Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories

[starryian]

Having read back, I see all the warnings issued to you for lecturing people about psychopaths -not!
I don't think I've ever come accross ANY members lecturing other members, in fact it's the fist site I've been on where everyone respect each others posts and when/if (on the few occasions) it goes to hell in a hand basket, it's quickly stopped and we generally know who it is 

Well said Joanne,
The person who posted that comment on the blue forum is clearly seeking attention. It is a little bit like a child making a noise to get everyone to notice them. I know my comments rile some of the supporters, but I try to be as honest as I can with the evidence that is available to me. If some of them cant deal with that........I am sorry but that's the way it is.

[puglove]

It's very naughty of Hartley 1 and Hartley 2 to confuse poor Buddy. He is never at his best in the afternoons.

I hope NGB 1066 is pming the poor chap!

That blue forum! It's like listening in to an old folk's home!

[Joanne]

Its like a kids playground, "You said you were my friend, not his, you can't be friends with both of us, chose one" with what they're posting on the said thread.

[puglove]

Its like a kids playground, "You said you were my friend, not his, you can't be friends with both of us, chose one" with what they're posting on the said thread.

It's hilarious (though I don't think it's intended to be.) But this is what comes from being encouraged to use multiple aliases to up the membership, now half of them are terminally paranoid and the other half can't remember who they're supposed to be!!!!

[starryian]

Its like a kids playground, "You said you were my friend, not his, you can't be friends with both of us, chose one" with what they're posting on the said thread.

Absolutely Joanne,
It is like a playground in a primary school. 

[puglove]

Its like a kids playground, "You said you were my friend, not his, you can't be friends with both of us, chose one" with what they're posting on the said thread.

Absolutely Joanne,
It is like a playground in a primary school. 

Bamber's supporters are a cerebral bunch! I've learnt so much about perfume and cake lately!

[puglove]

Its like a kids playground, "You said you were my friend, not his, you can't be friends with both of us, chose one" with what they're posting on the said thread.

Absolutely Joanne,
It is like a playground in a primary school. 

Bamber's supporters are a cerebral bunch! I've learnt so much about perfume and cake lately!

Poor David Rochford!

[goatboy]

Wow! I can't believe you've got your own thread at Tesko towers Ian! You seem to have them riled over there. I don't think they like it when people use logic, evidence and coherent arguments to make a point. It confuses them.
They don't like you calling Bamber a psychopath that's for sure. They protest too much I think.

[starryian]

Wow! I can't believe you've got your own thread at Tesko towers Ian! You seem to have them riled over there. I don't think they like it when people use logic, evidence and coherent arguments to make a point. It confuses them.
They don't like you calling Bamber a psychopath that's for sure. They protest too much I think.

Absolutely Goatboy,
They appear to have gone completely bonkers. Some of them also got a little nasty when challenged over their assumptions of Bamber's innocence. Some of the posts on there truly beggars belief. I think they must just get carried away.
                                        8-)(--)

[John]

Hey......seems I have my own thread on the blue forum put there by someone called 'Hartley' but get this; it is NOT the usual Hartley......it is someone that has stolen his name 
He then launches into a vitriolic rant.
 Shame this person is a dedicated fly-poster that hides behind a succession of names. Please Mr...erm 'Hartley' try to debate with people.....and not post childish, misleading comments and run away.

You could not make this up 

Welcome to the club Ian, you must be getting them all riled up with your very informed posts.          

[John]

I wonder if AA can answer his one.  Did you notice a marked change in Jeremy over the 20 or so years you visited him in prison?

John, I don't know how you will interpret this but it did amaze me how, through thick and thin, the highs and lows, his attitude and demeanour remained the same throughout.

There is exception of course, when his second Appeal failed. For a short while he was on suicide watch (I'm not stating that he was suicidal though, that could be normal procedure).....but he hit a dark place and it took some effort to bring him back....and once back, he remained there - until he began to control the Groups and the campaign.  He had never tried to control me before....and I feel he found me difficult to deal with, so yes, he changed again.  He began to lie to me and become more aggressive towards me......however, Tracey Brazier was the main cause behind that.  Her lies upset and confused him.....wasted his time chasing flying pigs whilst he should have been concentrating on his campaign.

Sorry guys, but a cycle ride calls........0-0"............

I could nearly be sorry for him Aunt Agatha.    I can certainly empathise with him over his failed appeals though to a lesser degree.  I remember packing my stuff up on two occasions when I was sure that I would be going home only to be knocked back.  Once at the end of my trial when the Sheriff said that he was going to take the weekend to consider if there was even a case to answer and then later when my lawyers applied for Interim Liberation pending my main appeal.

My appeals took so long to organise that they had to hear my appeal against sentence even before my main appeal, something which doesn't usually occur.  Even then I had been told by the Parole Board that I was going to be released in any event some weeks later.  I was so used to knock backs that I didn't pack anything but the appeal succeeded and I was kicked out at 7pm just in time to miss the last plane home.

[Milly]

Hey......seems I have my own thread on the blue forum put there by someone called 'Hartley' but get this; it is NOT the usual Hartley......it is someone that has stolen his name 
He then launches into a vitriolic rant.
 Shame this person is a dedicated fly-poster that hides behind a succession of names. Please Mr...erm 'Hartley' try to debate with people.....and not post childish, misleading comments and run away.

You could not make this up 

Hi everyone.   Just back from my hols and ready to go.   

Good on you Ian you must be getting to them at last.   

[Milly]

Where have all the regulars gone to on the blue forum???

Grahame, keira, ngb1066 all seem to have disappeared and the rest are hiding behind fake names??   >@@(*&)


Jeremy must be so pleased that his forum is beginning to look like a session from the women's institute by all accounts.   

[John]

Where have all the regulars gone to on the blue forum???

Grahame, keira, ngb1066 all seem to have disappeared and the rest are hiding behind fake names??   >@@(*&)


Jeremy must be so pleased that his forum is beginning to look like a session from the women's institute by all accounts.   

Most definitely and the subjects under discussion could well be taken from an episode of the Darling Buds of May or even The Archers.   8-)(--)

I am sure Jeremy will be most heartened by their efforts on his behalf.

[Dillon]

Well done Ian ! Fame at last. YOUR VERY OWN thread on the famous blue forum . Broke my new rule and had a look. The sad folk regurgitating the same old crap again and again and again ad nauseum. Oh dear " Maggie ", how many times can you repeat the same ill informed, malicious and overstated nonsense about Sheila's mental health . And you guys complain about Ian describing Jeremy as a psychopath. Your hypocrisy has no limits. And Buddy the fountain of all wisdom on the case seems to be losing it too. A really cross old chap. Shame as I thought that he was one of the more thoughtful posters on the blue forum. Chill mate before you make yourself ill.