Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.

[Mr Gray]

After the trial of several PJ officers which saw Gonçalo Amaral found guilty of failing to report, Leonor Cipriano's lawyer, Marcos Aragão Correia, said: "Target was hit, Gonçalo Amaral was convicted".

Need we say any more?

Yes John you need to say a lot more
Like what evidence do you have that this was ever said
I believe it's total tosh and there is still no evidence for any campaign

[Mr Gray]

So back to square one
No evidence to support the OT

[ferryman]

Clearly the Joana Cipriano case and the Madeleine McCann case had much in common but coincidentally the same Portuguese detective was tasked with coordinating both disappearances, that detective was Dr Gonçalo Amaral.

Spanish private investigators Método 3, based in Barcelona, were tasked with finding Madeleine McCann but it appears that their brief extended much further.

We look at who said what and when.

169

Well, one claim common to both cases was that of 'human remains hidden in a fridge'.

At least, in the Joana Cipriano case, the fridge alleged to hold human remains was actually identified ....

[Mr Gray]

What we do know is that Arsgeo wrote a paper claiming that Ciprianos was tortured by the PJ in order to extract a confession
Amaral sued and lost
So the court accepted torture was used to extract a confession
I don't have access to a pic at the moment so apologies I cannot provide a cite
But will on my return to the uk

[John]

What we do know is that Arsgeo wrote a paper claiming that Ciprianos was tortured by the PJ in order to extract a confession
Amaral sued and lost
So the court accepted torture was used to extract a confession
I don't have access to a pic at the moment so apologies I cannot provide a cite
But will on my return to the uk

The Ciprianos and Silva were roughed up in an attempt to find out where the missing child was, it had nothing to do with any confession.  Both John Cipriano and his sister Leandro independenly admitted their involvement in the child's fate long before the assaults.  For the record, Leonor now puts the blame firmly at John's door but then she has uttered so many versions of what happened that it is hard to take her seriously.

[Mr Gray]

The Ciprianos and Silva were roughed up in an attempt to find out where the missing child was, it had nothing to do with any confession.

According to the paper by arageo it did
Amaral sued and lost so it follows that the court accepted the torture
If you want us to accept your post re arageo you need to provide a x
Cite reliable his remark
Target hit
I think this statement is another myth

[stephen25000]

Correia ...

''Target was hit.Goncarlo Amaral was convicted''.

[misty]

Correia ...

''Target was hit.Goncarlo Amaral was convicted''.

Has anyone considered that comment (if it was made) was in connection with Correia's own situation & his 500,000euro personal claim, plus the same amount for Leandro, against Amaral?

[Mr Gray]

You are not debating.

Your posts are goading and clearly disrupting this thread.

Thanks to John , we now have the quotation from Correia after one of his cases involving Amaral.


Your continued denials and disruption are expected.

Asking for  and providing quotes is part of forum rules
The quote you refer to has no cite and is therefore of no value

[stephen25000]

Has anyone considered that comment (if it was made) was in connection with Correia's own situation & his 500,000euro personal claim, plus the same amount for Leandro, against Amaral?

So what financial claim did Correia or Leandro win from Amaral ?

[stephen25000]

Asking for  and providing quotes is part of forum rules
The quote you refer to has no cite and is therefore of no value

Been done and from the forum owner.

You are now merely disrupting the thread and goading other posters.

That is against the forum rules.

Please desist.

[Mr Gray]

Has anyone considered that comment (if it was made) was in connection with Correia's own situation & his 500,000euro personal claim, plus the same amount for Leandro, against Amaral?

No cite no context no use
And no support for the OT which remains speculation

[stephen25000]

Incorrect.

You are disrupting the thread and goading posters by implying they are not following the forum rules, including the owner of the forum.

Please desist.

[Mr Gray]

Incorrect.

You are disrupting the thread and goading posters by impyling they are not following the forum rules, including the owner of the forum.

Please desist.

I will continue to ask for a quote
asking for a quote is not goading

[stephen25000]

I will continue to ask for a quote
asking for a quote is not goading

The quotes and cites have been provided.

You are not accepting them, and you never will.

That is disruption and goading.