, 2014, 12:06:16 AM »
If an innocent smithman is found (both sightings discounted) where would that leave the timeline?

Offline sadie

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #354 on: April 03, 2014, 10:19:32 AM »
  For the poster claiming that Tannerman has been bypassed but not ruled out, that is what the OFM site would have the public believe, as to wave bye bye to Tannerman  AS SY HAVE MOST CERTAINLY DONE] is to ge themselves into all sorts of problems.

 Read the timelines. Read the witness statements and the rogatories........esp Gerry McCann words re MO and the were they weren't they closed shutters.

 SY site and Redwood could not be clearer. Tannerman is in the bin.
I have no contact with the Official Find Madeleine site.  The fact that Tannerman has not been completely ruled out has nothing to do with them as far as I am concerned.

Jane Tanner saw a man carrying a little girl  at about 9.15 ish.  She is clear that he walked across her along the top street Rua A S, coming from west to east, and close by.   I believe her completely.  Seems there were two men carrying a child that evening.

You rule that possibility out.  Who are you to be so authoritive?  Were you there for the 45 minutes being considered?

I believe that there was a second man.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #355 on: April 03, 2014, 10:33:59 AM »
I have no contact with the Official Find Madeleine site.  The fact that Tannerman has not been completely ruled out has nothing to do with them as far as I am concerned.

Jane Tanner saw a man carrying a little girl  at about 9.15 ish.  She is clear that he walked across her along the top street Rua A S, coming from west to east, and close by.   I believe her completely.  Seems there were two men carrying a child that evening.

You rule that possibility out.  Who are you to be so authoritive?  Were you there for the 45 minutes being considered?

I believe that there was a second man.

Scotland Yard don't seem to be considering that and are concentrating on Smithman.

Offline jassi

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #356 on: April 03, 2014, 10:49:46 AM »
Along with umpteen burglars, sex-offenders and a former junkie alas now RIP.  You couldn't make it up could you?

Desperate, isn't it. Hopefully they will sort it out before they manage to spend another 6 million.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #357 on: April 03, 2014, 11:16:28 AM »
They have to investigate all possibilities because when/if they make arrests critics will say, well you never checked out tom, dick and harry and they can respond by saying we investigated all leads and these are the ones that did it  8((()*/
« Last Edit: April 03, 2014, 11:18:35 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline sadie

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #358 on: April 03, 2014, 11:33:07 AM »
They have to investigate all possibilities because when/if they make arrests critics will say, well you never checked out tom, dick and harry and they can respond by saying we investigated all leads and these are the ones that did it  8((()*/

Good thinking pathfinder. 

Also, if the perp is as influential, clever and slippery as i think he is, hopefully they will have got rid of all the other possibilities that he could have presented ... and just be able to hone in on him

Offline valeria

Re: Was Mr Smiths claim just pie in the sky after all?
« Reply #359 on: April 03, 2014, 11:46:14 AM »
on metropolitan police page there is an PDL interactive map with Taner's sighting. when you click on it  although initially there is an announcement that they may have identify this man, immediately after you watch the video with the represedation of the sighting and finally there is an appeal for informations. this means that tanerman has not ruled out completely. Or i get it wrong?