Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.

[Mr Gray]

Precisely Angelo.

Just Angelo opinion
As Angelo says

[Mr Gray]

We have seen more evidence of a campaign to discredit correia

[Alfie]

We have seen more evidence of a campaign to discredit correia

And there is a superabundance of evidence pointing to a concerted campaign to discredit the McCanns which has lasted the best part of 10 years.

[Benice]

We would have to go through the 'history' between the two men to do that thoroughly.

Well Alfie, he did try to persuade 4 of Amaral's colleagues to do a 'deal' implicating Amaral.

Now I believe in this country that could be labelled as interfering with witnesses, which I believe is a criminal offence.

If that is the case then why IYO wasn't he arrested by the PJ  for the criminal offence of 'interfering with witnesses' - especially as they would have had at least 4 witnesses to such criminal behaviour - and so could easily prove the case against him? 

[stephen25000]

If that is the case then why IYO wasn't he arrested by the PJ  for the criminal offence of 'interfering with witnesses' - especially as they would have had at least 4 witnesses to such criminal behaviour - and so could easily prove the case against him?

He should have been.

No doubt about it.

In the UK , he would be serving time.

[Mr Gray]

He should have been.

No doubt about it.

In the UK , he would be serving time.

But there is no independent evidence it is true

[Benice]

He should have been.

No doubt about it.

In the UK , he would be serving time.

So why isn't he serving time in PT with such a strong case against him?  If  what you claim is true then why would the PJ miss such a golden opportunity of a successful prosecution?  Why would the PJ  turn a blind eye to such a criminal act - when they had several witnesses to call upon to support their case?   That makes no sense to me.

[stephen25000]

So why isn't he serving time in PT with such a strong case against him?  If  what you claim is true then why would the PJ miss such a golden opportunity of a successful prosecution?  Why would the PJ  turn a blind eye to such a criminal act - when they had several witnesses to call upon to support their case?   That makes no sense to me.

It isn't  a claim Benice, he admitted it.


As to why he wasn't..................

[Mr Gray]

So why isn't he serving time in PT with such a strong case against him?  If  what you claim is true then why would the PJ miss such a golden opportunity of a successful prosecution?  Why would the PJ  turn a blind eye to such a criminal act - when they had several witnesses to call upon to support their case?   That makes no sense to me.

Amaral sued correia and lost..... he was totally humiliated.
Any suggestion that is is true and amaral missed the opportunity to ask his pals to report a crime is ridiculous
The claim is obviously false

[Mr Gray]

It isn't  a claim Benice, he admitted it.


As to why he wasn't..................

Cite
Your claims are becoming more and more bizarre
There is no record anywhere of him admitting this

[stephen25000]

Amaral sued correia and lost..... he was totally humiliated.
Any suggestion that is is true and amaral missed the opportunity to ask his pals to report a crime is ridiculous
The claim is obviously false

It's not Amaral facing total humiliation .

[stephen25000]

Cite
Your claims are becoming more and more bizarre
There is no record anywhere of him admitting this

Doh, don't be foolish.


It's on this thread and widely on the net, from Correia directly.


Actually, your counter posts have become laughable, and for more reasons than you realize.

[Mr Gray]

Doh, don't be foolish.


It's on this thread and widely on the net, from Correia directly.


Actually, your counter posts have become laughable, and for more reasons than you realize.

There is absolutely no cite for him admitting this
A lawyer would not admit to a criminal offence
So no cite again

[Benice]

It isn't  a claim Benice, he admitted it.


As to why he wasn't..................

You haven't answered my question.      If the evidence against him was so strong that a prosecution in the UK would have led to a prison sentence IYO, then why didn't the PJ prosecute him? 

Could it be that they are not as competent as the UK police IYO?

or

Could it be that there was no prosecution because there was no evidence to support one?

Personally I believe the second option to be the reason as I do not believe the PJ would allow such a criminal act to go unprosecuted in the knowledge that they had the necessary evidence to charge him and procure a successful prosecution.    What other reason could there be for their lack of action?

[stephen25000]

You haven't answered my question.      If the evidence against him was so strong that a prosecution in the UK would have led to a prison sentence IYO, then why didn't the PJ prosecute him? 

Could it be that they are not as competent as the UK police IYO?

or

Could it be that there was no prosecution because there was no evidence to support one?

Personally I believe the second option to be the reason as I do not believe the PJ would allow such a criminal act to go unprosecuted in the knowledge that they had the necessary evidence to charge him and procure a successful prosecution.    What other reason could there be for their lack of action?

As I said Benice, he admitted it.

I don't know how the Portuguese system works, but it would surely in the equivalent of the CPS,if there is one.

Perhaps S.I.L. can enlighten us on this, or Montclair.