« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 [39] 40 41 ... 51   Go Down

Author Topic: So what is the evidence for abduction?  (Read 157856 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #570 on: July 07, 2015, 11:08:41 PM »
Quote from: Brietta on July 07, 2015, 09:43:31 PM
Hmmm ... interesting you think there may be DNA available.  According to that article ... the abductor did not enter via the window he had opened. 
He stood outside, the child came to him, he lifted her out and made off with her.

If the story is proved to be true ... I would say there are one or two interesting parallels with the situation in Praia da Luz.

That connects to Smithman then after 9:30 not Tannerman - glad you worked it out in your own different way  8(0(*
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #571 on: July 07, 2015, 11:21:37 PM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on July 07, 2015, 11:08:41 PM
That connects to Smithman then after 9:30 not Tannerman - glad you worked it out in your own different way  8(0(*

Your thinking on that is definitely skew-whiff ... the man who fits best with anything I have to say is the one seen by Jane Tanner.
Smithman just doesn't enter into my thinking or that of most other people at all.
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline pathfinder73

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #572 on: July 08, 2015, 12:33:50 AM »
Quote from: Brietta on July 07, 2015, 11:21:37 PM
Your thinking on that is definitely skew-whiff ... the man who fits best with anything I have to say is the one seen by Jane Tanner.
Smithman just doesn't enter into my thinking or that of most other people at all.

That doesn't surprise me. You will be proven wrong of course.
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline misty

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #573 on: July 08, 2015, 01:21:20 AM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on July 08, 2015, 12:33:50 AM
That doesn't surprise me. You will be proven wrong of course.

What do you suppose the odds were of the officers/searchers all failing to ask the owners of Estrela da Luz for the CCTV footage from that very prominent camera so close to the OC within, say, the first 48 hours?
Logged

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #574 on: July 08, 2015, 01:38:44 AM »
Quote from: Brietta on July 07, 2015, 11:21:37 PM
Your thinking on that is definitely skew-whiff ... the man who fits best with anything I have to say is the one seen by Jane Tanner.
Smithman just doesn't enter into my thinking or that of most other people at all.

Who carries a 4 year old like "that"

??


ETA, like "Tannerman" I meant, not Mr Smithman





« Last Edit: July 08, 2015, 01:46:56 AM by mercury »
Logged

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #575 on: July 08, 2015, 07:01:38 AM »
Quote from: misty on July 08, 2015, 01:21:20 AM
What do you suppose the odds were of the officers/searchers all failing to ask the owners of Estrela da Luz for the CCTV footage from that very prominent camera so close to the OC within, say, the first 48 hours?
I have yet to see anything in the PJ files that suggests ANY footage from the CCTV cameras around Estrela da Luz made it into police hands.  If someone has seen an entry, I would love to be corrected on this.

PS Amaral definitely does not count on this point.
Logged
What's up, old man?

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #576 on: July 08, 2015, 08:13:11 AM »
Quote from: Brietta on July 07, 2015, 11:21:37 PM
Your thinking on that is definitely skew-whiff ... the man who fits best with anything I have to say is the one seen by Jane Tanner.
Smithman just doesn't enter into my thinking or that of most other people at all.

Oh dear, has DCI Redwood lost a supporter? I wonder who these 'most other people are'? A bit of a sweeping statement.
Logged
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #577 on: July 08, 2015, 08:23:54 AM »
Quote from: G-Unit on July 08, 2015, 08:13:11 AM
Oh dear, has DCI Redwood lost a supporter? I wonder who these 'most other people are'? A bit of a sweeping statement.

What might be considered more constructive would be a counter argument to anything I say with which you may disagree ... which when you think about it is almost everything.
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Eleanor

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #578 on: July 08, 2015, 08:34:04 AM »

Watch the insults please.
Logged

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #579 on: July 08, 2015, 08:38:49 AM »
Quote from: Brietta on July 08, 2015, 08:23:54 AM
What might be considered more constructive would be a counter argument to anything I say with which you may disagree ... which when you think about it is almost everything.

DCI Redwood found Tannerman and turned him into crecheman. i assume that's the end of the matter for SY.
Logged
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #580 on: July 08, 2015, 09:49:31 AM »
Quote from: G-Unit on July 08, 2015, 08:38:49 AM
DCI Redwood found Tannerman and turned him into crecheman. i assume that's the end of the matter for SY.

Not only that DCI Redwood said Smithman was person of interest they (MPS) wished to identify.
I wonder if they have.
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #581 on: July 08, 2015, 04:18:14 PM »
Quote from: Alice Purjorick on July 08, 2015, 09:49:31 AM
Not only that DCI Redwood said Smithman was person of interest they (MPS) wished to identify.
I wonder if they have.

according to Stephen they haven't
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #582 on: July 08, 2015, 06:56:05 PM »
Quote from: davel on July 08, 2015, 04:18:14 PM
according to Stephen they haven't

Actually, they got nothing.
Logged

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #583 on: July 08, 2015, 09:26:55 PM »
Not a single soul answered my question about who carries a four year old like Tannerman alledgedly did

Oh well
Logged

Offline misty

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #584 on: July 08, 2015, 09:45:14 PM »
Quote from: mercury on July 08, 2015, 09:26:55 PM
Not a single soul answered my question about who carries a four year old like Tannerman alledgedly did

Oh well

It is an adult method of carrying a young child, with minimal disturbance, lifted from a horizontal position (usually sleeping) with the intention of moving them to another place a short distance away & laying them down again.

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 37 38 [39] 40 41 ... 51   Go Up
« previous next »