Author Topic: Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.  (Read 171229 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
A defence only of your inability to provide a cite ... for anything.  It is really inappropriate and indefensible on a fact based forum.  In my opinion everything you have posted for which you are unable to provide provenance just should not see the light of day on the threads of this forum.

I provided cites on here , for this thread.

Why you deny it, is crystal clear, and have no doubt 'sceptics' as we are sometimes called, know full well what you are doing and why.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2017, 01:28:52 PM by Angelo222 »

Offline carlymichelle


I provided cites on here , for this thread.

Why you deny it, is crystal clear, and have no doubt 'sceptics' as we are sometimes called, know full well what you are doing and why.

some  seem to be  hostile on here  right now??
« Last Edit: January 04, 2017, 01:29:09 PM by Angelo222 »

Offline Mr Gray

I see my previous reply was deleted.

I provided cites on here , for this thread.

Why you deny it, is crystal clear, and have no doubt 'sceptics' as we are sometimes called, know full well what you are doing and why.
No cite for the source of the statement
A complete myth IMO

stephen25000

  • Guest
some  seem to be  hostile on here  right now??

Indeed Carly.

As regards the McCann's stories, the  observation that an ever diminishing people who believe their tale of abduction applies.

Still waiting for cites to show an abduction happened.

Offline Mr Gray

Indeed Carly.

As regards the McCann's stories, the  observation that an ever diminishing people who believe their tale of abduction applies.

Still waiting for cites to show an abduction happened.

Then you are on the wrong thread
I don't propose to answer something so off topic

stephen25000

  • Guest
As John said in the early hours.............


' I must say it is funny watching some posters attempt to defend the indefensible.  Several Portuguese lawyers representing the PJ inspectors and Leonor Cipriano herself reported that Correia had attempted to do deals with them if they pointed the finger and thus the blame at Amaral.  In any language that amounted to a targeting of Amaral himself.  Correia and his paymaster cronies thought that if they discredited Amaral then his thesis relating to Madeleine McCann would also be discredited.  They both deserve each other imo. '

stephen25000

  • Guest
I asked John for a cite and he has not provided one
I believe this is just another myth
Can you prove me wrong
No ....just another myth imo

Not a myth.

Just read what Correia has said.

These denials are increasingly and truly pathetic.

IMHO.

Offline Mr Gray

Not a myth.

Just read what Correia has said.

These denials are increasingly and truly pathetic.

IMHO.

Read where
On bennetts blog
Until it has any provenance it cannot be regarded as true
« Last Edit: January 04, 2017, 09:01:08 AM by davel »

Offline slartibartfast

« Last Edit: January 05, 2017, 03:26:03 AM by Angelo222 »
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.


stephen25000

  • Guest
does  davel care about maddie or her parents more? i bet he  doesnt  answer

The answer is self-evident IMO.

Offline Mr Gray

http://sicnoticias.sapo.pt/programas/reportagemsic/2009-02-13-detectives-contratados-pelos-mccann-quiseram-tramar-goncalo-amaral

Good to see someone posting on topic
Does this link include the statement in question
On a quick look no but can put through google translate tomorrow
So still no cite
I would think
If there was a translation slarti would have posted it
So does slarti know what the link he has posted actually sAys
Probably not
« Last Edit: January 04, 2017, 09:27:56 AM by davel »

stephen25000

  • Guest
Correia was employed to after Amaral.

No doubt about it.

Any guest reading the forum will know that as well.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Good to see someone posting on topic
Does this link include the statement in question
On a quick look no but can put through google translate tomorrow
So still no cite
I would think
If there was a translation slarti would have posted it
So does slarti know what the link he has posted actually sAys
Probably not

That link has already been posted on this thread.

Didn't you notice ?

Offline Mr Gray

That link has already been posted on this thread.

Didn't you notice ?
So where is the quote in it you claim exists
It isn't there and proves you wrong