Are the McCanns too sensitive to alternative points of view?

[stephen25000]

I don't count chickens when it comes to the life of a child.  And yes, I do believe that there is a great possibility that Madeleine is still alive.

I don't believe in fairy stories of her return.

[Brietta]

It should have dawned on you by now that many people don't believe the mccanns story, and it has nothing to do with Amaral either.

What "story"?

Dr Kate McCann discovered Madeleine missing from her bed and the window she thought secure open.

 ... and that is enough to set up an industry of vilification?

[Mr Gray]

I accused them of having memories like sieves. I gave examples of inconsistences which are all documented.. Did I mention lying?

look at your post again...

[Mr Gray]

I accused them of having memories like sieves. I gave examples of inconsistences which are all documented.. Did I mention lying?

in my view the inconsistencies are in the translations

[misty]

The McCanns have shown themselves to be sensitive to alternative points of view when the opposition uses the shield of respectability from another person's campaign as they fire shots of abuse, or questions which they know cannot possibly be answered.
I believe if the McCanns hadn't closed their Twitter a/c, it would have been probable Kerry would have been forced to close hers.

[faithlilly]

The McCanns have shown themselves to be sensitive to alternative points of view when the opposition uses the shield of respectability from another person's campaign as they fire shots of abuse, or questions which they know cannot possibly be answered.
I believe if the McCanns hadn't closed their Twitter a/c, it would have been probable Kerry would have been forced to close hers.

Why would Kerry have been forced to close her Twitter account ?

[misty]

Why would Kerry have been forced to close her Twitter account ?

I suspect her account would have continued to have been used as a weapon against the McCanns and attracted the attention of the spambots.

[stephen25000]

I suspect her account would have continued to have been used as a weapon against the McCanns and attracted the attention of the spambots.

That is your 'perception' for obvious reasons.

[faithlilly]

I suspect her account would have continued to have been used as a weapon against the McCanns and attracted the attention of the spambots.

Her account wasn't being used as a weapon against the McCanns. What in heaven's name are you talking about ?

[Brietta]

You need to learn fact from fiction.

You said ... "It should have dawned on you by now that many people don't believe the mccanns story, and it has nothing to do with Amaral either."

I'm afraid your answer doesn't cut the mustard ~ much as your response to my original post bore absolutely relevance to that either.  You pepper the threads with allegations then refuse to back them up when asked to.

I need to learn nothing ... what you need to do rather than throwing insulting and goading OT comments around like confetti ... is to learn how to debate the points you raise with valid answers rather than lift one from your collection of one-liners.

I'm not even sure I could accuse you of having a reprehensible attitude towards the on-line abuse heaped on the Drs McCann which apparently they should be quite happy to accept ... because I can't remember you making a single relevant post on the subject.

[stephen25000]

You said ... "It should have dawned on you by now that many people don't believe the mccanns story, and it has nothing to do with Amaral either."

I'm afraid your answer doesn't cut the mustard ~ much as your response to my original post bore absolutely relevance to that either.  You pepper the threads with allegations then refuse to back them up when asked to.

I need to learn nothing ... what you need to do rather than throwing insulting and goading OT comments around like confetti ... is to learn how to debate the points you raise with valid answers rather than lift one from your collection of one-liners.

I'm not even sure I could accuse you of having a reprehensible attitude towards the on-line abuse heaped on the Drs McCann which apparently they should be quite happy to accept ... because I can't remember you making a single relevant post on the subject.

Irrelevant.

Your posts and views are completely biased by your support of the mccanns.

No one forces you to answer my posts.

That is your choice.

The mccanns version of events has yet to be tested in court.

Their accounts as are some of their associated, inconsistent.

No amount of exchanging views on here will change that.

[Brietta]

I suspect her account would have continued to have been used as a weapon against the McCanns and attracted the attention of the spambots.

One wonders where these people who have suddenly attached themselves to Ben's cause were over the years when Kerry was holding car boot sales to raise money for it?

[Mr Gray]

Irrelevant.

Your posts and views are completely biased by your support of the mccanns.

No one forces you to answer my posts.

That is your choice.

The mccanns version of events has yet to be tested in court.

Their accounts as are some of their associated, inconsistent.

No amount of exchanging views on here will change that.

the mccanns version of events have not been tested in court because they are accepted by SY and there is no evidence to take them to court

[Mr Gray]

I suspect her account would have continued to have been used as a weapon against the McCanns and attracted the attention of the spambots.

there is no doubt that some very vocal supporters of Kerry libel the mccanns on twitter...this is what is causing the problem

[Brietta]

Irrelevant.

Your posts and views are completely biased by your support of the mccanns.

No one forces you to answer my posts.

That is your choice.

The mccanns version of events has yet to be tested in court.

Their accounts as are some of their associated, inconsistent.

No amount of exchanging views on here will change that.

Might I respectfully point out  ... it was you who instituted 'discussion' by responding to my posts yesterday.  You also instituted 'discussion' today.

You make all encompassing statements which you then refuse to substantiate ... although I must admit the above misses out the usual accompanying ad homs.  Although it is still OT ... you can't seem to help yourself on that.

There must be some reason you can give either why the Drs McCann should be happy with the internet campaign mounted against them and their search for Madeleine.
Or like the normal human beings they are, admit they have the inalienable right to be heartily offended by it.