Katie Hopkins labels sex abuse victim 'a slag'!

[Mr Gray]

Here was I thinking you were the resident expert on medical matters.

Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger.[1][2] As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

It's paedophilia......

It is quite reasonable to refer to him as a paedophile as I have shown...if you want to defend him that is up to you...I find your defence sickening

[Alfred R Jones]

Adam Johnson was found guilty of sexual activity with a child, but he's not a paedophile?  Then what is he?

[Mr Gray]

Adam Johnson was found guilty of sexual activity with a child, but he's not a paedophile?  Then what is he?

it seems he's a nice bloke

[jassi]

Adam Johnson was found guilty of sexual activity with a child, but he's not a paedophile?  Then what is he?

A 'has been', hopefully.

[misty]

it seems he's a nice bloke

He's rather like that nice miscarriage of justice victim Ched Evans.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/footballer-ched-evans-could-500000-7504507

[Alfred R Jones]

it seems he's a nice bloke

Way nicer than someone like David Payne, in the topsy turvy world of the Katie-Hopkins supporting "sceptic" I'll wager!

[Alfred R Jones]

I guess in Katie Hopkins (and G-Unit's) ideal world this would never have come to court and the girl sent away with a flea in her ear, just like in the good old days, whilst Johnson would be free to have sex with as many 15 year olds as he likes (maybe even a 14 year old or two -  after all if she's up for it, and if the age of consent in Botswana is 14, then why the hell not?!...)

[Alice Purjorick]

Why is one fifteen year old a "victim" and another a "slag" - perhaps you could explain the fundamental difference to me, as in both cases it seems that girls are being sexually exploited by older men.

I did not refer to either one as a slag so perhaps you had better direct that particular question elsewhere.
The footy star broke the law and Hopkins made ill judged remarks. He is not according to definition a paedophile as the girl was not prepubescent.
However are you interested in the girls welfare and the law or are you interested in diverting and manipulating the conversation because Hopkins was openly hostile to the McCanns which judging by previous performance would not sit well with you and demand verbal retribution ?

[Alfred R Jones]

I did not refer to either one as a slag so perhaps you had better direct that particular question elsewhere.
The footy star broke the law and Hopkins made ill judged remarks. He is not according to definition a paedophile as the girl was not prepubescent.
However are you interested in the girls welfare and the law or are you interested in diverting and manipulating the conversation because Hopkins was openly hostile to the McCanns which judging by previous performance would not sit well with you and demand verbal retribution ?

I've already told you why I brought the subject up, and subsequently have been engaged in conversation with those who seem eager to defend the indefensible.  Sorry if that doesn't sit well with you but it's the nature of internet chat rooms. 

[Brietta]

I did not refer to either one as a slag so perhaps you had better direct that particular question elsewhere.
The footy star broke the law and Hopkins made ill judged remarks. He is not according to definition a paedophile as the girl was not prepubescent.
However are you interested in the girls welfare and the law or are you interested in diverting and manipulating the conversation because Hopkins was openly hostile to the McCanns which judging by previous performance would not sit well with you and demand verbal retribution ?

Katie Hopkins makes her living by making controversial statements about whatever is making the headlines at that particular moment in time.

Anyone who gives what she says the slightest credibility about anything should examine their consciences.  Anyone prepared to join in ... particularly when her target is a teenage girl ... probably never had any conscience to begin with.

[Alfred R Jones]

Quite. This 15 year old girl now has to contend with Katie Hopkins-inspired public abuse on top of everything else.  Let's hope she has strong supportive family around her and the mental strength to deal with it. 

[stephen25000]

I did not refer to either one as a slag so perhaps you had better direct that particular question elsewhere.
The footy star broke the law and Hopkins made ill judged remarks. He is not according to definition a paedophile as the girl was not prepubescent.
However are you interested in the girls welfare and the law or are you interested in diverting and manipulating the conversation because Hopkins was openly hostile to the McCanns which judging by previous performance would not sit well with you and demand verbal retribution ?

Well said.

This has become more to do with Hopkins views on the mccanns, than anything else as regards some mccann supporters.


As I said earlier, the man is a DH.

The girl if reported correctly was gloating to her friends about bagging him.

and Hopkins revels in controversy, as it gets her more notice and work.

[Alice Purjorick]

I've already told you why I brought the subject up, and subsequently have been engaged in conversation with those who seem eager to defend the indefensible.  Sorry if that doesn't sit well with you but it's the nature of internet chat rooms.

Reasonable enough.
I often wonder why there is a propensity on here for "doing a Humpty Dumpty" in an effort to make a point.

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”

[Alice Purjorick]

Katie Hopkins makes her living by making controversial statements about whatever is making the headlines at that particular moment in time.

Anyone who gives what she says the slightest credibility about anything should examine their consciences.  Anyone prepared to join in ... particularly when her target is a teenage girl ... probably never had any conscience to begin with.

You are bit slow on the uptake here old stick. Appealing to me like will not work. I don't have a conscience did you not realise?

[G-Unit]

As usual the 'disgusted of Tunbridge Wells' brigade have gone overboard with hyperbole and accusations. No-one here has defended this stupid footballer. No-one here has accused the girl of being anything but a stupid teenager. All anyone has said is that pedophile is not the correct term to use for this man. Shock horror! Really?