Author Topic: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.  (Read 78522 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Moderator

Quote from: Archiving Report
We believe that the main damage was caused to the McCann orthodox, who lost the possibility to prove what they have protested since they were constituted arguidos: their innocence towards the fateful event; the investigation was also disturbed, because said facts remain unclarified.

To clarify then, the archiving report is effectively declaring that the McCanns failed to take every opportunity provided to them in order to prove their innocence and by their own actions created a situation whereby the investigation had to be shelved.

Far from being cleared the archiving report raises more questions than provides answers.

The 48 questions which Kate McCann refused to answer when questioned by the Portuguese police investigating the disappearance of her daughter Madeleine.

These are the questions:

1. On May 3 2007, around 22:00, when you entered the apartment, what did you see? What did you do? Where did you look? What did you touch?
2.  Did you search inside the bedroom wardrobe? (she replied that she wouldn’t answer)
3. (shown 2 photographs of her bedroom wardrobe) Can you describe its contents?
4.  Why had the curtain behind the sofa in front of the side window (whose photo was shown to her) been tampered with? Did somebody go behind that sofa?
5. How long did your search of the apartment take after you detected your daughter Madeleine’s disappearance?
6. Why did you say from the start that Madeleine had been abducted?
7. Assuming Madeleine had been abducted, why did you leave the twins home alone to go to the ‘Tapas’ and raise the alarm? Because the supposed abductor could still be in the apartment.
8. Why didn’t you ask the twins, at that moment, what had happened to their sister or why didn’t you ask them later on?
9. When you raised the alarm at the ‘Tapas’ what exactly did you say and what were your exact words?
10. What happened after you raised the alarm in the ‘Tapas’?
11. Why did you go and warn your friends instead of shouting from the verandah?
12. Who contacted the authorities?
13.  Who took place in the searches?
14.  Did anyone outside of the group learn of Madeleine’s disappearance in those following minutes?
15. Did any neighbour offer you help after the disappearance?
16. What does 'we let her down' mean?
17.  Did Jane tell you that night that she’d seen a man with a child?
18.  How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted?
19. During the searches, with the police already there, where did you search for Maddie, how and in what way?
20. Why did the twins not wake up during that search or when they were taken upstairs?
21. Who did you phone after the occurrence?
22. Did you call Sky News?
23. Did you know the danger of calling the media, because it could influence the abductor?
24. Did you ask for a priest?
25. By what means did you divulge Madeleine’s features, by photographs or by any other means?
26. Is it true that during the searches you remained seated on Maddie’s bed without moving?
27. What was your behaviour that night?
28. Did you manage to sleep?
29. Before travelling to Portugal did you make any comment about a foreboding or a bad feeling?
30. What was Madeleine’s behaviour like?
31. Did Maddie suffer from any illness or take any medication?
32. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister?
33. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister, friends and school mates?
34. As for your professional life, in how many and which hospitals have you worked?
35. What is your medical specialty?
36. Have you ever done shift work in any emergency services or other services?
37. Did you work every day?
38. At a certain point you stopped working, why?
39. Are the twins difficult to get to sleep? Are they restless and does that cause you uneasiness?
40.  Is it true that sometimes you despaired with your children’s behaviour and that left you feeling very uneasy?
41. Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine’s custody to a relative?
42. In England, did you medicate your children? What type of medication?
43.   In the case files you were SHOWN CANINE forensic testing films, where you can see them marking due to detection of the scent of human corpse and blood traces, also human, and only human, as well as all the comments of the technician in charge of them. After watching and after the marking of the scent of corpse in your bedroom beside the wardrobe and behind the sofa, pushed up against the sofa wall, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
44.   When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
45.  When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
46.  When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
47.   When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, whose analysis was carried out in a British laboratory, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
48.   Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter’s disappearance?

49. THE QUESTION SHE DID ANSWER:

Q.  Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?
A.  'Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1041635/The-48-questions-Kate-McCann-wouldnt-answer--did.html#ixzz34VCmDWYw
« Last Edit: June 28, 2014, 05:56:09 AM by John »

Offline Albertini

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2014, 10:37:01 PM »
To clarify then, the archiving report is effectively declaring that the McCanns failed to take every opportunity provided to them in order to prove their innocence and by their own actions created a situation whereby the investigation had to be shelved.

Correct, furthermore link this in to the 48 questions Kate refused to answer. The only question she answered was:

"You are aware, are you, that by not answering you're jeopardising the investigation into your daughter's fate?"

To which she replied, "yes".

Now there can only be two possible outcomes as a result of them choosing to deliberately sabotaging the investigation and answering in the affirmative to a question relating to them damaging  the only investigation, and at that time, by the only police force in the world looking for their daughter.

[... moderated ...]

« Last Edit: June 11, 2014, 02:51:40 AM by John »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2014, 10:58:15 PM »
Correct, furthermore link this in to the 48 questions Kate refused to answer. The only question she answered was:

"You are aware, are you, that by not answering you're jeopardising the investigation into your daughter's fate?"

To which she replied, "yes".

Now there can only be two possible outcomes as a result of them choosing to deliberately sabotaging the investigation and answering in the affirmative to a question relating to them damaging  the only investigation, and at that time, by the only police force in the world looking for their daughter.

[... moderated ...]
At the time that the McCanns were made arguidos can you tell me exactly what the PJ were doing to find Madeleine?
« Last Edit: June 11, 2014, 02:52:16 AM by John »

Offline Brietta

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2014, 10:59:34 PM »
Correct, furthermore link this in to the 48 questions Kate refused to answer. The only question she answered was:

"You are aware, are you, that by not answering you're jeopardising the investigation into your daughter's fate?"

To which she replied, "yes".

Now there can only be two possible outcomes as a result of them choosing to deliberately sabotaging the investigation and answering in the affirmative to a question relating to them damaging  the only investigation, and at that time, by the only police force in the world looking for their daughter.

[... moderated ...]


The PJ were not looking for Madeleine at this stage.  They were now investigating her parents.

I think your quote has lost something in translation?  I don't think the following is quite as you have quoted it.


Q.  Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?

A.  'Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.'


« Last Edit: June 11, 2014, 02:52:49 AM by John »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Albertini

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2014, 11:00:10 PM »
At the time that the McCanns were made arguidos can you tell me exactly what the PJ were doing to find Madeleine?

They were running the only investigation that was searching for their missing child.

To sabotage the investigation was to effectively sign the poor child's death warrant.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2014, 11:02:09 PM »
They were running the only investigation that was searching for their missing child.

To sabotage the investigation was to effectively sign the poor child's death warrant.
But I thought you were of the opinion she had died on the 3rd May or before? 


Offline Albertini

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2014, 11:02:17 PM »

The PJ were not looking for Madeleine at this stage.  They were now investigating her parents.

I think your quote has lost something in translation?  I don't think the following is quite as you have quoted it.


Q.  Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?

A.  'Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.'

Yes they were looking for Madeleine, but the parents clearly didn't like where the investigation was looking at that time.

That says far more about the parents than it does about the investigation.

So kate did answer in the affirmative to that question put to her.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2014, 11:03:31 PM »
Yes they were looking for Madeleine, but the parents clearly didn't like where the investigation was looking at that time.

That says far more about the parents than it does about the investigation.

So kate did answer in the affirmative to that question put to her.
Where were they looking for Madeleine?  How were they looking for her?  By asking her mother a bunch of dumbass questions?

Offline Albertini

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2014, 11:07:26 PM »
But I thought you were of the opinion she had died on the 3rd May or before?

My opinions have no bearing on this issue.

The point is that if the parents genuinely believed the child had been abducted, then by refusing to answer the question and by sabotaging the investigation, THEY the parents were signing the child's death warrant.

However if the parents knew what happened to the child on the 3rd May or before then their answers would not matter nor have the monstrous connotations their actions and answers imbues if they genuinely felt the child had been abducted.

Offline Albertini

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2014, 11:09:40 PM »
Where were they looking for Madeleine?  How were they looking for her?  By asking her mother a bunch of dumbass questions?

Irrelevant. They were following the leads and evidence they had. Are you disputing that the investigation was not trying to find out what happened to Madeleine??

Really?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2014, 11:10:42 PM »
My opinions have no bearing on this issue.

The point is that if the parents genuinely believed the child had been abducted, then by refusing to answer the question and by sabotaging the investigation, THEY the parents were signing the child's death warrant.

However if the parents knew what happened to the child on the 3rd May or before then their answers would not matter nor have the monstrous connotations their actions and answers imbues if they genuinely felt the child had been abducted.

This is absurd and you must surely know it.  The McCanns were the main suspects.  Put yourself in their shoes and imagine if you can that they had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance (a big leap for a doubter I know).   Now tell me how answering those questions is going to save Madeleine from the hands of whoever took her.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2014, 11:12:59 PM by Alfred R Jones »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2014, 11:12:19 PM »
Irrelevant. They were following the leads and evidence they had. Are you disputing that the investigation was not trying to find out what happened to Madeleine??

Really?
They were trying to establish the parents guilt.  The fact that they never conducted searches like the ones being carried out now indicate that they weren't all that bothered about finding the child, dead or alive.

Offline Brietta

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2014, 11:15:04 PM »
Yes they were looking for Madeleine, but the parents clearly didn't like where the investigation was looking at that time.

That says far more about the parents than it does about the investigation.

So kate did answer in the affirmative to that question put to her.

These 'questions' had already been answered.

43.   In the case files you were SHOWN CANINE forensic testing films, where you can see them marking due to detection of the scent of human corpse and blood traces, also human, and only human, as well as all the comments of the technician in charge of them. After watching and after the marking of the scent of corpse in your bedroom beside the wardrobe and behind the sofa, pushed up against the sofa wall, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

44.   When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

45.  When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

46.  When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

47.   When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, whose analysis was carried out in a British laboratory, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Albertini

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2014, 11:15:41 PM »
This is absurd and you must sureky know it.  The McCanns were the main suspects.  Put yourself in their shoes and imagine if you can that they had nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance (a big leap for a doubter I know).   Now tell me how answering those questions is going to save Madeleine from the hands of whoever took her.

Utter drivel. The McCann's were main suspects to the PJ through their statements actions and investigative diligences. Clear them up by answering every question and performing everything required to prove their innocence (to quote the archiving report) which would then force the PJ to look elsewhere.

You're not going to be spouting the loony conspiracy "fitting up" theory that a country could somehow fit up the parents in the most high profile criminal case in the world at that time?

If you are going down this road just let me know so i can dig my tin foil hat out.

Offline Albertini

Re: Kate's refusal on legal advice to answer those 48 questions.
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2014, 11:16:50 PM »
They were trying to establish the parents guilt.  The fact that they never conducted searches like the ones being carried out now indicate that they weren't all that bothered about finding the child, dead or alive.

Crikey, you are going down this fitting up route.

Give me a minute to get my hat.