Author Topic: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?  (Read 380575 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1290 on: September 23, 2015, 03:39:42 PM »
Reposted for at least the fifth time!


These issues have already been addressed on at least three occasions so asking the same question again will be deemed to be spam.

Mr Grime was employed by SYP when he was tasked to Portugal.  He retired in August 2007 and was not employed by the police when he wrote his Report thus the non official headed notepaper.  At that point he was correctly referred to as the trainer/owner of the dogs having been allowed to retain them on his retirement.

What uniform Mr Grime wore in Portugal was a matter for him.  He was not obliged to wear any uniform and protective clothing was a matter entirely for him at his discretion.

Hopefully at some point in the near future (legal restraints permitting) he will be able to reply to specific questions on his deployment in Praia da Luz.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1291 on: September 23, 2015, 03:43:42 PM »
Reposted for at least the fifth time!
What legal restraints currently prevent Grime from discussing the case now - is he actively involved in the investigation still?  And, why did he not take the opportunity to shed more light on his dogs' alerts when the case was closed all those years ago?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1292 on: September 23, 2015, 03:46:34 PM »
Reposted for at least the fifth time!

Aside from that Grime retired in August 2007 (true!) the rest is as untrue when you wrote it as it is today.

One simple, salient, fact. 

SYP would not have deployed two dogs and one handler.

Offline John

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1293 on: September 23, 2015, 04:01:42 PM »
Aside from that Grime retired in August 2007 (true!) the rest is as untrue when you wrote it as it is today.

One simple, salient, fact. 

SYP would not have deployed two dogs and one handler.

Off course they would, my own force did it often.  Martin was handler to both dogs, you cannot expect another officer to work with a dog he is unfamiliar with.   Please can we have no more of these spurious claims.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1294 on: September 23, 2015, 04:03:27 PM »
What legal restraints currently prevent Grime from discussing the case now - is he actively involved in the investigation still?  And, why did he not take the opportunity to shed more light on his dogs' alerts when the case was closed all those years ago?

He has told us that he cannot answer questions specific to his deployment in Praia da Luz in case there is a trial at some future date.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1295 on: September 23, 2015, 04:04:28 PM »
Off course they would, my own force did it often.  Martin was handler to both dogs, you cannot expect another officer to work with a dog he is unfamiliar with.   Please can we have no more of these spurious claims.

Keela's handler was John Ellis.

Offline John

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1296 on: September 23, 2015, 04:05:33 PM »
Keela's handler was John Ellis.

Yet Keela stayed with Martin after PdL.  Sending two canine officers to Portugal was not cost effective.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1297 on: September 23, 2015, 04:37:36 PM »
He has told us that he cannot answer questions specific to his deployment in Praia da Luz in case there is a trial at some future date.
In effect he is silenced forever then.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1298 on: September 23, 2015, 05:01:35 PM »
In effect he is silenced forever then.

So it's no comment to any questions re the alerts in PDL

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1299 on: September 23, 2015, 05:45:19 PM »
So it's no comment to any questions re the alerts in PDL

I wouldn't hold your breath for him answering any of your questions 8(0(*

Offline Brietta

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1300 on: September 23, 2015, 05:52:30 PM »
Reposted for at least the fifth time!

You've lost me there, John.

Are you saying that Operation HAVEN are wrong in giving Martin Grime's retirement date as July 2007?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Carana

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1301 on: September 23, 2015, 06:27:22 PM »
He has told us that he cannot answer questions specific to his deployment in Praia da Luz in case there is a trial at some future date.

What was the point of the questions thread, then?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1302 on: September 23, 2015, 06:37:37 PM »
I wouldn't hold your breath for him answering any of your questions 8(0(*

he's already answered them all

Offline John

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1303 on: September 23, 2015, 06:48:31 PM »
What was the point of the questions thread, then?

The questions were passed to him and he acknowledged that they were excellent but he is constrained by the possibility of a future trial.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2015, 12:52:39 AM by Admin »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Carana

Re: Are Victim Detection and Forensic Evidence Search Dogs reliable?
« Reply #1304 on: September 23, 2015, 07:21:02 PM »
The questions were passed to him and he acknowledged that they were excellent but he is constrained by the possibility of a future trial.

I thought he could answer general questions about his dogs and dog handling, but wasn't supposed to talk about the details of any specific case?

Two general questions:

Did Eddie's training parameters extend to a) decomposing sex fluids and b) the residual scent of blood or not?