My proposition is that if one wants to find out what happened, forget names, forget anecdotes and forget blame.
Test it all and why simulate with assumed gen in a computer programme when you can measure the parameter on site?
"In every human endeavor, a critical component to our success is our ability to solve
problems. Unfortunately, we often set ourselves up to fail with our various problem solving
strategies and our inherent prejudices. We’ve typically relied on what we believe
to be common sense, storytelling, and categorizing to resolve our problems"
I understand that, and I don't have a problem with that in principle.
However....
Setting aside the Twilight Zone reconstruction in the Cipriano case:
- How are the T9 supposed to remember at what pace they walked one year later?
- What if someone orders them: "you walk more slowly" and "you walk faster"? (I doubt that Rebelo would have done that, but they weren't to know, were they?)
- JT / Jez / Gerry can't agree on where they were, so how do you work that out?
- How do you ascertain whether two men in deep conversation actually heard JT flip-flopping up the road or not?
- How do you reconstruct the precise lighting and wind conditions?
- How do you reconstruct where all the independent (non-group) witnesses were at the time so long later (including people who were primarily in the restaurant kitchen or serving other guests)?