Author Topic: Sadie's theory.  (Read 126951 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #360 on: February 23, 2016, 08:02:37 AM »
Apparently that's not Sadie's theory, that's just Sadie's theory. She seems to have either spilt her theory on Madleine's disappearance in two with part 1 being how and when and two being why or all the bloodline stuff is not relevant, off topic and needs deleting. However we have to setup another thread for Sadie's Theory (the sequel) or she won't discuss it.

Hmmmm.

at least Sadie has come up with a theory...wheras it seems you cannot

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #361 on: February 23, 2016, 08:05:41 AM »
at least Sadie has come up with a theory...wheras it seems you cannot

Theories are easy.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #362 on: February 23, 2016, 08:08:37 AM »
Apparently that's not Sadie's theory, that's just Sadie's theory. She seems to have either spilt her theory on Madleine's disappearance in two with part 1 being how and when and two being why or all the bloodline stuff is not relevant, off topic and needs deleting. However we have to setup another thread for Sadie's Theory (the sequel) or she won't discuss it.

Hmmmm.

So Sadie's theory is not really Sadie's theory, but one she chooses to alter because she knows it will be laughed at, due to her imagined connections to various parties mentioned in Dan Brown's book, including of course the handshake brigade, really powerful people and the tooth fairy.  8**8:/:

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #363 on: February 23, 2016, 08:09:27 AM »
Theories are easy.

well lets hear yours...I can guarantee it wont hold water

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #364 on: February 23, 2016, 08:14:34 AM »
well lets hear yours...I can guarantee it wont hold water

Here's one...

Person A is around the OC, sees the McCanns leaving the apartment by the patio, knows it is unlocked. Waits until they gone into the tapas. Drive up to back entrance of 5a, nips into apartment, picks up Madeleine (if she wakes just tell her taking to Daddy), out tothe car, drive off. Job done.


Not mine, just so simple that not sure why it isn't promoted.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #365 on: February 23, 2016, 08:16:01 AM »
Here's one...

Person A is around the OC, sees the McCanns leaving the apartment by the patio, knows it is unlocked. Waits until they gone into the tapas. Drive up to back entrance of 5a, nips into apartment, picks up Madeleine (if she wakes just tell her taking to Daddy), out tothe car, drive off. Job done.


Not mine, just so simple that not sure why it isn't promoted.
Bai jove you've cracked it!  Can we start a new thread to discuss this perfect theory?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #366 on: February 23, 2016, 08:23:29 AM »
Here's one...

Person A is around the OC, sees the McCanns leaving the apartment by the patio, knows it is unlocked. Waits until they gone into the tapas. Drive up to back entrance of 5a, nips into apartment, picks up Madeleine (if she wakes just tell her taking to Daddy), out tothe car, drive off. Job done.


Not mine, just so simple that not sure why it isn't promoted.

as I said...you cannot provide a theory of your own...you just criticise everyone else

Online Eleanor

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #367 on: February 23, 2016, 08:24:36 AM »
I think Slarti's Theory holds a lot of water, but we need a new Thread if someone would care to start one.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #368 on: February 23, 2016, 08:30:12 AM »
as I said...you cannot provide a theory of your own...you just criticise everyone else

Any theories I have which involve the McCanns will remain private given the litigious nature of the said couple.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #369 on: February 23, 2016, 08:31:16 AM »
Any theories I have which involve the McCanns will remain private given the litigious nature of the said couple.

you mean because they are not supported by evidence and are therefore indefensible

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #370 on: February 23, 2016, 08:33:36 AM »
you mean because they are not supported by evidence and are therefore indefensible

There is no evidence that confirms any of the theories.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #371 on: February 23, 2016, 08:40:03 AM »
There is no evidence that confirms any of the theories.

Precisely.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #372 on: February 23, 2016, 08:41:34 AM »
There is no evidence that confirms any of the theories.

but your theories would be speculative and libellous and therefore against forum rules..if the parents are not involved ...as confirmed by SY ...abduction is proved on the balance of probabilities...and thats why the remit is as such...perfect logic

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #373 on: February 23, 2016, 08:48:13 AM »
There is no evidence that confirms any of the theories.

and therefore no evidence to condemn the mccanns so perhaps you should stop

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #374 on: February 23, 2016, 08:50:39 AM »

Meanwhile SY's investigation is winding down.

No one seems to know what the Portuguese are actually doing and Sadie has her theories, which could easily be pages in a Dan Brown book.  8(0(*