Author Topic: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.  (Read 79113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #75 on: November 30, 2014, 06:04:29 PM »
Maddie was worth much more than that, what with her bloodline.

Besides, 'Mr Big Fish Head' would have thrown them all to the dogs.

Is this the second coming 'bloodline' ?

 *&*%£

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #76 on: November 30, 2014, 06:20:19 PM »
But of course so was Rebelo, the coordinator who requested that a reconstruction be carried out and that the Gaspar statements were sent to him along with analysis by British police of questionnaires completed by both David Payne and his wife. They don't talk about him though. I wonder why ?
Rebelo was half-decent compared to Amaral, which isn't saying much really.  He might have called for a reconstruction earlier had he been in charge from the beginning, which may have been a bit more helpful, and he was right to ask for  the Gaspar statements, which presumably he analysed investigated and dismissed as irrelevant.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #77 on: November 30, 2014, 06:22:15 PM »
'Back (patio) door

'The patio door at the rear was unlocked and used by the McCanns and their friends to enter for child-checks.  There were walls and mature shrubbery which could have provided an intruder with cover so that he could make his way from the road to the apartment door unobserved (as well as hide until ready to make his move).'


No mention of the gate at the top of the stairs.

How extraordinary!

Well, it was closed, as were the curtains, & the patio door.

Unless Kate was lying about that, as opposed to the window & shutters being open, which, by her own good word, she wasn't lying about.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=WLvnfcl-Zkg#t=1371
All very fascinating but hardly the beginnings of a rebuttal.  What exactly are you driving at?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #78 on: November 30, 2014, 06:24:48 PM »
The PDL kidnapping crew eh, a receptionist, her husband, gardener, property developer, bus driver beggar & burglars, all conspired to abduct Maddie & have kept it a secret for the past 7 years.

Yep, I can go with that.
You really are a tw...  I'm not sure if that costs a 10% or a 40% warning, but whatever it is, you're worth it  8**8:/:

Offline pathfinder73

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #79 on: November 30, 2014, 06:28:05 PM »
Is this the second coming 'bloodline' ?

 *&*%£

The Mysterious Stoned Knights from the Twin Peak Blue Nipple Mountains are behind it. Big Fish is small fry!
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #80 on: November 30, 2014, 06:29:23 PM »
The Mysterious Stoned Knights from the Twin Peak Blue Nipple Mountains are behind it. Big Fish is small fry!
Hang on a minute.  I thought this was "A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail" - I don't recall mentioning any of the above before...?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #81 on: November 30, 2014, 06:30:30 PM »
The Mysterious Stoned Knights from the Twin Peak Blue Nipple Mountains are behind it. Big Fish is small fry!

Add to that the rancid violet butterflies of Tau Ceti III.

 @)(++(*

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #82 on: November 30, 2014, 06:32:32 PM »
All very fascinating but hardly the beginnings of a rebuttal.  What exactly are you driving at?

So you really are sticking with the polite paedo/abductor/murderer, as a possibility then.

Right'o.

Wanna buy some magic beans?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #83 on: November 30, 2014, 06:33:20 PM »
So you really are sticking with the polite paedo/abductor/murderer, as a possibility then.

Right'o.

Wanna buy some magic beans?

Is Jack around ?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #84 on: November 30, 2014, 06:37:23 PM »
Hang on a minute.  I thought this was "A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail" - I don't recall mentioning any of the above before...?

Oh sorry must have missed your theory?  What is it? Why was the window open?
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline misty

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #85 on: November 30, 2014, 06:39:28 PM »
Is Jack around ?

Back to my question, Stephen. You may get away with being deflective & evasive elsewhere......

Offline Wonderfulspam

Christian Brueckner Fan Club

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #87 on: November 30, 2014, 06:46:01 PM »
Stop sidestepping questions relating to the abduction theory which is the topic of this thread.
No theory has been proven or disproven yet.
As to questioning the McCanns, are you really as dense as your question?

Are you dense in supporting an abduction, which has no supporting evidence, and without which only leaves the mccanns ?

As to the mccanns, pray tell when were they questioned by SY ?

Are you too dense to answer that ?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #88 on: November 30, 2014, 06:52:18 PM »
You really are a tw...  I'm not sure if that costs a 10% or a 40% warning, but whatever it is, you're worth it  8**8:/:

What's the matter, darling?

Have I upset you again, precious?

Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline misty

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #89 on: November 30, 2014, 06:55:47 PM »
Are you dense in supporting an abduction, which has no supporting evidence, and without which only leaves the mccanns ?

As to the mccanns, pray tell when were they questioned by SY ?

Are you too dense to answer that ?

The first people to be questioned by SY would have been the McCanns & their holiday group as they were the centre of the investigation.
The primary evidence to support an abduction is that Madeleine went missing in a manner unknown to her parents & all subsequent efforts to trace her have proved fruitless so far. Her bedroom window/shutters had also been tampered with by person(s) unknown.
If there was no abduction, why do so many people in PdL have so much to hide?