Author Topic: Sadie's theory.  (Read 126819 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Carana

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #375 on: February 23, 2016, 09:00:35 AM »
Sadie's theory appears to be based on the idea that Tannerman and Smithman are the same person, unless I've misunderstood.

However, it's also possible that neither were carrying Madeleine (i.e., both are red herrings).

I still don't see what would necessarily exclude a lone operator.


Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #376 on: February 23, 2016, 09:36:51 AM »
Any theories I have which involve the McCanns will remain private given the litigious nature of the said couple.
We have a private part of the forum which cannot be accessed by non-members - why don't you use that to expound on your highly plausible and logical theory there?  We won't tell, promise!

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #377 on: February 23, 2016, 09:38:57 AM »
We have a private part of the forum which cannot be accessed by non-members - why don't you use that to expound on your highly plausible and logical theory there?  We won't tell, promise!

 @)(++(*
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #378 on: February 23, 2016, 10:48:57 AM »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #379 on: February 23, 2016, 11:17:38 AM »

Offline sadie

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #380 on: February 23, 2016, 11:26:44 AM »
Apparently that's not Sadie's theory, that's just Sadie's theory. She seems to have either spilt her theory on Madleine's disappearance in two with part 1 being how and when and two being why or all the bloodline stuff is not relevant, off topic and needs deleting. However we have to setup another thread for Sadie's Theory (the sequel) or she won't discuss it.

Hmmmm.
Let's keep the original sadies theory clear of other distractions if you dont mind.  I am already under too much pressure trying to answer questions on the basic original theory withouit being bombarded by other stuff.  I am still several pages behind answering questions and comments and I am no longer going to stay up until all hours trying to catch up.  Too old for that.

All in good time, we can look at other sub theories, if you wish ... BUT one at a time.



ETA  I have a large number of "sub" theories, some of which you will never see on here

Offline mercury

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #381 on: February 23, 2016, 09:48:09 PM »
It's not surprising that McCann supporters will either screen grab or c and p from here to elsewhere, it's a trait and one they trumpet too




Offline sadie

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #382 on: February 26, 2016, 01:17:35 AM »
Oh sadie found your architecture thread which you thought was "mysteriously wiped" or at least a spin off,cheers


http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2440.0
Oh, thank you mercury.

I enjoyed that for a while..  Strange those red hearts painted on the streets.

Offline sadie

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #383 on: February 26, 2016, 01:21:53 AM »
Apparently that's not Sadie's theory, that's just Sadie's theory. She seems to have either spilt her theory on Madleine's disappearance in two with part 1 being how and when and two being why or all the bloodline stuff is not relevant, off topic and needs deleting. However we have to setup another thread for Sadie's Theory (the sequel) or she won't discuss it.

Hmmmm.
There are lots of theories slarti, but I aint doing them all in one go.  I am too old almost to manage this one theory.  At present, I am tackling the only one that was called "Sadies Theory"

Offline sadie

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #384 on: February 26, 2016, 01:25:02 AM »
Here's one...

Person A is around the OC, sees the McCanns leaving the apartment by the patio, knows it is unlocked. Waits until they gone into the tapas. Drive up to back entrance of 5a, nips into apartment, picks up Madeleine (if she wakes just tell her taking to Daddy), out tothe car, drive off. Job done.


Not mine, just so simple that not sure why it isn't promoted.
perfect but it doesn't explain certain things

.... and I aint going into that all over again.

Offline sadie

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #385 on: February 26, 2016, 01:36:14 AM »
Sadie's theory appears to be based on the idea that Tannerman and Smithman are the same person, unless I've misunderstood.

However, it's also possible that neither were carrying Madeleine (i.e., both are red herrings).

I still don't see what would necessarily exclude a lone operator.
Perfectly possible Carana, but more difficult to get it right IMO.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #386 on: February 26, 2016, 07:34:21 AM »
Yep, I am very aware that they sound likie that.   But the majority of the secret society groups that Dan Brown named are still there according to the internet


And the members in them do not just sit around twiddling their thumbs.

They don't tend to get involved in child disappearances.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline sadie

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #387 on: June 20, 2018, 11:03:04 PM »
I am not going into it all again, but I have a multitude of FACTS, co-incidences galore and it seems as tho SY might well be following much of my (huge) theory, which fits together like a massive jigsaw.  Remember, they made a piont of showing my small and large folders on Crimewatch and making a positive statement at the same time 

That particular scene on Crimewatch appears to have been wiped from the internet, as do several photos etc that indicate other things.  Strange how pertinent photos, videos and facts that prove things against certain parts of the PJ disappear, dontcha think ?

All these things point to Madeleine being alive in 2012, including photos of a little girl I believe to be her.   These were taken exactly where I had worked out she was likely to be.  Precisely there. 

I knew the place and went searching there and found what I was looking for


Hope that answers your question.


Now if she was alive in 2012, then only an idiot would think she died in 2007. 
It is up to you whether you believe me, or not, and as i have my hands tied and mouth zippered atm, I cant enlighten you any more.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #388 on: June 20, 2018, 11:32:31 PM »
I am not going into it all again, but I have a multitude of FACTS, co-incidences galore and it seems as tho SY might well be following much of my (huge) theory, which fits together like a massive jigsaw.  Remember, they made a piont of showing my small and large folders on Crimewatch and making a positive statement at the same time 

That particular scene on Crimewatch appears to have been wiped from the internet, as do several photos etc that indicate other things.  Strange how pertinent photos, videos and facts that prove things against certain parts of the PJ disappear, dontcha think ?

All these things point to Madeleine being alive in 2012, including photos of a little girl I believe to be her.   These were taken exactly where I had worked out she was likely to be.  Precisely there. 

I knew the place and went searching there and found what I was looking for


Hope that answers your question.


Now if she was alive in 2012, then only an idiot would think she died in 2007. 
It is up to you whether you believe me, or not, and as i have my hands tied and mouth zippered atm, I cant enlighten you any more.

So can I take it you didn’t check the bin chutes etc ?

Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline sadie

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #389 on: June 21, 2018, 12:21:41 AM »
My investigations looked forwrd; they were about where she was taken to afterwards and who was responsible.   Not the minutiae of an abduction; that was the past.    I soon found stuff that no-one else had even thought of looking for.

Compelling stuff, but I always know that I could be wrong .... However so much stuff that backed everything up makes me think that I got the essential part of it right.