Your refusal to answer my original question which you quickly bypassed was followed by a predictable stance, namely trying to steer this and other threads to the place you always want everythng to end up, even the blind can see
No one is saying the Mccanns should be ecstatically happy with any abuse but not every comment is abuse.
Why the constant dramatics and the parroting of the FM webmaster's words? Such as toxicYou're not them are you?
As for your latest little project, namely, accusing people of attacking the missing but most likely dead child, if they dare question the parents, it has been tried before, it's puerile, it's irrational and has and always will fail
I think toxic is exactly the word of the moment which describes both the posters and the posts which have been directed at Madeleine and her family.
It is not mine ... I have merely borrowed it because it is so apt. The words I would use to describe these people are as numerous as the grains of sand on Praia da Luz beach ... each and every one of them would not be allowed to be used on the forum.
So for the time being toxic it is.
How strange it's use should be so significant you felt pressed to mention it.
If you cannot appreciate the intentionally deletrious significance of starting polls on the amount of money being spent on searching for Madeleine or organising a letter writing campaign to MPs objecting to the same ... that is not my problem.
Strange you should mention that Madeleine is " ... most likely dead child" ... how does that make the actions of these people appropriate when she may equally be very much alive?
