Author Topic: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website  (Read 126964 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #435 on: February 05, 2016, 01:32:30 PM »
"No idea" / "potential" quantified by a "third"

As I thought - utter speculation

 8((()*/

It is really easy to create multiple identities on the internet.  Which of course no-one of integrity would use for nefarious purposes.

I would reclassify "speculation   8((()*/"  as informed comment.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Carana

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #436 on: February 05, 2016, 02:03:09 PM »
Back to topic...

I've been through Blonk's "concerns" and I still don't understand what he finds suspicious.

ETA: Let alone qualifying Op Grange as a sham / charade / farce.

« Last Edit: February 05, 2016, 02:07:12 PM by Carana »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #437 on: February 05, 2016, 04:59:24 PM »
Back to topic...

I've been through Blonk's "concerns" and I still don't understand what he finds suspicious.

ETA: Let alone qualifying Op Grange as a sham / charade / farce.
Has he whose identity is known to all, but whose ID must never be mentioned by any other member apart from himself explained yet why the government has shelled out £12m to protect a couple of doctors from Rothley?  Is it to do with nuclear energy, or the Jews?

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #438 on: February 05, 2016, 05:09:32 PM »
Has he whose identity is known to all, but whose ID must never be mentioned by any other member apart from himself explained yet why the government has shelled out £12m to protect a couple of doctors from Rothley?  Is it to do with nuclear energy, or the Jews?

More like just because they could. They threw £46MM at Kids Company. £3MM of that in the full knowledge it was going bust within a matter of days.
I wouldn't look for a pattern of logic or business acumen.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #439 on: February 05, 2016, 05:20:33 PM »
More like just because they could. They threw £46MM at Kids Company. £3MM of that in the full knowledge it was going bust within a matter of days.
I wouldn't look for a pattern of logic or business acumen.
I was rather hoping "Blonk" would respond with his rationale, I'm not overly interested in yours, no offence like.

Offline Carana

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #440 on: February 05, 2016, 05:23:59 PM »
Has he whose identity is known to all, but whose ID must never be mentioned by any other member apart from himself explained yet why the government has shelled out £12m to protect a couple of doctors from Rothley?  Is it to do with nuclear energy, or the Jews?

Of a more banal nature, one of Blonk's indicators as to his sham / charade theory concerned commissioning an age-progressed image of a missing child.

Other law enforcement agencies do so... does that mean that every case, wherever this is done, is a sham?

Is there any logical reason why one shouldn't be done in the absence of any evidence as to the fate of any particular missing child?





Offline Brietta

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #441 on: February 05, 2016, 05:36:03 PM »
I was rather hoping "Blonk" would respond with his rationale, I'm not overly interested in yours, no offence like.

I think you may have rather a wait for that, Alfred.
He is probably still composing answers to Carana's dissection of his rationale.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #442 on: February 05, 2016, 05:50:14 PM »
I think you may have rather a wait for that, Alfred.
He is probably still composing answers to Carana's dissection of his rationale.
I'm sure it will be worth the wait though - I will clear next Tuesday's diary in anticipation.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #443 on: February 05, 2016, 07:31:54 PM »
Has he whose identity is known to all, but whose ID must never be mentioned by any other member apart from himself explained yet why the government has shelled out £12m to protect a couple of doctors from Rothley?  Is it to do with nuclear energy, or the Jews?

Don't forget the 'elites' as proposed by some here!
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline blonk

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #444 on: February 05, 2016, 08:07:52 PM »
Of a more banal nature, one of Blonk's indicators as to his sham / charade theory concerned commissioning an age-progressed image of a missing child.

Other law enforcement agencies do so... does that mean that every case, wherever this is done, is a sham?

Is there any logical reason why one shouldn't be done in the absence of any evidence as to the fate of any particular missing child?

Could you please cite ONE specific example in world history of a case where an age-progressed photo has actually resulted in anyone being found?

That is really the kernel of that point - though of course it was the totality of the 14 points I gave that has led me to conclude that Operation Grange does not appear to be an honest search for the truth

PETITION SIGNERS >>> 1,567    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/108562
« Last Edit: February 05, 2016, 08:11:34 PM by blonk »

Offline Carana

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #445 on: February 05, 2016, 08:15:52 PM »
Could you please cite ONE specific example in world history of a case where an age-progressed photo has actually resulted in anyone being found?

That is really the kernel of that point - though of course it was the totality of the 14 points I gave that has led me to conclude that Operation Grange does not appear to be an honest search for the truth

PETITION SIGNERS >>> 1,567    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/108562

Are you questioning whether any age-progressed image ever produced by law enforcement anywhere is a sham, or just this one?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #446 on: February 05, 2016, 08:21:45 PM »
Are you questioning whether any age-progressed image ever produced by law enforcement anywhere is a sham, or just this one?

Can you find one example to counter Blonk's first question in his last post ?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #447 on: February 05, 2016, 08:24:28 PM »
Could you please cite ONE specific example in world history of a case where an age-progressed photo has actually resulted in anyone being found?

That is really the kernel of that point - though of course it was the totality of the 14 points I gave that has led me to conclude that Operation Grange does not appear to be an honest search for the truth

PETITION SIGNERS >>> 1,567    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/108562

Then ..again..what do you think is it's purpose...

Online misty

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #448 on: February 05, 2016, 08:28:03 PM »
Could you please cite ONE specific example in world history of a case where an age-progressed photo has actually resulted in anyone being found?

That is really the kernel of that point - though of course it was the totality of the 14 points I gave that has led me to conclude that Operation Grange does not appear to be an honest search for the truth

PETITION SIGNERS >>> 1,567    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/108562

It's not an abducted child case, but try this one.
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/04/26/us/pennsylvania-missing-mystery/

ETA See also
http://www.skipease.com/blog/missing-persons/age-progression-find-missing-people/
« Last Edit: February 05, 2016, 08:43:20 PM by misty »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Petition re Madeleine McCann on Prime Minister's website
« Reply #449 on: February 05, 2016, 08:38:41 PM »
It's not an abducted child case, but try this one.
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/04/26/us/pennsylvania-missing-mystery/


it shows how useful an age progression cab be