The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.

[Mr Gray]

Bearing in mind the unwillingness of some of the group to participate in a reconstruction, I have never understood why, with all the technology that police have available, the data from all the various statements hasn't been put into a computer and  a  virtual simulation of the activities of that night created. The discrepancies would be glaringly obvious and could then be further probed.

It seems sy have the technology do do this so they probably have......hence the mccanns are not suspects

[stephen25000]

John
You must have noticed how posters from your side of the fence always drown out all my more profound posts by flooding the thread with silly little irrelevances.

They delibetaely hide them with trivia.,

What is that drowning out  of my posts called ?





As long as this continues, I have no option but to repost my posts.  I wouldn't chose to.

It is totally unfair.  Of course I have to repost .. or NOT have a voice

How old are you ? >@@(*&)

[Albertini]

The Mccanns pressed the PJ for a reconstruction at the time of the abduction.

Their request was refused.  I wonder why?  >@@(*&)




BTW, Albertini, you are innacurate.  The Mccanns have NEVER refused to go back.  PLease get your facts straight.

Sadie, you are wrong again. Read my wording and then look at this quote from Clarence Mitchell in the People on Sunday 6th April 2008 under an article written by Tom Carlin:

"The McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: "If they returned now to Portugal it would be a distraction and would put pressure on police.
 
Their lawyers would block it anyway.
 
But once their arguido status has been lifted, they will feel differently."

[sadie]

Sadie, you are wrong again. Read my wording and then look at this quote from Clarence Mitchell in the People on Sunday 6th April 2008 under an article written by Tom Carlin:

They, I repeat THEY, were prepared to go.  Thank God they didn't.   


Very wise Lawyer.... maybe he thought they were about to be entrapped?  Dunno, but I have an uneasy feeling.


Very wise Lawyer.  But they were prepared to go.

[Wonderfulspam]

They, I repeat THEY, were prepared to go.  Thank God they didn't.   


Very wise Lawyer.... maybe he thought they were about to be entrapped?  Dunno, but I have an uneasy feeling.


Very wise Lawyer.  But they were prepared to go.

But alas, they prevented the investigation from continuing &, in effect ,abandoned a missing toddler to her fate.

A terrible act of cowardice on their part.

[The Singularity]

But alas, they prevented the investigation from continuing &, in effect ,abandoned a missing toddler to her fate.

A terrible act of cowardice on their part.

Can you please explain how they:

1) prevented the investigation from continuing considering the investigation is active now
2) abandoned a toddler to her fate
3) was an act of cowardice?

Thank you

[Carana]

Sadie, you are wrong again. Read my wording and then look at this quote from Clarence Mitchell in the People on Sunday 6th April 2008 under an article written by Tom Carlin:

139 Letter from R. Alves regarding K. McCann's willingness to participate in the reconstruction
09 01 Apensos IX Vol I Page 139
 o_apensoIX_vol_1_Page_139
 


Public Ministry of Portimao
Case Section
Case 201/07 GALGS


Dear Sir
Public prosecutor


Kate Marie Healy arguida in the case referred to above, having been notified (page 3947) expresses her availability to participate in the reconstruction of the events on the second of the dates suggested, in other words on the 15 and 16th of next May. Her husband, Gerry McCann has also already expressed his availability.

Rogerio Alves
Lawyer

(Sent by email)

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RE_ENACTMENT.htm

[Wonderfulspam]

Can you please explain how they:

1) prevented the investigation from continuing considering the investigation is active now
2) abandoned a toddler to her fate
3) was an act of cowardice?

Thank you

Ok

1)
If they had gone back, taken part in a reconstitution, cooperated fully & thus, demonstrated their innocence, then the investigation could have continued 7 years ago when, supposedly, there would have been more chance of finding the child alive, even though I reckon she was already brown bread, but that's beside the point.

2) Duh!

3)They pussied out.

[Carana]

Speaking to The Portugal News in early 2009, Gerry McCann stressed “that there is no evidence that Madeleine is dead and there is no evidence to suggest that Kate and I were involved in any theories.”
Gerry McCann also insisted they would have been legally compelled to be available for a reconstruction due to their status as arguidos, even the motives of Portuguese police were questionable.
“Don’t get me wrong, we had major concerns as to why the reconstruction was being done”, arguing that “the police reconstruction was not aimed at finding Madeleine, but rather to look for inconsistencies. There were 12 or 15 people involved and it is inevitable there would be inconsistencies.”
http://theportugalnews.com/news/closing-arguments-in-amaral-libel-case-set-for-january/30084

[Wonderfulspam]

ITV 25th May 2007

Q: "And you've said that you won't go home either but at some point you may have to go home. Whe... At what point do you decide: 'Our lives must continue, we've got two other children, we have to get on?"
 
KM: "I mean, at this... at this moment in time I cannot think about going home without Madeleine, errr... and we certainly have no plans at all to go home with Madeleine... without Madeleine."

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id260.html




'On the flight to Berlin, Gerry wearily admitted the couple's campaign to find Madeleine could last years.

They refuse to leave Praia da Luz while their precious daughter is still missing.

Asked how long they might stay there, he said: "Well, our kids don't start school for three years."'

- Daily Mirror, 07 June 2007

[jassi]

Speaking to The Portugal News in early 2009, Gerry McCann stressed “that there is no evidence that Madeleine is dead and there is no evidence to suggest that Kate and I were involved in any theories.”
Gerry McCann also insisted they would have been legally compelled to be available for a reconstruction due to their status as arguidos, even the motives of Portuguese police were questionable.
“Don’t get me wrong, we had major concerns as to why the reconstruction was being done”, arguing that “the police reconstruction was not aimed at finding Madeleine, but rather to look for inconsistencies. There were 12 or 15 people involved and it is inevitable there would be inconsistencies.”
http://theportugalnews.com/news/closing-arguments-in-amaral-libel-case-set-for-january/30084

That's no reason not to go ahead with the reconstruction.
The McCanns were happy to say they were willing to go back, confident that it would not go ahead because some of these friends would refuse to take part, as indeed  they did.

[Albertini]

They, I repeat THEY, were prepared to go.  Thank God they didn't.   


Very wise Lawyer.... maybe he thought they were about to be entrapped?  Dunno, but I have an uneasy feeling.


Very wise Lawyer.  But they were prepared to go.

Well, their official spokesman said on the record in April 2008, that their lawyers would block them going back and lo and behold they did not go back.

They had been blocked from doing so according to their spokesman. Those are an on the record quotes.

And can you show me where the McCann's had offered to come back for a reconstruction months before with quotes please.

[jassi]

Well, their official spokesman said on the record in April 2008, that their lawyers would block them going back and lo and behold they did not go back.

They had been blocked from doing so according to their spokesman. Those are an on the record quotes.

And can you show me where the McCann's had offered to come back for a reconstruction months before with quotes please.

I didn't realise that lawyers had such power. I thought their role was to advise their clients

[Mr Gray]

Well, their official spokesman said on the record in April 2008, that their lawyers would block them going back and lo and behold they did not go back.

They had been blocked from doing so according to their spokesman. Those are an on the record quotes.

And can you show me where the McCann's had offered to come back for a reconstruction months before with quotes please.

I'M sure they would have done anything to avoid going back and who can blame them...hence the employment of the extradition lawyers...

[Carana]

Well, their official spokesman said on the record in April 2008, that their lawyers would block them going back and lo and behold they did not go back.

They had been blocked from doing so according to their spokesman. Those are an on the record quotes.

And can you show me where the McCann's had offered to come back for a reconstruction months before with quotes please.

Of any help?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=3629.msg140076#msg140076