Wandering Off Topic

[Mr Gray]

If the cause had been determined , or someone charged, we would know by now.

At the last announcement, if correct, they were chasing one final lead.

Please tell me where I am wrong.

Things may have changed since that announcement...we just do not know

[slartibartfast]

slarti
I think I would go for Delphic actually.  More than one enigmatic reason.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphic_ambiguity

[sadie]

If the cause had been determined , or someone charged, we would know by now.

At the last announcement, if correct, they were chasing one final lead.

Please tell me where I am wrong.

If the cause had been determined , or someone charged, we would know by now.

In YOUR opinion

[sadie]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphic_ambiguity

My meaning for the word Delphic comes from the lists here

http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/delphic


Several of the words in these lists cover my meaning .... but you will have to work out which ones.  Soz

[stephen25000]

If the cause had been determined , or someone charged, we would know by now.

In YOUR opinion

So Sadie, why would these 'globally powerful people' you refer to permit an investigation ?

Meanwhile if you say I am wrong, can you prove that the nature of Madeleine's disappearance has been proved , or someone arrested ?

[barrier]

So Sadie, why would these 'globally powerful people' you refer to permit an investigation ?

Meanwhile if you say I am wrong, can you prove that the nature of Madeleine's disappearance has been proved , or someone arrested ?

Well seeing as its a given SY have no jurisdiction abroad,the PJ are the ones who hold the key,not a peep out of them,strange innit,given all the publicity of the supposed last,last lead from SY.

[sadie]

So Sadie, why would these 'globally powerful people' you refer to permit an investigation ?

Meanwhile if you say I am wrong, can you prove that the nature of Madeleine's disappearance has been proved , or someone arrested ?

Can YOU prove that the nature of Madeleines disappearance has NOT been proven ?

You should have said IMO, but you appear to think that as a moderator, you can get away with it ... and, of course, you can unless we keep picking you up for it

How tiresome to have to do that repeatedly. 

[stephen25000]

Can YOU prove that the nature of Madeleines disappearance has NOT been proven ?

You should have said IMO, but you appear to think that as a moderator, you can get away with it ... and, of course, you can unless we keep picking you up for it

How tiresome to have to do that repeatedly. 

You can believe in any story you wish Sadie, but it won't make it true.

[stephen25000]

Well seeing as its a given SY have no jurisdiction abroad,the PJ are the ones who hold the key,not a peep out of them,strange innit,given all the publicity of the supposed last,last lead from SY.

Quite right Barrier.

For some, it is all they have left.

[barrier]

Can YOU prove that the nature of Madeleines disappearance has NOT been proven ?

You should have said IMO, but you appear to think that as a moderator, you can get away with it ... and, of course, you can unless we keep picking you up for it

How tiresome to have to do that repeatedly. 

Rowley  only as recently as May of this year said they still weren't sure of which hypothese to follow.
Now unless you know different this is the reference point.imo

: So, you’ll understand from your experience, the way murder investigations work, detectives will start off with various hypotheses, about what’s happened in a murder, what has happened in a missing person’s investigation, whether someone has been abducted. All those different possibilities will be worked through. This case is no different from that but the evidence is limited at the moment to be cast iron as to which one of those hypotheses we should follow. So we have to keep an open mind. As I said we have some critical lines of enquiry, those linked to particular lines of enquiry, but I’m not going to discuss them today because they are very much live investigations. 
 

[stephen25000]

Rowley  only as recently as May of this year said they still weren't sure of which hypothese to follow.
Now unless you know different this is the reference point.imo

Thank you for that reminder Barrier, which has been posted on hear before.


Why do do some people wish to forget it ?

[Mr Gray]

Rowley  only as recently as May of this year said they still weren't sure of which hypothese to follow.
Now unless you know different this is the reference point.imo

Rowley also said..

however she left that apartment she was abducted
The parents are not suspects..

so they dont know exactly what happened but the above to facts are true according to rowley

[barrier]

Rowley also said..

however she left that apartment she was abducted
The parents are not suspects..

so they dont know exactly what happened but the above to facts are true according to rowley

That could mean not leaving of her own accord.

[Mr Gray]

That could mean not leaving of her own accord.

but it is ruling out the involvement of the parents

[sadie]

You can believe in any story you wish Sadie, but it won't make it true.

you forget, stephen, I look at facts.


Now I am not getting into a prolonged slanging match.  With Christmas almost on us I haven't got the time to waste