Author Topic: Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.  (Read 171226 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Admin

I have already warned of the consequences of disrupting this thread. Members who continue to disrupt will be further sanctioned.

Offline Benice

Oh let's see, he first claimed seeing Maddie at a dam in a dream then changed his story claiming he was told to search the Arade Dam by an informer.  The man is a fantasist pure and simple.

You really need to stop disrupting this thread davel, warning issued.

And yet Kates's dream was deemed to have changed the whole course of the case?   No mention of 'fantasing' by anyone in her case - in fact it was regarded as massively important evidence against her.

So on the one hand a dream proves the dreamer is a fantasist  - and on the other hand a dream confirms the dreamer is not a fantasist but is probably guilty of a heinous crime.

What sort of logic is that?

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Mr Gray

So asking for cites is disruption but posting opinion as fact and refusing to provide cites is not disruption
The whole of this thread is based on cut and pastes from extremely pro amaral sites
That puts the criticism of correia into context and it seems to me there is a campaign from the amaral sites to discredit him

We have the transcript from outside court and nowhere does the phrase
The target was hit feature

Offline Admin

So asking for cites is disruption but posting opinion as fact and refusing to provide cites is not disruption
The whole of this thread is based on cut and pastes from extremely pro amaral sites
That puts the criticism of correia into context and it seems to me there is a campaign from the amaral sites to discredit him

We have the transcript from outside court and nowhere does the phrase
The target was hit feature

Are you calling Leonor Cipriano's former lawyer John Grade and the inspector's lawyers liars by any chance?  If not, their evidence alone is extremely harmful to Sr Correia.  Attempting to pervert the course of justice is a serious matter in any jurisdiction.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2017, 01:27:29 PM by Admin »

Offline Mr Gray

Are you calling Leonor Cipriano's former lawyer John Grade and the inspector's lawyers liars by any chance?  If not, their evidence alone is extremely harmful to Sr Correia.  Attempting to pervert the course of justice is a serious matter in any jurisdiction.
Do you have actual quotes from these lawyers
That would be a good place to start

Offline Mr Gray

Do you ever do research before you post nonsense?  Correia admitted approaching the defendants and offering them deals if they would point the finger at Amaral.

Admitted where
I don't accept unsubstantiated claims
If you are claiming this as fact then you will have a cite
Perhaps you could also explain in what capacity and on whose authority he made this offer
Surely he had no role in the prosecution of the officers and was in no position to offer any deal

Offline jassi

A 'deal' could have been a cash payment for services rendered.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

A 'deal' could have been a cash payment for services rendered.
If you read the claim it's the promise of a reduced sentence which as everyone knows he was in no position on to make
Makes the claim look false

Offline jassi

OK, but you don't accept that there was a deal anyway, so if there was, it could have been for anything.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

OK, but you don't accept that there was a deal anyway, so if there was, it could have been for anything.
The claim is for a reduced sentence if you read the link

Offline jassi

The claim is for a reduced sentence if you read the link

As I understand it, you don't accept that link.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

As I understand it, you don't accept that link.
If you read the thread you will see what I do and do not accept
As it is im waiting for a cite  from admin and Angelo
« Last Edit: January 05, 2017, 02:59:01 PM by davel »

Offline Mr Gray

So could someone explain how correia was able to offer a reduced sentence deal
What influence did he have

Offline Angelo222

So could someone explain how correia was able to offer a reduced sentence deal
What influence did he have

You really take the biscuit davel.  Its called cooperating with the prosecution.  Correia has given a long interview on the subject which I'm sure you can find but just in case you can't the crux of it was that he made the suggestion to the defence lawyers that if their clients were to state that they were ordered to torture Cipriano by Amaral then the court would look upon them favourably.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2017, 03:48:37 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

You really take the biscuit davel.  Its called cooperating with the prosecution.  Correia has given a long interview on the subject which I'm sure you can find but just in case you can't the crux of it was that he made the suggestion to the defence lawyers that if their clients were to state that they were ordered to torture Cipriano by Amaral then the court would look upon them favourably.

So you are now saying he did not offer a deal but suggested they make a deal with the prosecution
That's quite quite different and not as it has been portrayed my persistence has payed off
And you still haven't provided a first hand account

So correia never offered any sort of deal
Thank you so much