Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?

[Eleanor]

I find it quite fascinating the lengths some people go to to attack Amaral. Nothing he has said or stated hasn't been echoed by other people, repeatedly, yet he seems to be the paramount focus of certain. It would make an interesting psychological study into why he has become the focus of some peoples hatred.

Meanwhile, how would you know Eleanor what Amaral was doing. Were you there ?

Don't be silly, I don't hate him.  I actually feel rather sorry for him.  But one cannot ignore the facts.  He is a convicted criminal and fraudster, and he was sacked from the case, leaving a total mess behind which others had to try and make sense of.
Of course "His" Thesis can't be credible.

[stephen25000]

Don't be silly, I don't hate him.  I actually feel rather sorry for him.  But one cannot ignore the facts.  He is a convicted criminal and fraudster, and he was sacked from the case, leaving a total mess behind which others had to try and make sense of.
Of course "His" Thesis can't be credible.

He was sacked because he objected to interference in the case by UK police.

His 'thesis' as you call it has not been disproved.

It still remains 'type of crime unknown'.

Meanwhile nothing has been found by SY, has it ?

....and as we know the mccanns failed to fully cooperate in the investigation.

[Eleanor]

He was sacked because he objected to interference in the case by UK police.

His 'thesis' as you call it has not been disproved.

It still remains 'type of crime unknown'.

Meanwhile nothing has been found by SY, has it ?

....and as we know the mccanns failed to fully cooperate in the investigation.

Oh, I thought he wanted help from The UK Police.  Did he get upset because they didn't agree with him?  He certainly upset someone, but I thought it was The Hierarchy of The PJ that objected.

I agree, Type of Crime, Unknown.

SY are working on it with the cooperation of The PJ.

The McCanns did not fail to cooperate with the investigation.  They were never required in law to do or say anything that might have implicated them.

[jassi]

Oh, I thought he wanted help from The UK Police.  Did he get upset because they didn't agree with him?  He certainly upset someone, but I thought it was The Hierarchy of The PJ that objected.

I agree, Type of Crime, Unknown.

SY are working on it with the cooperation of The PJ.

The McCanns did not fail to cooperate with the investigation. They were never required in law to do or say anything that might have implicated them.

As perfect innocents, how could they have said anything to implicate themselves, or each other ?

[stephen25000]

Oh, I thought he wanted help from The UK Police.  Did he get upset because they didn't agree with him?  He certainly upset someone, but I thought it was The Hierarchy of The PJ that objected.

I agree, Type of Crime, Unknown.

SY are working on it with the cooperation of The PJ.

The McCanns did not fail to cooperate with the investigation.  They were never required in law to do or say anything that might have implicated them.

They did fail to fully cooperate with the in investigation.

That is a recorded fact..

If they really believed Madeleine could be found they  could have fully cooperated.

The non-cooperation was already in evidence before arguido status was invoked.

[stephen25000]

This thread is about Amaral's Credibility.

If it hadn't been for the mccanns you would never have heard of amaral or even attacked him.

This case revolves around the mccanns and ALWAYS WILL.

So get over it.

[Alfred R Jones]

So are you suggesting that however innocent a person might be, they should never answer any question in case it is later twisted?

Actually, yes there is a very good case to be made for this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

[Eleanor]

If it hadn't been for the mccanns you would never have heard of amaral or even attacked him.

This case revolves around the mccanns and ALWAYS WILL.

So get over it.

Amaral might wish he had never heard of The McCanns  Or written his disgusting book.  Or gone on television accusing The McCanns of complicity.  He has no one one but himself to blame for being exposed as a liar and a thief, which he is.

But at least The PJ might be a bit more careful about who they beat up.  Portuguese Citizens simply will not tolerate it anymore.

[Carana]

Actually, yes there is a very good case to be made for this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

Thanks for that. Really interesting and a bit scary...

[Montclair]

If Amaral had done his job properly from the beginning Madeleine could have been found yonks ago.  Or are you telling me he didn't know about the paedophile and the burglars?

God, some people are so obtuse and ignore any information which goes against their prejudices. You and some others keep blaming Gonçalo Amaral for something over which he had no power nor authority. He did not lead the investigation and did not steer it towards the hypothesis that Madeleine had died, that person was a Brit who was recommended by the Leicestershire police.

[Eleanor]

God, some people are so obtuse and ignore any information which goes against their prejudices. You and some others keep blaming Gonçalo Amaral for something over which he had no power nor authority. He did not lead the investigation and did not steer it towards the hypothesis that Madeleine had died, that person was a Brit who was recommended by the Leicestershire police.

So Amaral did not lead the investigation?  ORLY.

Actually, on reflection, I might be inclined to agree with you as Amaral doesn't seem to have been of much use at all.  He certainly didn't do any detecting.

[Montclair]

So Amaral did not lead the investigation?  ORLY.

Actually, on reflection, I might be inclined to agree with you as Amaral doesn't seem to have been of much use at all.  He certainly didn't do any detecting.

FGS, you still haven't realised that Gonçalo Amaral did not lead the investigation? It's not an opinion, it is a fact. Coordinators don't do detective work.

[Eleanor]

FGS, you still haven't realised that Gonçalo Amaral did not lead the investigation? It's not an opinion, it is a fact. Coordinators don't do detective work.

So in his book he just repeated what everyone else told him.  He doesn't actually hold these opinions himself.  In fact it was a lie that he suspected The McCanns on the very first morning after Madeleine disappeared?

So why is he being sued for Libel and Defamation when it is obviously someone else's fault?

Oh, And why did he get paid for doing it?

[Montclair]

So in his book he just repeated what everyone else told him.  He doesn't actually hold these opinions himself.  In fact it was a lie that he suspected The McCanns on the very first morning after Madeleine disappeared?

So why is he being sued for Libel and Defamation when it is obviously someone else's fault?

Oh, And why did he get paid for doing it?

He is being sued because he wrote a book, a book, you know. BTW, he didn't suspect them the very first morning as lot of people didn't.

[Eleanor]

He is being sued because he wrote a book, a book, you know. BTW, he didn't suspect them the very first morning as lot of people didn't.

He said in his book that he did.  Although God knows where he got that idea from since he didn't know what the hell was going on at that point.  Or later, for that matter.