Author Topic: So what is the evidence for abduction?  (Read 172635 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #630 on: July 09, 2015, 10:47:39 PM »
I don't believe their stories have changed...you are accusing them falsely.....all your allegations are based on twice translated files...which are not accurate

Not all statements have been twice translated, and leaving aside the fact that not all twice translated statements can be categorically stated to be all erroneous, we have plenty of statements in plain English, with NO translations required, we have plenty of TV footage, with No translation required and we have dozens on dozens of interviews in English featuring the Mccanns with NO translation required, so your attack/argument is groundless pretty much

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #631 on: July 09, 2015, 10:51:50 PM »
Respect for the rule of law is not (and will never be) an unreasonable request ...

except if you are the recipient Of a miscarriage of justice?  you meant to add that bit didn't you? or are you saying innocent people being found guilty- put to death or imprisoned is  OK? rule of law has nothing to do with justice?
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #632 on: July 09, 2015, 10:52:51 PM »
You are working from a very flawed basis indeed.  Reading two or three mistranslated sentences of Dostoyevsky  does not equate with understanding the plot of The Idiot.

Says the person who constantly quotes discredited tabloid articles to sustain her arguments. Your reference to the Idiot has not gone unnoticed of course and as far as this argument is concerned you really slipped qute a few notches. Reading a couple of slightly mistranslated sentences has never made anyones mind think one thing or a whole theory, try again.






ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #633 on: July 09, 2015, 10:57:26 PM »
except if you are the recipient Of a miscarriage of justice?  you meant to add that bit didn't you? or are you saying innocent people being found guilty- put to death or imprisoned is  OK? rule of law has nothing to do with justice?

Maligning and traducing an innocent couple has sod-all to do with the rule of law

Offline Anna

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #634 on: July 09, 2015, 10:58:02 PM »


Back on the topic of the thread please. without personal comments directed at other members. Thank you.
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #635 on: July 09, 2015, 11:28:20 PM »
shows how stupid amaral was...if maddie was taken by a paedophile she was dead anyway...if maddie was taken as a child for a childless couple...they would not harm her

Same can be said of the Mccanns publicising it then, no? by your logic?

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #636 on: July 09, 2015, 11:34:16 PM »

So, still no evidence of abduction mentioned as yet?
« Last Edit: July 10, 2015, 12:11:54 AM by Anna »
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #637 on: July 09, 2015, 11:38:40 PM »
It was all so easy until that nice Mr Redwood fragged "Tannerman The Abductor"  8(0(*

That's a point! Doesn't really matter now if he was carrying like this or that, owhether the pyjamas had frills or turn ups, whether his hair was short but actually long, his triusers cream or mustard, his shoe heifht 2" or 1 1/4" etc etc

I wonder if it was a shot across the bows...if not, why does the Official Madleine website still promote Tannerman and more or less ignore Smithman, which Redwood concentrated on as the person they are looking for?


« Last Edit: July 09, 2015, 11:53:13 PM by Anna »

Offline Anna

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #638 on: July 09, 2015, 11:49:04 PM »
Topic Please. Off topic posts will be deleted
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #639 on: July 10, 2015, 12:06:49 AM »
Topic Please. Off topic posts will be deleted

So why has MY post(s) been deleted but others OFF TOPIC ones havent?

Offline Anna

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #640 on: July 10, 2015, 12:10:06 AM »
So why has MY post(s) been deleted but others OFF TOPIC ones havent?

I am still working on it, Mercury.
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #641 on: July 10, 2015, 12:28:12 AM »
I am still working on it, Mercury.

SOZ Anna should have known better than to question an unbiased fair mod




Offline Lace

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #642 on: July 10, 2015, 09:21:19 AM »
That's a point! Doesn't really matter now if he was carrying like this or that, owhether the pyjamas had frills or turn ups, whether his hair was short but actually long, his triusers cream or mustard, his shoe heifht 2" or 1 1/4" etc etc

I wonder if it was a shot across the bows...if not, why does the Official Madleine website still promote Tannerman and more or less ignore Smithman, which Redwood concentrated on as the person they are looking for?

Could it be that they still promote the sighting of Tanner man,  so that if anyone saw him,  they could have been around at that time of night and have seen something else?

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #643 on: July 10, 2015, 10:37:29 AM »
Could it be that they still promote the sighting of Tanner man,  so that if anyone saw him,  they could have been around at that time of night and have seen something else?

Maybe the British tourist who said it could be him taking his child for a long walk round a seaside resort on a chilly night in just pyjamas was mistaken, and there were two people about carrying a child in that manner and wearing the same clothes? Or maybe someone saw him meeting up with one of the unsavoury chaaracters in the efits?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Lace

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #644 on: July 10, 2015, 10:44:19 AM »
Maybe the British tourist who said it could be him taking his child for a long walk round a seaside resort on a chilly night in just pyjamas was mistaken, and there were two people about carrying a child in that manner and wearing the same clothes? Or maybe someone saw him meeting up with one of the unsavoury chaaracters in the efits?

Well,   I don't know G. Unit  there could be someone who saw something.