Método 3, Marcos Aragão Correia and the campaign to discredit Gonçalo Amaral.

[stephen25000]

So who did he have contact with ?

[Mr Gray]

So who did he have contact with ?

According to Angelo their lawyer
And I'm not even convinced by that
Try reading angelos posts

[stephen25000]

It does not matter one wit, whether you are convinced or not.

It was recorded in court during the trial.

Correia is a fantasist.

In fact, quite deluded.

Likewise, Correia has not denied his approach in making the offer.

[Mr Gray]

It does not matter one wit, whether you are convinced or not.

It was recorded in court during the trial.

Correia is a fantasist.

In fact, quite deluded.

Likewise, Correia has not denied his approach in making the offer.

It was not recorded in court during the trial
That makes you deluded
I know exactly what you are referring to
And it is NOT a court transcript

[Mr Gray]

It does not matter one wit, whether you are convinced or not.

It was recorded in court during the trial.

Correia is a fantasist.

In fact, quite deluded.

Likewise, Correia has not denied his approach in making the offer.

Cite for recorded in court
There isn't one
But it seems that mods have decided that the forum rules have changed having failed to provide cites themselves

[stephen25000]

Your comments are irrelevant.

Now when did Correia deny trying to broker a deal with the 4 officers, or any of their legal representatives ?

CITE.

[Mr Gray]

Your comments are irrelevant.

Now when did Correia deny trying to broker a deal with the 4 officers, or any of their legal representatives ?

CITE.

Monty python lol

[John]

The following extract is from an article published several weeks before the PJ inspector's trial.


By Pedro Coelho/SIC

13 Feb 2009

Paulo Pereira Cristovão, a former PJ inspector and one of the 5 arguidos of Faro accuses Marcos Aragão Correia of trying to make a 'deal' with the defendants."And that deal was: all of you incriminate Gonçalo Amaral and I’ll arrange so that Leonor Cipriano says that you have nothing to do with this – well, deals like this, only in Hollywood", ironizes Pereira Cristovão.

Marcos Aragão Correia does not deny the existence of such a deal, he even alleges that the deal was related with a "confidence made by one of the arguidos" that had reached his ears. "That defendant send an e-mail to a friend of mine where he pointed Gonçalo Amaral as being guilty", denounces the lawyer.

Marcos Aragão Correia confesses that the negative opinion about the way that Gonçalo Amaral investigated the cases of Maddie and Joana, is not shared alone with the Método 3, hired by the McCann couple. The lawyer feeds the enigma: "If I am taking sides for one of the parties, it is obvious that that side is giving me moral support".

Aragão Correia does not clarify who is in fact behind this puzzle: "The secrecy of the contract which bounds me to Método 3 stops me from revealing details regarding the private investigation", concludes.

Contacted by the SIC, Método 3 decided not to give any statements. Nevertheless the McCann family spokesman alleges that the family does not comment issues that they consider to be negative.


http://sicnoticias.sapo.pt/programas/reportagemsic/2009-02-13-detectives-contratados-pelos-mccann-quiseram-tramar-goncalo-amaral

[Mr Gray]

The following extract is from an article published several weeks before the PJ inspector's trial.


By Pedro Coelho/SIC

13 Feb 2009

Paulo Pereira Cristovão, a former PJ inspector and one of the 5 arguidos of Faro accuses Marcos Aragão Correia of trying to make a 'deal' with the defendants."And that deal was: all of you incriminate Gonçalo Amaral and I’ll arrange so that Leonor Cipriano says that you have nothing to do with this – well, deals like this, only in Hollywood", ironizes Pereira Cristovão.

Marcos Aragão Correia does not deny the existence of such a deal, he even alleges that the deal was related with a "confidence made by one of the arguidos" that had reached his ears. "That defendant send an e-mail to a friend of mine where he pointed Gonçalo Amaral as being guilty", denounces the lawyer.

Marcos Aragão Correia confesses that the negative opinion about the way that Gonçalo Amaral investigated the cases of Maddie and Joana, is not shared alone with t Método 3, hired by the McCann couple. The lawyer feeds the enigma: "If I am taking sides for one of the parties, it is obvious that that side is giving me moral support".

Aragão Correia does not clarify who is in fact behind this puzzle: "The secrecy of the contract which bounds me to Método 3 stops me from revealing details regarding the private investigation", concludes.

Contacted by the SIC, Método 3 decided not to give any statements. Nevertheless the McCann family spokesman alleges that the family does not comment issues that they consider to be negative.


http://sicnoticias.sapo.pt/programas/reportagemsic/2009-02-13-detectives-contratados-pelos-mccann-quiseram-tramar-goncalo-amaral

Published where John

This seems to be accepting the word of christovao a known crook

And again how could correia offer a deal
It would be impossible

Importantly was this published in a recognised newspaper

[John]

Published where John

This seems to be accepting the word of christovao a known crook

And again how could correia offer a deal
It would be impossible

Importantly was this published in a recognised newspaper

I suggest you read it again and in particular the part in bold text starting "Marcos Aragão Correia does not deny..."

[Mr Gray]

I suggest you read it again and in particular the part in bold text starting "Marcos Aragão Correia does not deny..."

The pope hasn't denied he's gay

[Mr Gray]

I suggest you read it again and in particular the part in bold text starting "Marcos Aragão Correia does not deny..."

I have read it and I noticed something that everyone else seems to have missed

[John]

"Aragao Correia needs to be hospitalised"
 
Goncalo Amaral suggests that the attorney suffers from psychiatric problems




By Duarte Baiao
07 February 2009
 
The former Inspector of the Policia Judiciária in Portimao confirmed he will proceed with a lawsuit against Marcos Aragao Correia and suggested that the attorney suffers from psychological problems. He also reaffirmed that he is not an arguido for torture against Leandro Silva

Goncalo Amaral suggested yesterday, in statements to 24horas, that Marcos Aragao Correia, lawyer for Leonor Cipriano, suffers from a psychiatric illness. This is another episode of verbal war between the ex-inspector of police in Portimao and the lawyer.

"Friends of mine who are connected to medicine, with whom I have spoken, tell me that Aragao Correia is in need of being compulsorily admitted. I think that says it all," said Goncalo Amaral. "For me, it is not as a person, but only as a lawyer," said the former inspector.

That the lawyer has said that the former inspector has been constituted an arguido by the Public Ministry, due to the practice of alleged crimes of torture against Leandro Silva, husband of Leonor Cipriano, Goncalo Amaral was peremptory: "No comment because everything is false. I will move with a case (against Aragao Correia). When? Inside the legally established period, that is, I have six months to do so."
 
The quest to be the leading character
 
The former inspector of the PJ is to be judged in a case where Leonor Cipriano, mother of Joana, guarantees to have been tortured on the premises of the PJ in order to admit the death of her daughter and the place where the corpse was hidden. In this case, Amaral is charged with failing to denounce. However, Marcos Aragao Correia wants to prove the veracity of the thesis of torture.
 
"Mr Aragao Correia has a goal, and that is the demand to be the leading character in the limelight. But he also knows that he follows the Order of Lawyers [Bar Association]. I will deal with the case by that establishment, I will deal with the case in court and, I stress, if necessary with a compulsory internment, and that, it seems, is what that man requires," concluded Goncalo Amaral.
 
24horas tried to talk to Aragao Correia, but he has remained uncontactable.

[Alfie]

"Aragao Correia needs to be hospitalised"
 
Goncalo Amaral suggests that the attorney suffers from psychiatric problems




By Duarte Baiao
07 February 2009
 
The former Inspector of the Policia Judiciária in Portimao confirmed he will proceed with a lawsuit against Marcos Aragao Correia and suggested that the attorney suffers from psychological problems. He also reaffirmed that he is not an arguido for torture against Leandro Silva

Goncalo Amaral suggested yesterday, in statements to 24horas, that Marcos Aragao Correia, lawyer for Leonor Cipriano, suffers from a psychiatric illness. This is another episode of verbal war between the ex-inspector of police in Portimao and the lawyer.

"Friends of mine who are connected to medicine, with whom I have spoken, tell me that Aragao Correia is in need of being compulsorily admitted. I think that says it all," said Goncalo Amaral. "For me, it is not as a person, but only as a lawyer," said the former inspector.

That the lawyer has said that the former inspector has been constituted an arguido by the Public Ministry, due to the practice of alleged crimes of torture against Leandro Silva, husband of Leonor Cipriano, Goncalo Amaral was peremptory: "No comment because everything is false. I will move with a case (against Aragao Correia). When? Inside the legally established period, that is, I have six months to do so."
 
The quest to be the leading character
 
The former inspector of the PJ is to be judged in a case where Leonor Cipriano, mother of Joana, guarantees to have been tortured on the premises of the PJ in order to admit the death of her daughter and the place where the corpse was hidden. In this case, Amaral is charged with failing to denounce. However, Marcos Aragao Correia wants to prove the veracity of the thesis of torture.
 
"Mr Aragao Correia has a goal, and that is the demand to be the leading character in the limelight. But he also knows that he follows the Order of Lawyers [Bar Association]. I will deal with the case by that establishment, I will deal with the case in court and, I stress, if necessary with a compulsory internment, and that, it seems, is what that man requires," concluded Goncalo Amaral.
 
24horas tried to talk to Aragao Correia, but he has remained uncontactable.

Shouldn't this be on a new thread entitled "Amaral and his campaign to discredit Aragao Correia"?

[misty]

I have read it and I noticed something that everyone else seems to have missed

Is that because, by saying Amaral was responsible, the other defendants would be admitting their own part in the torture? (Leonor had already admitted she couldn't identify her torturers)