Author Topic: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.  (Read 78995 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #315 on: December 09, 2014, 08:56:49 AM »
Perhaps Faithlilly can tell us whether the letter purporting to be from the Stud Muffin is genuine or not?

Unfortunately Alfie I know nothing of Blacksmith's email correspondence. I merely worship from afar !
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #316 on: December 09, 2014, 09:22:16 AM »
What's a Stud Muffin?

Sorry, Off Topic.  But I just have to know.

A philanderer, so far as I can tell ...

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #317 on: December 09, 2014, 03:06:46 PM »

Saturday, 5 February 2011
Time for a change
From: (Blacksmith)
Sent: 05 February 2011 11:47
To: (XXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
Subject: The Blacksmith Bureau

No 'from' or 'to' details supplied !!
Sounds like one of those 'my sisters hairdressers friend, knows a top cop in Scotland Yard who said at a party last week thrown by her brothers best friends uncle that The McCanns are guilty'

Absolute bolleaux unless someone is willing to put their name to it !

Edited to add - as are most of the 'theories' on here !
You really should read back on your own posts to see the ridiculousness of some of the 'theories' purported !
Blue nippled Moroccan transvestites connected to international drug smuggling lines is my all time favourite (not forgetting the fabled 'bloodline' !!
Furthermore to have members who I have a modicum of respect for sit idly by twiddling their thumbs and not questioning these grotesque mental imaginings leads me to believe that so called 'supporters' don't possess the backbone to call time on same ! OR maybe I'm wrong, maybe you all actually agree that those ramblings are a possibility ?

Can't imagine any one of you will be bold enough to stand up and say its bolleaux somehow !

C'mon the dry run recce idea takes some beating; coupled with the idea it involved spotty pimply beer bellied smelly chuggers with which PdL seemed to be awash. Do you think that week, as it was really early doors in the season, there was a convention of these types in PdL? It would explain why there were so many don't you think?

S'cuse me must be off it's time for tea and gattocks (or should it be gatocks?)
« Last Edit: December 09, 2014, 04:28:36 PM by Alice Purjorick »
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Brietta

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #318 on: December 09, 2014, 04:52:02 PM »

Saturday, 5 February 2011
Time for a change
From: (Blacksmith)
Sent: 05 February 2011 11:47
To: (XXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
Subject: The Blacksmith Bureau

No 'from' or 'to' details supplied !!
Sounds like one of those 'my sisters hairdressers friend, knows a top cop in Scotland Yard who said at a party last week thrown by her brothers best friends uncle that The McCanns are guilty'

Absolute bolleaux unless someone is willing to put their name to it !

Edited to add - as are most of the 'theories' on here !
You really should read back on your own posts to see the ridiculousness of some of the 'theories' purported !
Blue nippled Moroccan transvestites connected to international drug smuggling lines is my all time favourite (not forgetting the fabled 'bloodline' !!
Furthermore to have members who I have a modicum of respect for sit idly by twiddling their thumbs and not questioning these grotesque mental imaginings leads me to believe that so called 'supporters' don't possess the backbone to call time on same ! OR maybe I'm wrong, maybe you all actually agree that those ramblings are a possibility ?

Can't imagine any one of you will be bold enough to stand up and say its bolleaux somehow !

Is it an idiosyncratic form of Muslim dress in Morrocco to have one's nipples highlighted in blue? or are you saying that the person photographed in Morrocco wasn't displaying blue nipples through a white shirt?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline lordpookles

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #319 on: December 10, 2014, 02:00:00 AM »
.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2014, 02:14:04 AM by lordpookles »

Offline TitoMuzzy

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #320 on: December 10, 2014, 02:04:11 AM »
Is it an idiosyncratic form of Muslim dress in Morrocco to have one's nipples highlighted in blue? or are you saying that the person photographed in Morrocco wasn't displaying blue nipples through a white shirt?

Do you also subscribe to the theory that the 'woman' in the photo could be a man ?

Offline TitoMuzzy

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #321 on: December 10, 2014, 02:30:25 AM »
I'm not on a crusade, sounds like you are?

Really? What gave you that impression ? Please do elaborate !

Why waste your energy?

I'm not wasting energy, merely asking a civil question !

Is it going to change the outcome of this case or stop the truth coming out if we all come on a forum and rip the piss out of someone?

Do you seriously need to ask that question ? Shame on you if you do !

 Personally I think there is something to be said for silence.

I agree with you, as I'm sure Kate McCann would also !

 Anyway the blue nippled variety of transvestites are quite often alien pychopaths according to this dude who made a 4hour documentary recently about the McCanns

Who is "this dude" and where is the link to his documentary ?

- so maybe Madeline has been abducted and lives on planet McMong now?

Are you posing a question here ? If not can you point me to the "planet McMong" please ! P.S. It's Madeleine, not Madeline !

That's my theory.

Mmmmmmmm, not really a theory is it ?

Also, anyone who fakes an email by the internet hero Blacksmith needs to get a life.

And you can pontificate to others to "get a life" how ?

Offline lordpookles

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #322 on: December 10, 2014, 02:43:11 AM »
You resurrected my post.

The dude is here.

http://www.richplanet.net

As you were talking about bloodline theories I thought on the other side of the fence I should mention this guy who made a McCann documentary. He's also made some other interesting documentaries...

Offline TitoMuzzy

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #323 on: December 10, 2014, 02:48:33 AM »
You resurrected my post.

The dude is here.

http://www.richplanet.net

As you were talking about bloodline theories I thought on the other side of the fence I should mention this guy who made a McCann documentary. He's also made some other interesting documentaries...

I don't normally hand out this accolade but you are the recipient of 'The PLANK of the week' award !

Offline lordpookles

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #324 on: December 10, 2014, 02:56:10 AM »
I humbly accept this most prestigious award!

Merely pointing out there are enough warped imaginings going on on both sides. You simply mentioned the anti McCann ones...

Offline TitoMuzzy

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #325 on: December 10, 2014, 03:05:00 AM »
I humbly accept this most prestigious award!

Merely pointing out there are enough warped imaginings going on on both sides. You simply mentioned the anti McCann ones...

No, I merely replied to your post !

Offline Eleanor

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #326 on: December 10, 2014, 03:30:40 AM »
No, I merely replied to your post !

Just watch it.  You have no right to insult anyone.

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #327 on: December 10, 2014, 12:57:33 PM »
Just watch it.  You have no right to insult anyone.

* Irony klaxon *  @)(++(*
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #328 on: January 07, 2015, 10:40:37 AM »
it was you asked for detail, not I who volunteered to give it.  I'm not overly interested in going through the detail again for the eight millionth time, in any case I'm very happy to leave the detail as to the exact angle of the bedroom door and what physics are necessary to make a curtain whoosh, and whether the invisible lichen on the windowsill was disturbed or not to the experts and the pseudo experts.  As I've said before in my opinion (shared by the Met who I would class as experts), there was a window of opportunity for Madeleine to be taken from the apartment by a stranger.  it would have occurred sometime within a two-hour period when the apartment was unoccupied by adults.  As the apartment was unlocked and also a holiday let to which several people had had access to over the years and undoubtedly to which there was more than one set of keys, and it was on the ground floor, then gaining entrance to it would have been as easy as pie to anyone intent on it.  I think whoever took her (and maybe there were two or more individuals - I wouldn't rule it out) did so for sexual purposes (I really hope I'm wrong on this point) and I think she was likely abused and killed within a few hours of being removed (again, let's hope I'm wrong) and her remains are somewhere within a few mile radius of PdL.   

All the facts we know about this case seem to support the above, albeit in a circumstantial rather than in a "hard evidence" way, much more so than the "parents dunnit" theory.  That is my opinion. Holding that opinion no doubt makes me a deluded saddo / candle-waving drooling old dear/ McCann worshipper / child neglect supporter (delete as applicable) so feel free to mock and sneer at me freely but perhaps at the same time as mocking and sneering you could at least add to the discussion by letting us know why my opinion is completely and absurdly implausible / impossible.  I won't hold my breath as this is a troll thread started by a troll with no interest in actually challenging my opinion with anything resembling a reasonably-argued point.  So, until such a time as one is forth-coming, I've nothing further to add.

2 hour period?

That 2 hour period between Gerry seeing his daughter in bed around 9.00 & 9.50 when Kate raised the alarm,you mean?

Genius!

Where does the yards prime suspect fit into your theory?

Another innocent crechedad or do you lean towards the dadlike abductor/ paedo/murderer who changed Maddies pyjama top?
........

Bump!
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #329 on: January 07, 2015, 02:15:46 PM »
Spam, when did the Met announce that Smithman was their PRIME suspect? I thought they were keen to identify him, to either rule him in or rule him out. As far as I know the Met have done neither so he is still a person of interest to the investigation, but prime suspect...?   &%+((£