The tapas group and the 'reconstitution' that was never to take place.

[icabodcrane]

Funny how Amaral is known to have refused, due to some bollox about publicity and closing the air space over Praia de Luz.
Or is that a myth as well?

Show the evidence  that the McCanns  'offered'  to take part in a reconstruction  ...  ever 


Even Kate does not make that claim in her book

[ferryman]

Show the evidence  that the McCanns  'offered'  to take part in a reconstruction  ...  ever 


Even Kate does not make that claim in her book

Do understand the difference between reconstruction and reconstitution.

They are quite different.

The first can advance a criminal investigation.

The second is an exercise in futility ...

[stephen25000]

Show the evidence  that the McCanns  'offered'  to take part in a reconstruction  ...  ever 


Even Kate does not make that claim in her book

The mccanns and their devoted mccbieberettes are quite fond of accusing others of myths. However, where do they really originate I wonder.

[Wonderfulspam]

What's wrong with Crimewatch?

My father always used to describe television as 'The idiots lantern'


Which is why he lost his job as director general of the bbc.

[stephen25000]

Same goes for the Amaralites. Too much heat, not enough light on either side.

There has been a lot of hot air in this case.

[Cariad]

Wrong.  There were no English speaking actors in Portugal during the first couple of weeks.  Only most of people who were actually involved.

So can you provide some evidence of this much mentioned request to take part in a reconstrution then please? I have only ever seen it stated by you and Sadie.

[Eleanor]

So can you provide some evidence of this much mentioned request to take part in a reconstrution then please? I have only ever seen it stated by you and Sadie.

No, sorry, I don't do links.  Everyone knows that.  But since I am not much fussed about what you think, and I don't suppose that The McCanns are either, I can only suggest that you report me.

[Cariad]

Someone is going to produce proof of this eventually.  In which case I shall expect your apology.  To The McCanns, that is.

As you previously stated (and I completely agree with) the Mccanns couldn't give a toss about what I think or say, so I don't think an apology will be necessary.

If there is proof, why don't you produce it?

[Eleanor]

As you previously stated (and I completely agree with) the Mccanns couldn't give a toss about what I think or say, so I don't think an apology will be necessary.

If there is proof, why don't you produce it?

A.  I don't know where to look amongst the welter of information,
and
B.  The last time I produced a very credible Link it nearly caused a Civil War.  Actually, an Uncivil War.

[Wonderfulspam]

A.  I don't know where to look amongst the welter of information,
and
B.  The last time I produced a very credible Link it nearly caused a Civil War.  Actually, an Uncivil War.

What's civil about war anyway....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWaqtG9eRgA

[Albertini]

Do understand the difference between reconstruction and reconstitution.

They are quite different.

The first can advance a criminal investigation.

The second is an exercise in futility ...

So why, pray tell, is asking a witness to demonstrate what they claimed happened in an oral statement to see whether it physically could be possible, an excercise in futility?

Seems eminently sensible to me to test out the veracity of a witnesses claim.

Or is it that it's only futile because it sought to test the veracity of the McCann's and their friends?

[Eleanor]

What's civil about war anyway....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWaqtG9eRgA

There was nothing civil about that particular war either.

[Albertini]

Same goes for the Amaralites. Too much heat, not enough light on either side.

Who or what the hell is an "Amaralite"?

Is this an extension of the childish "goodies" and "baddies" mindset that so preoccupies the average McCann supporter?

Truly bizzare.

[Albertini]

No, sorry, I don't do links.  Everyone knows that.  But since I am not much fussed about what you think, and I don't suppose that The McCanns are either, I can only suggest that you report me.

Deary me what an utterly unhelpful, condescending and downright arrogant post.
 
It rather begs the question why you even bother posting on here if this is what you believe to be an acceptable post.

[Mr Gray]

So why, pray tell, is asking a witness to demonstrate what they claimed happened in an oral statement to see whether it physically could be possible, an excercise in futility?

Seems eminently sensible to me to test out the veracity of a witnesses claim.

Or is it that it's only futile because it sought to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nyq737AtQjU

its absolutely futile because it sought test out the veracity of a witnesses claim..you have it in one...it was nothing to do with finding Maddie...the pj were a complete and utter disgrace ....  IMO