Author Topic: The nature of the crime has not been proven...  (Read 22493 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« on: November 02, 2014, 07:30:19 PM »
The nature of the crime has not been proven but the most logical scenario is stranger abduction and not coincidentally that is the view of the Met who have said they believe Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger.  This isn't a believer's invention or fantasy, this is a fact.  Like it or lump it.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2014, 02:32:47 PM by Mr Moderator »

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2014, 07:34:33 PM »
In April this year, Andy Redwood, from the Homicide and Serious Crime Division at Scotland Yard, said he believed Madeleine McCann was abducted by a stranger and could be alive. "We sincerely believe that there is a possibility of her being alive", he stated.

But then, what does he know ...

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2014, 07:37:16 PM »
The nature of the crime has not been proven but the most logical scenario is stranger abduction and not coincidentally that is the view of the Met who have said they believe Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger.  This isn't a believer's invention or fantasy, this is a fact.  Like it or lump it.
Start the thread Alfie on how the child was abducted by a stranger.
Give us your theory from alpha to omega.
The Met have never said they are investigating abduction by stranger to the exclusion of all else.
Oh sorry I forgot you have me on ignore  8(>((
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2014, 07:41:07 PM »
Start the thread Alfie on how the child was abducted by a stranger.
Give us your theory from alpha to omega.
The Met have never said they are investigating abduction by stranger to the exclusion of all else.
Oh sorry I forgot you have me on ignore  8(>((

None (of us!) know all the information in the domain of the present joint enquiry.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2014, 07:41:48 PM »
Start the thread Alfie on how the child was abducted by a stranger.
Give us your theory from alpha to omega.
The Met have never said they are investigating abduction by stranger to the exclusion of all else.
Oh sorry I forgot you have me on ignore  8(>((

oh dear you are starting to sound like Stephen...abduction would have been very easy...its a simple as that..

the Met have said the are investigating a stranger abduction....no matter which way you spin it.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2014, 07:49:44 PM »
oh dear you are starting to sound like Stephen...abduction would have been very easy...its a simple as that..

the Met have said the are investigating a stranger abduction....no matter which way you spin it.

So simple and easy that you can't explain it....
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2014, 07:50:56 PM »
So simple and easy that you can't explain it....

it was explained in the despatches programme

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2014, 07:58:18 PM »
oh dear you are starting to sound like Stephen...abduction would have been very easy...its a simple as that..

the Met have said the are investigating a stranger abduction....no matter which way you spin it.
Yup.  The "sceptics" conveniently gloss over this fact, or delude themselves into thinking that when the Met say Black they really mean White.  It's terribly sad to witness such delusion amongst these so called "warriors for justice".  In fact they really remind me of those saddos who go up a mountain once a year having predicted the End Of Days, only to then traipse back down again a few days later, still confidently and optimistically predicting that the End of Days is going to happen soon, tick-tock, just you wait and see etc etc.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2014, 07:59:29 PM »
None (of us!) know all the information in the domain of the present joint enquiry.

I agree ; so why do some post with the suggestion The Met are only  investigating abduction by stranger?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2014, 07:59:40 PM »
absolute rubbish...they said an abduction would have been very easy

No it's true, they didn't include the window/shutters in their abduction theses....
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2014, 07:59:48 PM »
Yup.  The "sceptics" conveniently gloss over this fact, or delude themselves into thinking that when the Met say Black they really mean White.  It's terribly sad to witness such delusion amongst these so called "warriors for justice".  In fact they really remind me of those saddos who go up a mountain once a year having predicted the End Of Days, only to then traipse back down again a few days later, still confidently and optimistically predicting that the End of Days is going to happen soon, tick-tock, just you wait and see etc etc.

very well put Alfred

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2014, 08:03:34 PM »
Make that a few and I will agree.

Is there such a thing as consequential twaddle?
Only when using Twaddle as a measure of causticity I suspect.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2014, 08:04:24 PM »
Yup.  The "sceptics" conveniently gloss over this fact, or delude themselves into thinking that when the Met say Black they really mean White.  It's terribly sad to witness such delusion amongst these so called "warriors for justice".  In fact they really remind me of those saddos who go up a mountain once a year having predicted the End Of Days, only to then traipse back down again a few days later, still confidently and optimistically predicting that the End of Days is going to happen soon, tick-tock, just you wait and see etc etc.

Well we've had 7 years of 'abduction' and not one piece of evidence to prove it.

Tick-Tock indeed.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2014, 08:05:53 PM »
In April this year, Andy Redwood, from the Homicide and Serious Crime Division at Scotland Yard, said he believed Madeleine McCann was abducted by a stranger and could be alive. "We sincerely believe that there is a possibility of her being alive", he stated.

But then, what does he know ...

Well judging by the 'results' ?............

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: The nature of the crime has not been proven...
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2014, 08:13:01 PM »
I agree ; so why do some post with the suggestion The Met are only  investigating abduction by stranger?

Because that's what the Met says.

And because the first enquiry was shelved with no evidence pointing to the guilt of the McCanns or any of their friends.

In fact, it was shelved with nothing at all.