Author Topic: Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.  (Read 156969 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ferryman

  • Guest
She went quiet.

It was very overdue.

I found her quite obnoxious.

Words fail me (for once) ...

Offline Benice

Correia is a proven liar.

As it stands now, I will not take for granted anything a Mccann supporter states in support of the McCann's as an undisputed fact.

Have you read through the court transcripts ?

You didn't answer that question.

What court transcripts?.   As far as I know none have been released to the public or published on the web.    If I'm wrong then perhaps you can tell me where to find them.  If you can that would be much appreciated.

Incidentally  - you still haven't answered my question.

 
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Mr Gray

What court transcripts?.   As far as I know none have been released to the public or published on the web.    If I'm wrong then perhaps you can tell me where to find them.  If you can that would be much appreciated.

Incidentally  - you still haven't answered my question.

Stephen THINKS he has posted court transcripts
He is seriously confused
He has posted some comments on the proceedings by an unknown author

Offline Angelo222

Stephen THINKS he has posted court transcripts
He is seriously confused
He has posted some comments on the proceedings by an unknown author

And you have provided official commentary or cite from the man himself or anyone else in the know for that matter denying the comment?   Have you not realised by now that this was all part of Correia's little game to embarrass Amaral and he enjoyed every moment of it?
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 11:12:27 AM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

And you have provided official commentary or cite from the man himself or anyone else in the know for that matter denying the comment?   Have you not realised by now that this was all part of Correia's little game to embarrass Amaral?
Let me tell you how it works
If Stephen claims something is true he must post evidence to show it's true
You have admitted no offer was made
How could he have admitted it if no offer was made

Stephen also thinks he has posted court transcripts
He hasnt

Offline Mr Gray

To explain again

The claim is ridiculous because correia could not make such an offer
He had no power to make any sort of plea bargain
Is is so difficult to understand

Offline slartibartfast

To explain again

The claim is ridiculous because correia could not make such an offer
He had no power to make any sort of plea bargain
Is is so difficult to understand

As the lawyer representing a witness I am sure he would be able to coach his witness into into emphasising certain aspects and minimising others. From the cites posted this appears to be his suggestion.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline slartibartfast

What?

Kate and Gerry were offered a deal.

What erroneous line of non-'reasoning' pretends otherwise?

As Davel reasoning says further up, if the lawyer wasn't able to offer a deal, a deal cannot have been offered.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

stephen25000

  • Guest
As Davel reasoning says further up, if the lawyer wasn't able to offer a deal, a deal cannot have been offered.

Evidently, Correia had no power so make such an offer, but his history of being a fantasist tends to imply he was totally deluded.

It does not mean however, he didn't make the offer to the 4 PJ officers.


ferryman

  • Guest
As Davel reasoning says further up, if the lawyer wasn't able to offer a deal, a deal cannot have been offered.

You have posted an outright falsehood, also a lie if you know it to be false.

stephen25000

  • Guest
You have posted an outright falsehood, also a lie if you know it to be false.

It is illegal in Portugal for 'a deal'.

So, ferryman, what does that say in relation to your comment ?
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 12:01:05 PM by stephen25000 »

ferryman

  • Guest
It is illegal in Portugal for 'a deal'.

So, ferryman, what does that in relation to your comment ?

So the PJ broke Portuguese law?

Is that what you're saying?

stephen25000

  • Guest
So the PJ broke Portuguese law?

Is that what you're saying?

???

ferryman

  • Guest

stephen25000

  • Guest
You made the claim.

Philomena Mccann made the claim of a deal.