Author Topic: Sadie's theory.  (Read 126946 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #435 on: June 22, 2018, 11:58:31 PM »
I type too fast on the iPad.

But I think you knew what I meant anyway.
Sometimes it’s hard to tell.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #436 on: June 23, 2018, 12:19:28 AM »
You should also look elsewhere to the endless freedom of information requests and theories  by sceptics sent to NSY and the Portuguese police.

Absolutely.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #437 on: June 24, 2018, 02:24:20 PM »
IMO they were anxious to rule out all other possibilities that had been mooted before taking on my theory, which I accept looks rather bizarre  ... but SY were listening to it .... so tghey must have wondered.   

I cant have got everything right, but from the course people seem to be thinking SY have laterly taken, most of it seems to follow my findings and thoughts.

That is all I can say.


From the course these people are thinking, can you at least provide what the course is, and what these people are thinking, and who these people are? That would be most helpful in adding weight to your claims. and then we can discuss them.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline barrier

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #438 on: June 24, 2018, 05:44:29 PM »
IMO they were anxious to rule out all other possibilities that had been mooted before taking on my theory, which I accept looks rather bizarre  ... but SY were listening to it .... so tghey must have wondered.   

I cant have got everything right, but from the course people seem to be thinking SY have laterly taken, most of it seems to follow my findings and thoughts.

That is all I can say.

Given that SY or the PJ aren't giving a running commentary what is their thinking?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #439 on: June 24, 2018, 05:51:16 PM »
Given that SY or the PJ aren't giving a running commentary what is their thinking?

Why are you asking that given that you are aware of the news blackout by the PJ and SY?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline barrier

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #440 on: June 24, 2018, 05:54:53 PM »
Why are you asking that given that you are aware of the news blackout by the PJ and SY?

Read Sadies post she mentions SY line of thinking just trying to ascertain what it is.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #441 on: June 24, 2018, 06:52:08 PM »
Read Sadies post she mentions SY line of thinking just trying to ascertain what it is.

I have also read that Sadie will not divulge anything specific she has given to Scotland Yard ... I believe someone was taking the proverbial about just that not many posts back.

I'm beginning to suspect a bit of goading here.  I apologise if I've got you wrong ... but if I have not, please desist immediately.  Thank you.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #442 on: June 24, 2018, 07:04:22 PM »
How can anyone who supports amarals thesis condemn sadie

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #443 on: June 24, 2018, 08:09:47 PM »
Very easily.

Then imo you do not understand  the evidence... IMO amaral had no more evidence to support it than  Sadie

Offline faithlilly

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #444 on: June 24, 2018, 08:48:12 PM »
Then imo you do not understand  the evidence... IMO amaral had no more evidence to support it than  Sadie

But his theory was a damn sight more plausible.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #445 on: June 24, 2018, 08:50:53 PM »
Then imo you do not understand  the evidence... IMO amaral had no more evidence to support it than  Sadie

Sadie’s theory has no evidence, no names, no descriptions, pure guesswork as to method, has had people with portable forges to cast keys, shadowy elites, blood lines, second comings, templars, Jewish genealogy, brood mares and borrows too much from David Icke and James Bond.

Amaral’s theory is a plausible explanation which fits the facts of the case and doesn’t involve nebulous unknown forces.

If you equate the two, fine.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #446 on: June 25, 2018, 09:18:05 AM »
Perhaps I'm following a different 'Sadie's Theory' but according to the one I understand Madeleine was alive in 2012, hence no freezer.

What has Amaral/freezer got to do with Sadie's Theory?
« Last Edit: June 25, 2018, 03:50:41 PM by John »
What's up, old man?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #447 on: June 25, 2018, 09:25:51 AM »
Perhaps I'm following a different 'Sadie's Theory' but according to the one I understand Madeleine was alive in 2012, hence no freezer.

What has Amaral/freezer got to do with Sadie's Theory?
Sadie's theory was being compared to Amaral's theory.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #448 on: June 25, 2018, 09:49:34 AM »
Sadie's theory was being compared to Amaral's theory.
One is apparently plausible, the other not.  IMO both are fantastical and implausible but for different reasons, however apparently it’s OK to say it about one but not the other, judging by some of the responses on this thread.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Carana

Re: Sadie's theory.
« Reply #449 on: June 25, 2018, 10:11:42 AM »
Sadie’s theory has no evidence, no names, no descriptions, pure guesswork as to method, has had people with portable forges to cast keys, shadowy elites, blood lines, second comings, templars, Jewish genealogy, brood mares and borrows too much from David Icke and James Bond.

Amaral’s theory is a plausible explanation which fits the facts of the case and doesn’t involve nebulous unknown forces.

If you equate the two, fine.


Unlike his idea that MI5 would have "case files" on the disappearance of the child of two provincial doctors on holiday when his view is that she had an accident behind a sofa while her parents were absent?

Or that US foreign intelligence agencies would have had satellite images of PdL that evening who are reluctant to reveal that Gerry was Smithman?

LOL. Seriously??


P.M. - Would it have been possible to go further, in gathering evidence, after what took place in September 20071, or not?

G.A. - As I said before, the investigation is an investigation that is interrupted, an investigation that needs to be concluded. I believe that it is possible to make progress, if it wasn't for lack of political will; now with political will, based on this note - which is only a note as you said, but remains an important note nevertheless between two ambassadors, from one ambassador to the US State Department, that must have the weight that it has. Hopefully now, it will also be disclosed those photos, those satellite images that we believe to be in the possession of the US authorities, that we, the Portuguese police mentioned first, and also requested, a request that was denied to us.

P.M. - In your understanding, what could those satellite images reveal?

G.A. - They can reveal who was the person that carried the child on that night on its way to the beach. According to an Irish couple statement, with an alleged 80% certainty, it was Gerald McCann himself. That could be the confirmation of that Irish couple's statement.

https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/12/goncalo-amaral-on-wikileaks-release.html


NB I haven't read through all this thread, just picking it up from the end at the moment.