Author Topic: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.  (Read 20937 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« on: December 07, 2014, 02:25:51 AM »
The rule of Secrecy of Justice explained



By: JOÃO TABORDA (Head of the litigation department, Neville de Rougemont e Associados, Sociedade de Advogados)
17 May 2007

THE DISAPPEARANCE of four-year-old Madeleine McCann from her bed on Thursday, May 3, has touched us all in the past week. Much has been said about the Polícia Judiciária’s (PJ) investigation, the searches conducted by the police and the rule of Secrecy of Justice.The principle of Secrecy of Justice and the role of the PJ can be better understood if we put them in the context of the Portuguese criminal legal system.Thanks to American television, most of us are familiar with the system of criminal investigation in the US, in which state criminal prosecutions are conducted by the District Attorney’s Office.This office has at its disposal a department of criminal specialists in investigation, who prepare the court case, gather information, interview suspects and witnesses and prepare the People’s case against the Defendant, which will eventually be distributed to a selected prosecutor to prosecute in court on behalf of the People.InvestigationIn general, this system is similar to the Portuguese one. In Portugal, when a crime occurs, it is reported to the police authorities, either the Polícia de Segurança Pública (PSP) or the Guarda Nacional Republicana (GNR).The criminal complaint, once received by the police, is investigated briefly and on a preliminary basis by the PSP or GNR and then it is immediately referred to the local Public Prosecutor’s Office. From this moment on, the public prosecutor’s office takes full charge of the proceedings (much in the same way as the District Attorney’s Office in the US) and is assisted in its investigation by the PJ.The PSP, GNR and other security services can, in turn, be instructed by the PJ to assist in the investigation by, for example, conducting searches.No line of investigation or enquiry or search is performed by the PJ without the knowledge of the Public Prosecutor’s Office or without its permission or instruction.A Criminal Investigation Judge supervises all these proceedings and authorises, judicially, all the acts and orders given by the Public Prosecutor to the PJ namely where an arrest or search warrant is necessary.The Secrecy of Justice rule applies only during the investigation of the crime. Article 86 of the Portuguese Criminal Procedure Code states that all parties to the investigation are bound by a duty of secrecy. This duty of secrecy applies to all those connected to the investigation and to all those who have obtained knowledge of the investigation from the commencement of the investigation to the moment that the proceedings become public.Traditionally, the rule of Secrecy of Justice aims to guarantee the effectiveness of a criminal inquiry and a fair investigation and trial.More recently, this rule has been defended on the basis of the rights to privacy, to a good name and reputation of victims, defendants or other parties involved in criminal proceedings, and also on the basis of the presumption of innocence. For these reasons, the Portuguese Constitution includes under the chapter of Basic Rights the “Right to the Secrecy of Justice”.The rule can also be justified on the basis of protecting the gathering of evidence. Third parties knowing of prospective police action in gathering evidence could lead to its destruction or to the tampering with such evidence.MediaThe rule allows the investigation to follow its course undisturbed and prevents witnesses being coerced by the suspect or material evidence being compromised; therefore it is extremely important at the initial stage of investigation.The principle of secrecy, to a larger or lesser degree, is in use in police forces around the world including the British police. However, differences may lie in the way that other police forces, particularly in the US and the UK, use the media as a vehicle for spreading information with the objective of bringing new evidence to the investigation.The PJ, with authorisation of the Criminal Investigation Judge (JIC), can provide information to the media.  In addition, provision is made in Article 86 of the Portuguese Criminal Procedure Code for the PJ to provide the press with summary reports regarding the ongoing investigation specifically in order to prevent crime.ProtectiveAlso, it is not unusual for the PJ to ask for information through the media in particular cases. However, each police investigation is unique and requires more or less secrecy to gather evidence and make arrests. This does no mean that the PJ is failing to release information to the public for the sake of it - it only means that some information must be gathered more discreetly than other information.Care must be taken that information which is released would not, for example, compromise an investigation by alerting perpetrators of the PJ’s intentions or potential course of action.Although the physical search for Madeleine has been scaled down, the detective work is still ongoing. While the PJ may not have a media liaison department on the scale of the UK or US police, it has a good record in missing persons cases.The rule of secrecy of justice not only protects those who have been interviewed in the course of the investigation, particularly in such a high profile and emotive case such as this, but it also protects Madeleine’s parents from public scrutiny.Do you have a view on this story?

Email: editor@portugalresident.com

www.portugalresident.com/the-rule-of-secrecy-of-justice-explained


85
« Last Edit: December 28, 2014, 03:43:08 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Brietta

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2014, 11:09:17 AM »
It does seem to absolve Dr Amaral from the accusation of breaking the secrecy laws since it is obvious that his book bears no relation at all to what is in the PJ files and perhaps on occasion actually contradicts them.

Why is it there is never any mention of the Ace up his sleeve these days?  ... has it been played and I've missed it? ... was it the old lady in the coffin ... or has he got something else since that one didn't seem to catch on?
« Last Edit: December 15, 2014, 04:26:55 PM by John »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2014, 11:24:31 AM »
It does seem to absolve Dr Amaral from the accusation of breaking the secrecy laws since it is obvious that his book bears no relation at all to what is in the PJ files and perhaps on occasion actually contradicts them.

Why is it there is never any mention of the Ace up his sleeve these days?  ... has it been played and I've missed it? ... was it the old lady in the coffin ... or has he got something else since that one didn't seem to catch on?

Ah, couple of points there.

Breaching the secrecy laws is a criminal matter, not civil.

And Amaral breached the secrecy laws by airing material in writing his book.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2014, 11:31:07 AM »
Ah, couple of points there.

Breaching the secrecy laws is a criminal matter, not civil.

And Amaral breached the secrecy laws by airing material in writing his book.

And Tanner did by appearing on Panorama. So what exactly is your point ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Jean-Pierre

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2014, 11:38:10 AM »
And Tanner did by appearing on Panorama. So what exactly is your point ?

A moot point, faith.

Three questions.

Where was Tanner when she appeared on Panorama?

Where was Panorama aired?

Could you remind me of the "judicial secrecy" law that applies to the UK?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2014, 12:38:03 PM »
A moot point, faith.

Three questions.

Where was Tanner when she appeared on Panorama?

Where was Panorama aired?

Could you remind me of the "judicial secrecy" law that applies to the UK?

The McCanns claimed in several interviews in the UK before the archiving that they couldn't reveal details of Madeleine's disappearance as the case was under judicial secrecy. Are you saying he was wrong and if so would you mind posting a link to the piece of Portuguese legislation which proves your claim ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Jean-Pierre

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2014, 03:20:11 PM »
The McCanns claimed in several interviews in the UK before the archiving that they couldn't reveal details of Madeleine's disappearance as the case was under judicial secrecy. Are you saying he was wrong and if so would you mind posting a link to the piece of Portuguese legislation which proves your claim ?

No need to Faith, because it is irrelevant. 

The McCanns were arguidos and had given undertakings.  These included abiding by the penal code, and as such they were precluded from commenting on the case. 

Tanner was under no such obligation.  There is no law in the UK probibiting comment, or appearing in television programmes.  As a UK citizen, why would she be obliged to take any account of Portuguese law? 

Offline faithlilly

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2014, 03:49:12 PM »
No need to Faith, because it is irrelevant. 

The McCanns were arguidos and had given undertakings.  These included abiding by the penal code, and as such they were precluded from commenting on the case. 

Tanner was under no such obligation.  There is no law in the UK probibiting comment, or appearing in television programmes.  As a UK citizen, why would she be obliged to take any account of Portuguese law?

Again perhaps you can supply the piece of Portuguese legislation that proves your argument.

Tell me  if only arguidos are precluded from speaking it kind of makes nonsense of the faithful's claim that Amaral, as a private citizen, broke judicial secrecy by writing his book.

Further the faithful have always lead us to believe the 'pact' David Payne spoke about to a reporter was merely him explaining that they were under judicial secrecy. Were they wrong ?
« Last Edit: December 11, 2014, 04:13:37 PM by Faithlilly »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Jean-Pierre

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2014, 04:28:27 PM »
Again perhaps you can supply the piece of Portuguese legislation that proves your argument.

Tell me  if only arguidos are precluded from speaking it kind of makes nonsense of the faithful's claim that Amaral, as a private citizen, broke judicial secrecy by writing his book.

Further the faithful have always lead us to believe the 'pact' David Payne spoke about to a reporter was merely him explaining that they were under judicial secrecy. Were they wrong ?

I am not sure he did - he took care to release his book after the case was shelved.   It does appear that the PJ were happily leaking to the press whilst the case was in progress.

Under Portuguese law, judicial secrecy applied in Portugal.  And the McCanns were under various obligations as a result of the "arguido" status.

In the UK, Tanner was under no such obligation.

Who was it who asked Payne to comment and under what circumstances?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2014, 01:27:58 PM »
Did Jane Tanner break judicial secrecy rules by appearing on Panorama ? Jean-Pierre seems to think not because she was not an arguido. His compadre's among the faithful seem to disagree.




http://madeleinemythsexposed.pbworks.com/w/page/39077845/Rebuttal%20of%20%22Fact%22%2024

So who is correct ?
« Last Edit: December 14, 2014, 03:33:25 PM by John »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline John

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #10 on: December 14, 2014, 03:38:09 PM »
Since there was a live investigation up until 21July 2008 (date of shelving), I would have thought that any witnesses and/or arguidos who spoke publicly before that time were in danger of falling foul of Portuguese secrecy laws.

Since the BBC Panorama programme was aired on 19 November 2007, that sort of answers your question. 

« Last Edit: December 14, 2014, 03:44:01 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2014, 04:29:16 PM »
Since there was a live investigation up until 21July 2008 (date of shelving), I would have thought that any witnesses and/or arguidos who spoke publicly before that time were in danger of falling foul of Portuguese secrecy laws.

Since the BBC Panorama programme was aired on 19 November 2007, that sort of answers your question.

You would think so John. Obviously some do not agree.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #12 on: December 14, 2014, 04:35:00 PM »
Do Portuguese judicial secrecy laws apply in the UK as well?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2014, 04:48:21 PM »
Interesting:

This duty of secrecy applies to all those connected to the investigation and to all those who have obtained knowledge of the investigation from the commencement of the investigation to the moment that the proceedings become public.

But then the article suggests a slight softening from the ultra-prohibitive position of absolutely no information being imparted.

It seems to broadly in line with our own sub judice laws.


Offline faithlilly

Re: Portuguese judicial secrecy laws explained.
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2014, 05:02:22 PM »
Interesting:

This duty of secrecy applies to all those connected to the investigation and to all those who have obtained knowledge of the investigation from the commencement of the investigation to the moment that the proceedings become public.

But then the article suggests a slight softening from the ultra-prohibitive position of absolutely no information being imparted.

It seems to broadly in line with our own sub judice laws.

So I assume you agree that Tanner did break the judicial secrecy laws ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?