One of the very first things the PJ did when Goncalo Amaral was co-ordinator was to ascertain who the victim was and when she was last seen by a non-family member.
Your promotion of Richard Hall's theory that Madeleine McCann had not to all intents and purposes existed since the Sunday of her arrival in Luz flies in the face of that ... and in my opinion suggests that you consider the PJ and the co-ordinator were negligent ... really, really negligent ... or complete and utter idiots.
That is not my opinion of them and never really has been.
What is your explanation of how Richard Hall was able to pick up on facts you obviously think the PJ missed?
the short answer to this is that amaral should never have been took off this case in mid flow ...who knows what stance he would have took ...or uncovered ...if left to continue ...i believe he would have got to the truth ...if he had been left to it ...before the political issue took over
as for R H ....repeat of OP
WHEN MADELEINE DIED?
The past presence of a human corpse was detected in the McCanns’ apartment and in many other places associated with the McCanns by highly trained police sniffer dogs. This clue suggests that Madeleine may have died and her body lain in the apartment for a period of time. Assuming this is correct, what date and time did Madeleine die?
The most logical way to address this question is to go back in time to determine what was the last piece of credible evidence, which proves Madeleine was alive. This film attempts to do this by forensically examining witness statements, photographs, physical evidence, police reports and media reports. In doing so the film exposes the agenda of the mainstream media which has, on the whole, helped to cover up the truth about the Madeleine McCann case.