Why the abduction theory is both improbable and implausible...

[slartibartfast]

It's good to see so many sceptics agreeing with someone who doesn't (in his heart of hearts) believe that the McCanns dunnit! 

Apart from the fact that I may not agree with Lordpookies it was still a good post. It helps to have an open mind.

Sceptic or doubter implies not being certain, unlike believer.

[stephen25000]

Is that a fact?  Some sort of scientific law?  Who has snitched in the case of Ben Needham?  Claudia Lawrence?  Suzy Lamplugh?  Do tell.

Just provide evidence of abduction alfred that can stand up with reason and logic.

[stephen25000]

Eh?

Not in a death alfred.

The aftermath would be a different story.

[stephen25000]

No, I'm not kidding at all, why would I kid about a thing like that?

Why would an abductor carry a heavier child when a younger one was available and lighter to carry ?

[Alfred R Jones]

Just provide evidence of abduction alfred that can stand up with reason and logic.

Now you are deflecting again Stephen. You stated as fact that it can't be an abduction because someone would have snitched by now.  Is this a serious piece of evidence in your opinion as to why Madeleine was not abducted?  If so, perhaps you could explain why no one has "snitched" in the other cases I have mentioned - were they not abducted then?

[Alfred R Jones]

Why would an abductor carry a heavier child when a younger one was available and lighter to carry ?

I didn't realise kids were abducted according to how much they weigh.  I've heard it all now. 

[jassi]

Now you are deflecting again Stephen. You stated as fact that it can't be an abduction because someone would have snitched by now.  Is this a serious piece of evidence in your opinion as to why Madeleine was not abducted?  If so, perhaps you could explain why no one has "snitched" in the other cases I have mentioned - were they not abducted then?

Possibly not the the case of the two adults. They may well have gone off somewhere  willingly to meet someone, even if they were later killed, as is sadly likely.

[Alfred R Jones]

Possibly not the the case of the two adults. They may well have gone off somewhere  willingly to meet someone, even if they were later killed, as is sadly likely.

Kind of irrelevant.  Stephen claims that Madeleine could not have been taken without someone snitching.  Surely the same principle should apply in any case of a missing person whose fate is in the hands of other(s)?

[Alfred R Jones]

Possibly not the the case of the two adults. They may well have gone off somewhere  willingly to meet someone, even if they were later killed, as is sadly likely.

Incidentally: abducted: take (someone) away illegally by force or deception; kidnap.

So, if Claudia and Suzy were not abducted, then what would you call it?

[jassi]

Kind of irrelevant.  Stephen claims that Madeleine could not have been taken without someone snitching.  Surely the same principle should apply in any case of a missing person whose fate is in the hands of other(s)?

Only if more than one person knows.

[Alfred R Jones]

Only if more than one person knows.

1) we don't know how many people were involved in Madeleine's disappearance 2) there is no golden rule that says when more than one person is involved in a crime, at least one person will eventually snitch on the other. 

[stephen25000]

I didn't realise kids were abducted according to how much they weigh.  I've heard it all now.

Rollocks.

Who would be easier to carry., a small cild or larger, and garner less attention ?

[stephen25000]

Now alfred let's have some coherent and readoned evidence of abduction.

It's long overdue.

[Alice Purjorick]

Oh silly me ... is that not part and parcel of Mr Amaral's theory? ... I thought someone who agrees with it might be able to come up with a reason.
Obviously you do not deign to be that person.

Indeed, if you believe it is essential for all 9 to be complicit.

[mercury]

So are you too are agreeing that Madeleine may have been abducted?

I already said it is not implausible.