Author Topic: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.  (Read 79054 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Benice

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #195 on: December 07, 2014, 09:29:02 AM »
Do you reckon this abductoress would have opened the window before picking Maddie up?

Or does she open it with one arm, whilst holding Maddie with the other?

IMO It would be the first thing to be done on entering the room -  before making any approach at all to Madeleine.

If as Colom suggests, Madeleine was persuaded that she was going to see her parents, she may not have been picked up at all in the bedroom and could have walked to the front door herself.

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #196 on: December 07, 2014, 09:40:29 AM »
IMO It would be the first thing to be done on entering the room -  before making any approach at all to Madeleine.

If as Colom suggests, Madeleine was persuaded that she was going to see her parents, she may not have been picked up at all in the bedroom and could have walked to the front door herself.

It wouldn't happen, is the correct answer.

You'd go in with your key, pick 'er up & then take 'er straight out the same door you just came in.

Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline sadie

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #197 on: December 07, 2014, 10:54:53 AM »
Most people sadie, will think your theories  several pence short of a pound coin.

Now, as you haven't spelt out your theory, but if if's anything likes nessling's, is completely skew whiffed, and can be challenged even at a basic level. Now for example, as you believe in abduction, why didn't an 'abductor' take Madeleine's younger sister, who was smaller , easier to carry and had the same genetic bloodline as her older sibling ?
I have never speculated that they took her for her bloodline, although I suppose that is possible.

My thoughts are that she was abducted as a pretty vivacious little girl, probably for nefarious reasons

But I am thinking they then found that she was from a certain [probably noble] bloodline group, their own in fact ... and they were forbidden by their own bloodline rules from harming her. 

I think that in many material ways she has been well looked after.  And I hope so.


Please do not interpret what I have said incorrectly.

Offline sadie

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #198 on: December 07, 2014, 11:03:43 AM »
Is that why Redwood came up with his moment of illumination by creating the CRECHEDAD?
This way, if you assume that Madeleine was totally alone in the apt from 8:30 until 22:00 (we can presume that Gerald didn't go for a pee), so a pervert could get inside murder the child and take her out after a considerable period of time.

Your hypothesis doesn't have much support though.
Err?

What you are saying doesn't make any sense at all, as far as i can see.
Can you explain it better please Luz


Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #200 on: December 07, 2014, 11:09:59 AM »
I have never speculated that they took her for her bloodline, although I suppose that is possible.

My thoughts are that she was abducted as a pretty vivacious little girl, probably for nefarious reasons

But I am thinking they then found that she was from a certain [probably noble] bloodline group, their own in fact ... and they were forbidden by their own bloodline rules from harming her. 

I think that in many material ways she has been well looked after.  And I hope so.


Please do not interpret what I have said incorrectly.

Sadie can you explain how the abductors found out that Madeleine was one of their bloodline ? Are you suggesting that of all the young children they could have abducted they choose a child who, purely by chance, was of their bloodline ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline sadie

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #201 on: December 07, 2014, 11:16:31 AM »
Is that why Redwood came up with his moment of illumination by creating the CRECHEDAD?
This way, if you assume that Madeleine was totally alone in the apt from 8:30 until 22:00 (we can presume that Gerald didn't go for a pee), so a pervert could get inside murder the child and take her out after a considerable period of time.

Your hypothesis doesn't have much support though.
Why are you propagating myths Luz?

Dont forget, the waiters support the Tapas groups claims about the parent leaving their meals regularly to go somewhere, which they subsequently realised was to check their children


I think we can safely accept that the parents visited their children as claimed.  Please do not start myths.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #202 on: December 07, 2014, 12:36:33 PM »
I have never speculated that they took her for her bloodline, although I suppose that is possible.

My thoughts are that she was abducted as a pretty vivacious little girl, probably for nefarious reasons

But I am thinking they then found that she was from a certain [probably noble] bloodline group, their own in fact ... and they were forbidden by their own bloodline rules from harming her. 

I think that in many material ways she has been well looked after.  And I hope so.


Please do not interpret what I have said incorrectly.

I'm all ears sadie.

What noble bloodline are you referring to ?

Facts please.

and why wouldn't an abductor take her younger sister ?

After all , she has the same bloodline.

Offline sadie

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #203 on: December 07, 2014, 01:15:56 PM »
I'm all ears sadie.

What noble bloodline are you referring to ?

Facts please.

and why wouldn't an abductor take her younger sister ?

After all , she has the same bloodline.

I am not going to be tied down to any specific bloodline.  I am not in the business of naming people.  I have made that clear before.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #204 on: December 07, 2014, 01:28:41 PM »
I am not going to be tied down to any specific bloodline.  I am not in the business of naming people.  I have made that clear before.

Then it is meaningless.

and you didn't answer the second question, yet again.

Offline colombosstogey

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #205 on: December 07, 2014, 01:52:44 PM »
I'm all ears sadie.

What noble bloodline are you referring to ?

Facts please.

and why wouldn't an abductor take her younger sister ?

After all , she has the same bloodline.

OMG I think i am in the twighlight zone lol.....

Bloodlines well i suppose she was created with IVF, so perhaps one of the royals had been moonlighting at the sperm bank.....?

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #206 on: December 07, 2014, 01:54:23 PM »
Sadie can you explain how the abductors found out that Madeleine was one of their bloodline ? Are you suggesting that of all the young children they could have abducted they choose a child who, purely by chance, was of their bloodline ?

Bump
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #207 on: December 07, 2014, 02:11:52 PM »
It wouldn't happen, is the correct answer.

You'd go in with your key, pick 'er up & then take 'er straight out the same door you just came in.

That's far too easy WS - quickly in and out job done. Instead they waste time they haven't got by telling the whole world, 'here we are,' by opening shutters and a window in the night like it's normal before anyone has even been abducted *&*%£
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #208 on: December 07, 2014, 04:12:25 PM »
That's far too easy WS - quickly in and out job done. Instead they waste time they haven't got by telling the whole world, 'here we are,' by opening shutters and a window in the night like it's normal before anyone has even been abducted *&*%£

You beat me to it! I was about to say something similar. After all why make it simple when it is so easy to complicate matters? Making it complicated is the true sign of a master criminal; only a rank amateur would go for a simple plan  &%+((£
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline sadie

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #209 on: December 07, 2014, 04:44:34 PM »
Bump
I am not going to be tied down to any specific bloodline.  I am not in the business of naming people.  I have made that clear before.

Lets be absolutely clear on that.